― Advertisement ―

HomeUpendra Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand ..... ... ... on 13...

Upendra Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand ….. … … on 13 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Jharkhand High Court

Upendra Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand ….. … … on 13 April, 2026

Author: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

                ( 2026:JHHC:10514 )




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                  A. B. A. No. 1547 of 2026

       Upendra Yadav, aged about 44 years, son of Ramkrit Yadav, resident of New
       Pinjara, Gaushala Chowk, Upper Bazar, P.O. Geneal Post Office, Ranchi, P.S.
       Kotwali, District-Ranchi                                    ...... ... Petitioner
                               Versus
The State of Jharkhand                                  .....      ...      Opposite Party
                            --------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner :Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P

04/ 13.04.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

SPONSORED

counsel for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with

Namkum (Kharsidag O.P.) P.S. Case No. 329 of 2025, registered under

sections 4 (1) (A) and 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)

Act, 1957 and Section 7, 9 and 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of

Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017, pending in the

Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is

owner of the truck and the said truck met with an accident thereafter it was

found that coal was loaded in the said truck. He next submits that petitioner

is having valid challan however dispute was with regard to certain timing of

the challan and the challan is part of the F.I.R. He submits that petitioner

has no criminal antecedent. However, for the same incident two F.I.R has

been lodged.

4. Learned counsel for the State oppose the prayer and submits that

the coal was being carried out illegally.

5. Considering that petitioner is owner of the truck, petitioner is

having valid challan however dispute was with regard to certain timing of

the challan and for the same incident two F.I.R has been lodged and in that

view of the matter, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned
( 2026:JHHC:10514 )

court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the

petitioners on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit

and proper.

6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

Dt.13.04.2026                                       ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
satyarthi-
 



Source link