Smt Rose Mary M vs Smt Reethamma on 10 July, 2026

    0
    4
    ADVERTISEMENT

    (PER: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

    RFA No.1820/2023 is filed by plaintiffs No.1 and 2 and

    SPONSORED

    RFA No.297/2024 is filed by defendants No.1 and 2

    challenging the Order dated 22.08.2023 passed by the LXV

    Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City

    (CCH-66) (‘trial Court’ for short) in O.S.No.4471/2021,

    whereby the application filed by defendants No.9 to 11

    under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) of the Code of Civil

    Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) was allowed and the plaint was

    rejected on the ground that it disclosed no cause of action

    and was barred by limitation. Consequently, the claim of

    defendants No.1 and 2 for share in the schedule properties

    was also dismissed.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here