Shama Parveen vs The State Of Jharkhand on 4 August, 2026

    0
    4
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Shama Parveen vs The State Of Jharkhand on 4 August, 2026

    Author: R. Mukhopadhyay

    Bench: Rongon Mukhopadhyay

                                                     ( 2026:JHHC:23097-DB )
    
    
    
    
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                   Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.237 of 2021
                                 ----
    Shama Parveen, wife of Md. Rakib, permanent resident of Sahpur,
    P.O. and P.S. Vami, District Samashtipur (Bihar); present resident
    of Luka Road, Qr. No.L-1/20, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District East
    Singhbhum (Jharkhand).
                                                     ----- Appellant
                                 Versus
    The State of Jharkhand                           ----- Respondent
                                  ------
                                PRESENT
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
                                -------
          For the Appellant     : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate
          For the Respondent : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P
                                -------
                             JUDGMENT
    

    Dated: 04.08.2026
    Per R. Mukhopadhyay, J.

    1. Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhury, learned counsel
    for the appellant and learned A.P.P.

    SPONSORED

    2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order
    of conviction and sentence dated 23.07.2021 (sentence passed on
    24.07.2021) passed by Shri Shesh Nath Singh, learned Additional
    Sessions Judge-IX, Jamshedpur in S.T. No. 573 of 2013, whereby
    and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence
    punishable under Section 302/34 IPC and has been sentenced to
    rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.20,000/- and
    in default in payment of fine, to undergo imprisonment for 6
    months.

    3. The prosecution case arises out of the written report of
    Md. Rakib in which it has been stated that on 19.05.2013 at about
    7.30 p.m., the wife of the informant namely Shama Parveen
    (appellant) along with her two sons Kasif Umar aged 4 years and
    Sarif Umar aged 2 years had gone to the house of Manjoor and
    when she did not return, the informant went in search of them at
    8.30 p.m. but of no avail. The informant had come back home at
    10.30 p.m. and went to sleep. It has been alleged that on
    20.05.2013 at 6.30 a.m., the informant was bathing when his
    neighbour Md. Amirullah came and disclosed that his wife was
    sitting on the road in front of the house. The informant after
    completing his bath had brought his wife home. After some time,
    Amirullah had once again come to the house of the informant and
    disclosed that both his sons were lying in a drain in front of the
    house of Amirullah wrapped in cloths. The informant, on such
    information, had gone to the said place and found both his sons
    wrapped in a saree of his wife and blood was seen oozing out from
    the neck and hands of both the children. The police was informed
    after which the dead bodies were taken to MGM Hospital. It has
    been alleged that Manjoor Alam used to stay with the informant
    and he had taken a loan of Rs.35,000/- which he was not
    returning. The said Manjoor Alam had an illicit relationship with
    the wife of the informant and he wanted to solemnise marriage with
    her and both the children were a hurdle in the desire of Manjoor
    Alam and this was the reason why the wife of the informant
    committed the murders at the instigation of Manjoor Alam.

    Based on the aforesaid allegations, Sakchi P.S. Case No.
    159 of 2013 was instituted under Sections 302, 494, 109, 406 IPC.
    On completion of investigation, charge sheet was submitted and
    after cognizance was taken, the case was committed to the court of
    sessions where it was registered as S.T. No. 573 of 2013. Charge
    was framed against the accused under Sections 302, 494, 109 and
    406 IPC which was read over and explained to the accused in Hindi
    to which she pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

    4. The prosecution has examined as many as nine
    witnesses in support of its case.

    5. P.W.1 Dr. Lalan Choudhury was posted as an Assistant
    Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, MGM College,
    Jamshedpur and on 20.05. 2013 he had conducted autopsy on the
    dead body of Sarif and had found the following:-

    2

    A. Incised wound:-

    1. 2.75 cm X 0.5 cm X 0.25 cm, 3 cm X 0.5 cm X
    0.25 cm and 2.5 cm X 0.5 cm X 0.25 cm over right
    side front of neck.

    2. 2.5 cm X 0.5 cm X 0.25 cm over medial aspect of
    right wrist.

    3. 1.5 cm X 0.5 cm X 0.25 cm over medial aspect of
    left wrist.

    B. Chemical burn mark over lips and oral cavity on
    left side of neck.

    The cause of death was opined to be on account of
    poisoning. The post-mortem report has been proved and marked as
    Exhibit-1.

    On the same day, he had conducted autopsy on the
    dead body of Kasif and had found the following:-

    “On examination, found antemortem chemical burn over
    right side of face, mouth (lips), left side of neck, both
    eyelids, nose, right ear and oral cavity.”

    The cause of death was opined to be on account of
    poisoning. He has proved the post-mortem report which has been
    marked as Exhibit-2.

    6. P.W.2 Md. Amiruzzama and P.W.3 Ismail Azad have not
    supported the case of the prosecution and were declared hostile by
    the prosecution.

    7. P.W.4 Md. Rakib is the informant and the husband of
    the accused Shama Parveen who has stated that since Md. Manjoor
    Alam had taken a loan of Rs.35,000/-, his wife Shama Parveen had
    gone to the house of Md. Manjoor Alam on 19.05.2013 for collecting
    the said money. On 20.05.2013 at 6.30 a.m. when he was bathing,
    he came to know that his wife was sitting in L-1 Road in front of
    Quarter No.20. When he reached the said place, he found his wife
    in an unconscious state and he brought her to his quarter. After
    some time, he came to know that his two children are lying in the
    drain and when he went, he found one of his sons throttled with
    something put on his mouth and the other son also throttled with
    the veins of both his hands cut. A few days back, Manjoor had

    3
    established physical relationship with his wife and he wanted to get
    rid of the children before solemnising marriage with Shama
    Parveen. He has proved the written report given by him to the
    police which has been marked as Exhibit-1.

    In cross-examination, he has deposed that he is not the
    author of the written report. He had not witnessed the murder of
    his children. He had not made any complaint to the police station
    or to the court.

    8. P.W.5 Ram Charit Pal was posted as a Sub-Inspector of
    Police at Sakchi P.S and on 20.05.2013 he had taken over the
    investigation of Sakchi P.S. Case No. 159 of 2013. He had inspected
    the place of occurrence which is in front of Quarter No. L-1/16 at
    Luka Road. He had found traces of blood at several places. He had
    seized blood stained soil. He has proved the seizure list which has
    been marked as Exhibit-5/1. He had also seized blood about 3 feet
    from the gate in the road and a seizure list was prepared which has
    been marked as Exhibit-6/1. He had also seized some blood which
    was fallen about 6 feet from the quarter on the north-western side.
    The seizure list has been proved and marked as Exhibit-7/1. Some
    blood was also collected and seized from near the door of Quarter
    No. L-1/16 and a seizure list was prepared which has been marked
    as Exhibit-8/1. He had seized near the place of occurrence a
    checkered blue-green colour Pallu of a saree from the drain near
    Quarter No. L-1/16 and a seizure list was prepared which has been
    marked as Exhibit-4/1. He had gone to MGM Hospital and had
    prepared the inquest report of the two children which have been
    proved and marked as Exhibit-12 and 13. He had sent the dead
    bodies for conducting post-mortem. He had once again gone to the
    place of occurrence and recorded the statements of witnesses. He
    had got Shama Parveen admitted to the hospital. He had got the
    lady constable change the saree of Shama Parveen which was
    blood-stained and the part of the saree which was recovered from
    the place of occurrence was similar to the one worn by Shama
    Parveen. He had prepared a seizure list of the saree which has been

    4
    proved and marked as Exhibit-14. He had recorded the
    confessional statement of Shama Parveen which has been marked
    as Exhibit-15. On the basis of the confessional statement of Shama
    Parveen a blood-stained blade, coloured bangles and blood on the
    floor were seized and a seizure list was prepared which has been
    marked as Exhibit-16. The articles were seized from a place which
    is situated at a distance of 200 meters from the first place of
    occurrence. He had sent the seized articles to forensic science
    laboratory. On completion of investigation he had submitted charge
    sheet. The endorsement on the formal F.I.R has been proved and
    marked as Exhibit-11/1 while the formal F.I.R has been marked as
    Exhibit-17. He has deposed that there are no eye witnesses to the
    incident. He had not taken the blood sample of the murdered
    children. The saree which was taken out from a sealed packet has
    been marked as Material Exhibit-M. The green coloured cloth has
    been marked as Material Exhibit-4/1. The six envelopes of State
    Forensics Laboratory, Ranchi containing blood-stained cotton have
    been marked as Material Exhibits-M/2 to M/7. The signature in
    the arrest memo of Shama Parveen and Manjoor Alam have been
    proved and marked as Exhibit-19 and 19/1.

    9. P.W.6 Md. Arshad Khan, P.W.7 Moin Khan, P.W.8 Rozy
    Khan and P.W.9 Md. Mobin Khan have not supported the case of
    the prosecution and they have been declared hostile by the
    prosecution.

    10. The statement of the accused was recorded under
    Section 313 Cr.P.C in which she has denied her complicity in the
    commission of the offence.

    11. The defence has examined one witness in support of its case.

    12. D.W.1 Shama Parveen is the accused who has stated
    that in the year 2012 she had come to Jamshedpur. Her husband
    had a friendship with Manjoor Alam and it was Manjoor Alam who
    had made arrangements for her stay. Her husband used to work in
    Ludhiana and she stayed alone with her two children. She has
    stated that Manjoor Alam used to regularly visit her house. For

    5
    depositing the service tax, Manjoor Alam had taken Rs.40,000/-
    from her husband as loan and some jewelleries which were kept on
    Mortgage. She had gone to the house of Manjoor for the loan
    amount and jewellery but nothing was given and instead Manjoor
    Alam expressed his love for her and wanted to marry her. Manjoor
    Alam already had two wives. She has deposed that on 20.05.2013
    at 7.00 p.m she had gone to the house of Manjoor Alam along with
    her children to demand return of the loan amount and jewellery
    but Manjoor Alam started misbehaving with her and tied her hands
    and mouth and administered Pepsi on her children. Both the
    children were murdered by Manjoor Alam.

    In cross-examination she has deposed that she had not
    disclosed about the incident to the Magistrate when she was
    produced before him. She has denied that the murder of her two
    children were committed by her in connivance with Manjoor Alam.

    13. It has been submitted by Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhury,
    learned counsel for the appellant that there are no eye witnesses to
    the occurrence and the conviction of the appellant is based on
    circumstantial evidence. It has been submitted that it was Manjoor
    Alam who was instrumental in committing the murders as he
    wanted to solemnise marriage with the appellant and the children
    were a thorn in his desire for such marriage. The appellant was
    found in an unconscious and disheveled state sitting on the road
    which furthermore signifies the distraught a mother has faced on
    having seen her two infant children die in such brutal fashion.
    Most of the witnesses of the prosecution have been declared hostile
    and the entire case rests upon the ocular evidence of P.W.4 and
    P.W.5. It has also been submitted that without there being any
    viscera report, the doctor conducting the post-mortem had come to
    an erroneous finding that the death had occurred on account of
    poisoning. The appellant has suffered incarceration for more than
    13 years and in absence of any concrete evidence, the appellant
    deserves to be acquitted from the charges leveled against her.

    14. Learned A.P.P has submitted that the appellant has

    6
    himself admitted that she had gone to the house of Manjoor Alam
    along with the children and therefore, there is a strong
    circumstance that it was the appellant who in connivance with
    Manjoor Alam had committed the murders to clear the path for her
    solemnising marriage with Manjoor Alam. On the confession of the
    appellant, blood-stained blade and bangles were recovered which
    furthermore enhances the case of the prosecution against the
    appellant.

    15. We have heard the learned counsel for the respective
    sides and have also perused the trial court record.

    16. Although the prosecution has examined nine witnesses,
    but apart from the doctor who had conducted the autopsy (P.W.1),
    the only other witnesses of substance are P.W.4 and P.W.5. The
    rest of the witnesses have been declared hostile by the prosecution.

    17. When we analyse the evidence of P.W.4 who is the
    informant, it clearly transpires that on 19.05.2013 the appellant
    had gone to the house of Manjoor Alam and in the next morning,
    P.W.4 had found the appellant in a distraught state beside the road
    and subsequent thereto the dead bodies of both the children
    wrapped in a cloth with injuries visible on their person recovered
    from a drain. Though some doubt creeps up with respect to the
    conduct of the appellant as no efforts were made by him to search
    out his wife despite she having not returned at night but barring
    such aberration, the other features of the case does point to an
    active role played by the appellant in doing away with the life of her
    infant sons. The appellant has got herself examined as D.W.1 and
    she has admitted to the fact that on the fateful evening she had
    gone to the house of Manjoor Alam taking her children with her for
    recouping the loan amount which was extended to Manjoor Alam.
    However, her narration of the events takes a different route by
    pinning all the blame upon Manjoor Alam of causing bodily injury
    upon the infants. They were also forced to drink Pepsi and the
    statement of the appellant appears to have been deliberately made
    to correlate with the findings in the autopsy report regarding the

    7
    cause of death being poisoning and to absolve herself of any wrong
    doing. P.W.4 has also stated about an illicit relationship between
    Manjoor Alam and the appellant and this assertion has to a certain
    extent admitted by the appellant as she in her 313 Cr.P.C
    statement has candidly stated about Manjoor Alam being desirous
    of solemnising marriage with her. The evidence of P.W.5 reveals
    about the confessional statement of the appellant leading to
    recovery of a blood-stained blade and bangles. The autopsy report
    of Sarif reveals about several incised wounds found on his person
    which can be attributed to have been committed with the help of a
    blade. P.W.5 has also observed that the Pallu in which the infants
    were wrapped, matched with the saree the appellant was wearing.

    18. The entire features of the case reveal the covert and
    clandestine manner in which the murders had taken place and that
    too in a brutal and grotesque manner. The appellant, being the
    mother, instead of protecting her children, had devoured them in a
    devilish fashion. No explanation has been furnished by the
    appellant relating to the entire episode inviting another angle to the
    case and all the components are aligned towards the guilt of the
    appellant.

    19. The learned trial court has considered aptly the
    essential features of the case while convicting the appellant for the
    offence under Section 302/34 IPC and sentencing her accordingly
    and having found no reasons to conclude otherwise, this appeal
    stands dismissed.

    20. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands
    closed.

    (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)

    (Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
    Dated: 4th August 2026
    Shamim/-

    Uploaded on: 06 /08/2026

    8



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here