Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Sahid Alias Titto S/O Jabar Khan vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 April, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:15487]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1527/2026
Sahid Alias Titto S/o Jabar Khan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o
Peeruka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg, (Rajasthan)
(Presently Accused in Judicial Custody at District Jail Deeg).
----Petitioner/Accused
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with
Mr. Kambale Sharan Gopinath, SP Deeg
through VC with
Mr. Ram Avtar, ASI, PS - Gopalgarh -
present in person
Dr. Sooraj Singh, MO - present in person
For complainant : Mr. Sanjay Khan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
1. Arguments Concluded on: 10.04.2026
2. Judgment Reserved on: 10.04.2026
3. Full Judgment/Operative Part Full Order
Pronounced:
4. Pronounced on: 15.04.2026
1. The present second bail application has been filed under
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for
short, ‘BNSS’) on behalf of the accused-applicant (for short, ‘the
applicant’) in connection with FIR No. 105/2025, registered at
Police Station Gopalgrah, District Deeg (Raj.) for the offence(s)
under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 125 of the Bhartiya
Nayay Sanhita (for short, ‘BNS’) and assailing the order dated
(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 01:48:08 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/04/2026 at 09:03:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:15487] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-1527/2026]
16.01.2026 passed by Additional Session Judge, Kaman, District
Deeg, whereby the bail application of the applicant, for offence
under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 125(2) and 109 of BNS
and Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act has been dismissed.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted
that the first bail application moved by the applicant was
dismissed by this Court vide order dated 17.11.2025. It is
submitted that the applicant was arrested on 02.09.2025 and has
remained in judicial custody since then. Learned counsel further
submitted that the complainant, in his statements recorded under
Section 180 of the BNSS, has not levelled any specific allegations
against the present applicant. It was also submitted that, as per
the medical examination report of the victim-complainant, none of
the injuries sustained are attributable to any sharp weapon,
including a firearm, and further, none of the injuries have been
opined to be serious or life-threatening in nature. It was
additionally submitted that the charge-sheet has already been
filed. Lastly, it is submitted that the co-accused persons, namely
Samsher, Aalim, and Vajib, have already been enlarged on bail,
and that no criminal antecedents are attributed to the present
applicant.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel appearing
for the complainant have vehemently opposed the instant bail
application. It was also apprised to the Court that there is one
criminal antecedent registered against the applicant.
4. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel
appearing for the parties, interacted with the Medical Expert
(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 01:48:08 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/04/2026 at 09:03:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:15487] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-1527/2026]
present in the Court, Police Officers, who appeared via V.C. and
perused the material available on record.
5. Upon doing the needful, this Court deems it apposite to allow
the instant bail application, taking note of the ratio encapsulated
in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation:
(2022) 10 SCC 51 and Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar
Pradesh: (2018) 3 SCC 22, inter alia, that the nature of injuries
which are neither grievous nor life-threatening and are opined to
be simple in nature (with injury Nos. 1 to 3 being simple and
involving self-induced foreign particles) as per the medical report
dated 24.10.2025; that the Medical Expert upon marking presence
before the Court has also cautiously explained the rationale as to
how the opinion has been formulated (relevant extract of which
reproduced at the conclusion of this paragraph); as the charge-
sheet has already been filed; that there is only one criminal
antecedent registered against the applicant; and the fact that co-
accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; that the
applicant has been in custody ever since the date of arrest i.e.
02.09.2025.
^^gekjs }kjk mä ,e,yvkj uEcj 90@2025 fnukad&
28@8@25 dh pksVksa dk jsfM;ksyksftLV vksfiuh;u ,oa
bykt lEcU/kh dkxtkr pkgs x;s Fks ftlesa Jheku CMHO
Mhx }kjk i= Øekad 3839@2025 ds }kjk Jheku fpfdRlk
v/kh{kd Jh txUukFk igkfM;k esfMdy dkWyst Hkjriqj dh
jsfM;ksyksftLV vksihfu;u ds fy, i= fy[kk x;k ysfdu
jsfM;ksyksftLV dh vuqiyC/krk gksus ds dkj.k ,oa bZykt
lEcU/kh dkxtkr o X-Ray fQYe dk voyksdu djus ds
ckn iqfyl Fkkuk xksikyx< }kjk eq> M.O. ls vksihuh;u
pkgk x;k gS D;ksafd eg:c dk izFke bykt eu M.O. }kjk
fd;k x;k FkkA et:c }kjk tks bykt lEcU/kh dkxtkr
is”k fd;s x;s mlds vk/kkj ij pksV la[;k 1] 2] 3 dk izdkj
(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 01:48:08 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/04/2026 at 09:03:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:15487] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-1527/2026]
lkekU; (Simple) gS ,oa gfFk;kj izdkj Blunt gSA tCr
fd;s x;s Foreign partical Loa; ds }kjk Hkh j[ks gq;s
izrhr gks ldrs gSA
,lMh@&
fpfdRlk vf/kdkjh
lkeqnkf;d LokLF; dsUnz
xksikyx<+ ¼Mhx½^^
(Emphasis laid)
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is
allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant – Sahid alias
Titto S/o Jabar Khan shall be enlarged on bail provided he
furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of
Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his
appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing
and as and when called upon to do so.
7. Records, if any, furnished for perusal of the Court are
directed to be returned, to the concerned authority.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Preeti Asopa
(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 01:48:08 PM)
(Downloaded on 15/04/2026 at 09:03:55 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
