Delhi High Court – Orders
Rajesh Gambhir vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 27 April, 2026
Author: Swarana Kanta Sharma
Bench: Swarana Kanta Sharma
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 743/2026
RAJESH GAMBHIR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Satyam Thareja (DHCLSC) and
Mr. Shaurya Katoch, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State
with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Aniket
Kumar Singh and Mr. Priyansh Raj
Singh Senger, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
ORDER
% 27.04.2026
1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks grant of
parole for a period of 8 weeks, on the ground to file SLP before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court and for maintaining social and family ties.
2. In the present case, the petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR
No. 456/2016, registered at Police Station Ashok Vihar, Delhi, for offences
under Sections 354A, 354D, 509 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
(hereafter ‘IPC‘) and Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology
Act, 2000 (hereafter ‘IT Act‘). Vide judgment dated 26.03.2024, the
petitioner was convicted by the learned Trial Court under Sections 354A(iii),
354D, 509 and 506 of the IPC; Section 67B of the IT Act; and Sections
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2026 at 21:47:57
11(v), 12, 13 and 14 of the POCSO Act. Vide order on sentence dated
02.12.2024, the petitioner was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three
years under Section 12 of the POCSO Act, one year under Section 506 IPC,
and five years each under Section 14 of the POCSO Act and Section 67B of
the IT Act, with all sentences directed to run concurrently. The petitioner’s
appeal (CRL.A. 141/2025) was dismissed by the Delhi High Court on
28.07.2025, and he now intends to file a Special Leave Petition before the
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole ground for
rejection of the petitioner’s application for grant of parole by the competent
authority was that the petitioner had not completed one year of
incarceration, excluding the period of under-trial detention and any
remission. It is further submitted that the petitioner has now completed the
requisite period of one year and is, therefore, entitled to be considered for
grant of parole.
4. The learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner has now
completed one year of incarceration and, in terms of Rule 1210(1) of the
Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, is eligible to seek parole.
5. This Court has heard arguments addressed by the learned counsel for
the applicant and the learned APP for the state, and has perused the material
available on record.
6. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the
following relief:
“Issue writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Order No.
F.18/92/2025/HG/PRISONS/ 3734 DT. 05.12.2025 passed by the
competent authority vide ·which the application for parole of the
Petitioner has been rejected and also Issue a writ in the nature of
Mandamus directing the Respondent to release the Petitioner on paroleThis is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2026 at 21:47:57
for a period of 8 ·weeks for filing SLP before Hon’ble Supreme Court
and for maintaining social & family ties”
7. This Court observes that the sole ground on which the competent
authority rejected the petitioner’s application for grant of parole was that, in
terms of Rule 1210(1) of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, the petitioner had not
completed one year of incarceration. Rule 1210(1) of the Delhi Prison Rules,
2018, is reproduced hereinbelow:
“…Rule 1210 sub rule (1):-A convict must have served at least
the period of one year in prison excluding under-trial period
and any period covered by remission. However, inexceptional
cases, where the prisoner has spent more than 3 years as under
trial period or half of the sentence of the punishment awarded
as under trial then his parole application may be considered, if
he has spent at least 6 months in prison as convict. In this case,
the above said convict has been awarded sentence of 05 years. He is
only served 10 months as a convict in prison. Further, a minimum
one year conviction period is to be required in become eligible for
grant of parole…”
8. Therefore, in view of the fact that the petitioner has completed one
year of incarceration, as informed by the learned APP for the State, and is
now eligible for parole in terms of Rule 1210(1) of the Delhi Prison Rules,
2018, this Court is inclined to grant parole to the petitioner.
9. In this view of the above, the present petition is allowed. The
petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks, subject to the
following conditions:-
i. The petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.
10,000/- with one surety of the like amount, who shall be a family
member of the petitioner, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.
ii. The petitioner shall report to the SHO of the local area, once a
week on every Sunday at 10:00 AM, and shall not leave the National
Capital Territory of Delhi during the period of parole.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2026 at 21:47:57
iii. The petitioner shall furnish a telephone number to the Jail
Superintendent on which he can be contacted, if required. After his
release, he shall also inform his telephone number to the SHO of the
police station concerned.
iv. Immediately upon the expiry of period of parole, the petitioner
shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent.
v. The petitioner shall furnish a copy of the SLP filed in the Supreme
Court to the Superintendent Jail at the time of surrendering.
vi. The period of parole shall be counted from the day when the
petitioner is released from jail.
10. In the above terms, the present writ petition alongwith pending
application, stands disposed of.
11. A copy of this order be sent by the Registry to the Jail Superintendent.
12. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
APRIL 27, 2026/zp
rb
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2026 at 21:47:57
