Pradipbhai Karshanbhai Rajani vs State Of Gujarat on 20 May, 2026

    0
    4
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gujarat High Court

    Pradipbhai Karshanbhai Rajani vs State Of Gujarat on 20 May, 2026

                                                                                                                    NEUTRAL CITATION
    
    
    
    
                                R/SCR.A/6507/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 20/05/2026
    
                                                                                                                     undefined
    
    
    
    
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
    
                             R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 6507 of
                                                       2026
    
                          ==========================================================
                                                    PRADIPBHAI KARSHANBHAI RAJANI
                                                                Versus
                                                       STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                          ==========================================================
                          Appearance:
                          MR ANIL H RATHOD(9691) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                          MR ROHAN N SHAH APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                          ==========================================================
    
                             CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA
    
                                                                  Date : 20/05/2026
    
                                                                       ORDER
    

    1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for
    respondent – State of Gujarat.

    2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed to
    release him on parole leave on the ground of providing
    financial assistance to family. In support of it, necessary
    documents are produced on record.

    SPONSORED

    3. I have heard learned advocates appearing for the parties
    and have also perused the documents produced along with the
    petition as well as considered the averments made in this
    petition including jail remarks. It is found that the petitioner is
    convicted for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
    Instruments Act and he has been convicted for one and half
    year of imprisonment out of which he has already undergone

    Page 1 of 2

    Uploaded by PARMAR KRISH JAYESH(HC02348) on Thu May 21 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 21 21:10:13 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/6507/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/05/2026

    undefined

    six months of imprisonment. Having considered the ground for
    providing financial assistance to family coupled with the jail
    report which is not adversary in nature, I deem it fit to
    exercise my discretion. Therefore considering the grounds
    mentioned and the averments made in the petition, the
    present petition deserves to be allowed.

    4. Therefore, the present petition stands allowed partly. The
    petitioner prisoner is ordered to be released on parole leave for
    a period of two weeks from the date of his actual release, on
    executing personal bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand)
    before the Jail authority and on usual terms and conditions as
    may be imposed by the Jail Authority.

    5. The petitioner shall surrender before Jail Authority on
    completion of parole leave, without fail.

    6. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Registry to
    communicate the present order to the concerned jail authority
    forthwith.

    (NIRAL R. MEHTA,J)
    PARMAR KRISH/86

    Page 2 of 2

    Uploaded by PARMAR KRISH JAYESH(HC02348) on Thu May 21 2026 Downloaded on : Thu May 21 21:10:13 IST 2026



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here