Mohammed Alyas vs Uoi And Others on 19 May, 2026

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Mohammed Alyas vs Uoi And Others on 19 May, 2026

Author: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Bench: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

                                                                         Sr. No. 208

       HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                       AT JAMMU

WP (C) No. 2216/2025 c/w
CCP (S) No. 330/2025

Mohammed Alyas                                        .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)

                                Through :- Mr. Rahoof Khan, Advocate

                        v/s
UOI and Others                                                   .....Respondent(s)

                                Through :- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with
                                           Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC for R-1 & 3
                                           Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC vice
                                           Mr. Vipan Gandotra, Advocate for R-2
                                           Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice
                                           Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-4 & 5



CORAM:    HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

                                   ORDER

19.05.2026

WP (C) No. 2216/2025

SPONSORED

1. Reply stands filed by respondent nos. 1 & 3 to 5.

2. Mr. Karan Sharma, learned CGSC seeks and is granted last and final

opportunity of four weeks for filing reply with an advance copy to the

counsel for the other side.

CCP (S) No. 330/2025

1. By this petition, the petitioner herein has alleged non-compliance of

the order passed by this Court on 13.08.2025 in case titled

“Mohammed Alyas vs. UOI and Others. The operative portion of the

order (supra) is set out below: –

“In the meantime, it is provided that the portion of
the aforesaid land falling to the share of the
petitioner shall not be utilized by the respondents
2

for the construction of road without adopting due
course of law.”

2. Statement of facts stands filed by the respondents, wherein it is stated

that in terms of public notice dated 29.01.2025 land owners of village

Galhuti including the petitioner were directed to furnish bank account

details for disbursement of compensation.

3. It is further stated in the compliance report that the petitioner is not

the owner of the entire khasra no. 916, as claimed by him. His

ownership is only up to 17 marlas and 3 sarsai of the said khasra

number.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready to

submit his bank details only with respect to his entitlement. In view of

the statement made hereinabove, proceedings in the instant contempt

petition are closed.

5. Respondents are directed to disburse the amount after the petitioner

submits his bank details, provided there is no legal impediment.

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)
Judge
JAMMU
19.05.2026
Manik