Padambahadoor Takebahadoor@ Tika … vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026

    0
    26
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Telangana High Court

    Padambahadoor Takebahadoor@ Tika … vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026

          IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                               AT HYDERABAD
    
            THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
    
                  CRIMINAL PETITION No.7903 of 2026
                              DATE: 21.05.2026
    
    
    BETWEEN:
    
    
    Padambahadoor Takebahadoor @ Tika Rahul
    
    
                                            .....Petitioner/accused No.2
    
    
                                    And
    
    
    The State of Telangana.
                                                        .....Respondent
    
    
                                   ORDER
    

    The petitioner-accused No.2 filed the present application

    under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

    SPONSORED

    2023, seeking to grant bail to him in Crime No.990 of 2025 of

    Kushaiguda Police Station, registered for the offences punishable

    under Sections 8c r/w 22(c) and 27(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and

    Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act‘).
    2

    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7903 of 2026

    2. The case arose out of the contraband seized by the

    prosecution, i.e., 12 LSD bolts weighing 0.2 grams. Due to which,

    the petitioner was arrayed as accused No.2.

    3. Heard Mr. Kodari Mallikarjuna, learned counsel for the

    petitioner and Mr. Vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Public

    Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no

    substance was found in the possession of the petitioner and that

    the petitioner was arraigned as accused basing on the confession

    statements of the co-accused which is not permissible in view of

    the Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tofan Singh v. The

    State of Tamilnadu 1. Further, the petitioner was apprehended and

    remanded to judicial custody on 18.03.2026 and the investigation is

    substantially completed. Hence, learned counsel prayed this Court

    to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

    5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

    opposed for grant of bail stating that the allegations leveled

    against the petitioner are serious in nature. Further, the
    1
    2021(4) SCC 1
    3
    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7903 of 2026

    investigation is not yet completed. Hence, he prayed the Court to

    dismiss the criminal petition.

    6. In the light of the submissions made by both the learned

    counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it

    appears that the contraband seized 12 LSD bolts weighing 0.2

    grams, which is a commercial quantity. Further, in view of rigour

    of Section 37 of NDPS Act, the petitioner is not entitled for the

    bail. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the

    petitioner and the same is liable to be dismissed.

    7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

    Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

    closed.

    ____________________
    JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

    Date: 21.05.2026
    Gms/ggd
    4
    TMD,J
    Crl.P.No.7903 of 2026

    THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

    CRIMINAL PETITION No.7903 of 2026

    DATE: 21.05.2026

    Gms/ggd

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here