Muppidi Avinash Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 20 March, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Leave granted.

    SPONSORED

    2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 29.01.2026,

    whereby the Andhra Pradesh High Court has declined his prayer

    for anticipatory bail. The appellant sought anticipatory bail

    in FIR No.21/2024 dated 23.09.2024, registered with CID Police

    Station, Mangalagiri, for offences under Sections 409, 420,

    and 120B read with Sections 34 and 37 of the IPC and Sections

    7, 7A, 8, 13(1)(b), and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption

    Act, 1988.

    3. The allegations are that there were large-scale

    irregularities in the implementation of the excise policy and

    functioning of the Andhra Pradesh State Beverages Corporation

    Limited from 2019 to 2024. These irregularities included

    discrimination and manipulation of the allocation of Orders

    for Supply, giving preferential treatment to some brands at

    the cost of others. The entire episode has been captioned as

    the “Andhra Pradesh Liquor Scam”.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here