Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Monu vs State Of Rajasthan … on 2 April, 2026
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
No. 2280/2025
in
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.403/2025
Monu S/o Dhannaram, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Gali
No.06, Raralal Colony, Chak 3E Choti, Sriganganagar, District
Sriganganagar. At Present Lodged In Central Jail Sriganganagar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Charan
For Respondent(s) : Mr. CS Ojha, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA
Order
02/04/2026
1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been
moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment
dated 29.10.2025 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions
Judge No.2, Sri Ganganagar in Sessions Case No.13/2023
whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer life
imprisonment under Section 302/34 of IPC and lesser
punishment for the other offences under Sections 307/34,
326/34, 324/34 & 323/34 of IPC along with fine and default
sentence.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that
the learned trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB] (2 of 7) [SOSA-2280/2025]
and factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an
erroneous conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required
to be appreciated again by this court being the first appellate
Court.
3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the
accused-applicant for releasing the appellant on application
for suspension of sentence.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. There exists a fine yet significant distinction between the
grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973, and the suspension of sentence under
Section 389 Cr.P.C. While the power exercised under Section
439 CrPC is essentially discretionary in nature and operates
at the pre-conviction stage, the jurisdiction under Section
389 Cr.P.C, though also discretionary, is qualitatively
different and operates post-conviction. Under Section 389
CrPC, the appellate court is vested with a distinct authority;
however, the core consideration before the appellate forum
must necessarily be whether the judgment of conviction and
the consequent order of sentence are sustainable in the eyes
of law.
6. It is trite that the presumption of innocence, which ensures
in favour of an accused, comes to an end upon conviction.
Consequently, while considering an application under Section
389 CrPC, the appellate court is required to examine the
grounds raised in the appeal, and for such purpose, the oral
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB] (3 of 7) [SOSA-2280/2025]
and documentary evidence must be looked into. Where,
upon appreciation of evidence, it appears that the
conclusions drawn by the trial court may be erroneous, and
where logical, legal and sustainable arguments are advanced
assailing the findings, disclosing a strong and arguable case,
the appellate court is duty-bound to consider such
contentions.
7. Where the sustainability of the conviction itself becomes
debatable, and where the grounds raised in appeal, if
adjudicated in favour of the appellant, disclose a real and
substantial possibility of success, and where, prima facie, it
appears that the conviction may be reversed and the
appellant may be acquitted, the appellate court ought to
suspend the sentence pending disposal of the appeal.
8. Such discretion deserves to be exercised with greater
circumspection in cases where the appellate forum has
sufficient reason to believe that the appeal is not likely to be
taken up for hearing in the near future. In such
circumstances, the court is required to assess whether the
grounds raised are not merely ornamental but possess real
substance and force, for the simple reason that if the appeal
ultimately succeeds, the period of incarceration already
undergone cannot be undone or restituted. In such a
situation, the court should incline towards suspending the
sentence.
9. At the same time, it is well settled that the appellate court is
not required to record any definitive or conclusive finding, as
doing so would amount to forming a pre-determined opinion
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB] (4 of 7) [SOSA-2280/2025]
on the merits of the appeal at an initial stage, without
affording a full hearing on the appeal itself. It is sufficient if
the court merely indicates that the grounds raised are prima
facie appreciable, logical and legally tenable, that he are
founded upon settled principles of law, and that there
appears to be improper evaluation or assessment of
evidence, or non-consideration / disregard of relevant
statutory provisions.
10. It is also to be borne in mind that in several cases, the
conviction may ultimately be converted to a lesser offence,
or the propriety of the sentence imposed by the trial court,
being within its discretionary domain may also require
reconsideration, particularly whether an adequate and
proportionate sentence was imposed after due hearing on
the point of sentence. These aspects, too, are open to re-
examination at the appellate stage.
11. An appeal, in its true sense, is an extension of the trial, for
the reason that additional evidence may be taken, and the
entire body of evidence is subject to re-appreciation on both
factual and legal parameters. At this stage, the appellate
court is empowasd to set aside the conviction, modify it,
remand the matter, or maintain the judgment, as the case
may be.
12. In the High Court, thousands of criminal appeals have
remained pending for the last 20-30 years, including jail
appeals, where even the likelihood of early hearing does not
appear forthcoming. In such matters, instead of taking an
irreversible risk, the court must proceed on the safer side by
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB] (5 of 7) [SOSA-2280/2025]
placing paramount importance on human dignity and
personal liberty.
13. In the present case, it is the fact that no specific or overt has
been attributed upon appellant for either inflicting injuries to
the deceased Lalit or to any other person. A perusal of
Exhibit P-2 making it abundantly clear that as per the
allegations, the principal accused Sonu inflicted a stab injury
on the abdomen of the deceased Lalit and as per the
allegations, three accused namely Bhanwar Lal, Kaliya and
present appellant Monu made intervention in helding victim
Lalit and injuries were also inflicted by them. As a matter of
fact, it is very much evident from postmortem report Exhibit
P-28 that there was one incise wound which has been the
cause of death unfortunately, but no other injuries are found
on the body of the deceased. The submission of defence has
a force that to a great extent the story set out by
prosecution in the FIR is not found worthy of credence rather
belied in light of the postmortem report. A further fact which
persuaded this Court to extend the benefit of bail to the
appellant has been the exoneration of the accused Bhanwar
Lal whose role has been shown equal to the appellant. The
question raised by learned counsel for the petitioner has a
substance that the case of appellant and Bhanwar Lal is in
no manner distinguishable rather identical word to word. He
was on bail during the trial, but never misused the liberty
granted to him. All the issues raised are vital in nature and
carry sufficient force and substance, such that if they are
adjudicated in favour of the appellant, the possibility of
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB] (6 of 7) [SOSA-2280/2025]
acquittal cannot be ruled out. The grounds raised are
appreciable and necessitate definitive adjudication, which
would require meticulous examination and re-appreciation of
evidence, and there exists a reasonable possibility that such
exercise may ultimately ensure to the benefit of the
appellant.
14. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that
the sentence passed by learned trial court, the details of
which are provided in the first para of this order, against the
appellant-applicant named above shall remain suspended till
final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be
released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge and whenever
ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the
conditions indicated below:-
1. That he will appear before the trial Court in
the month of January of every year till the
appeal is decided.
2. That if the applicant change the place of
residence, he will give in writing their changed
address to the trial Court as well as to the
counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their
address(s), he will give in writing their changed
address to the trial Court.
15. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of
the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:15264-DB] (7 of 7) [SOSA-2280/2025]
registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in
which the accused-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy
of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready
reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account
for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of
cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant do
not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall
report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
(CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA),J (FARJAND ALI),J
102-chhavi/-
(Uploaded on 04/04/2026 at 12:13:19 PM)
(Downloaded on 06/04/2026 at 06:48:58 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
