Mohammad Ismail Wagay And vs Shokwat Ahmad Kutoo (Revenue / on 31 July, 2026

    0
    29
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

    Mohammad Ismail Wagay And vs Shokwat Ahmad Kutoo (Revenue / on 31 July, 2026

    Author: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

    Bench: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

                                                                                          Sr. No.13
                                                                                          Regular List
    
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                                          AT SRINAGAR
                                   CCP(S) 17/2024 in[WP(C) 2195/2023] CM(2660/2026)
                                         c/w i)WP(C) 2195/2023 CM(5125/2023)
    
    
                    MOHAMMAD       ISMAIL               WAGAY          AND ...Petitioner(s)/appellant(s)
                    ANR.(SENIOR CITIZEN)
    
                    Through:         Ms. Saniya Qadir, Advocate vice
                                     Mr. M.Y. Lone, Advocate
    
                                                            Vs.
                    SHOKWAT AHMAD KUTOO (REVENUE /                                     ...Respondent(s)
                    FOREST)
    
                    Through:         Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Cousel vice
                                     Mr. Mohsin S. Qadri, Sr. AAG
                    CORAM:
                    HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
                                                        ORDER
    

    31-07-2026

    01. The petitioner, through the medium of the present petition, alleges non-

    SPONSORED

    compliance of the interim order dated 23.08.2023 passed in WP(C)
    No.2195/2023 titled Mohammad Ismail Wagay vs. Union Territory of
    J&K and Ladakh
    . The operative portion of the said order is reproduced
    hereunder:

    “Subject to objections from the other side and till next
    date of hearing before the Bench, operation of impugned
    notice bearing No.544-46/ROG dated 09.08.2023 issued by
    respondent No.5 shall remain stayed.”

    02. A compliance report has been filed by the respondents, wherein it is
    stated that the matter was examined and it was noticed that eviction
    notice bearing No.DFO/TNG/LB/2023-24/2192-99 dated 10.01.2024
    had been issued inadvertently due to an oversight. It is further stated
    that the matter is presently sub-judice in view of the earlier notice
    issued by the Office of Range Officer, Gulmarg, which stands stayed by
    this Court in WP(C) No.2159/2023.

    Shameem Hamid Mir
    2026.08.04 11:34
    I attest to the accuracy and
    integrity of this document

    03. In view of the compliance report filed by the respondents and the stand
    taken therein, this Court is satisfied that the interim order dated
    23.08.2023 has been complied with in its letter and spirit. Accordingly,
    the contempt proceedings are closed.

    WP(C) No.2195/2023

    Reply has been filed by respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 7.

    Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing
    vice Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General, seeks and is
    granted four weeks’ time as a last and final opportunity to file reply, with
    an advance copy to learned counsel for the other side.

    List on 15.09.2026.

    (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
    JUDGE

    SRINAGAR
    31-07-2026
    Shameem H.

    Shameem Hamid Mir
    2026.08.04 11:34
    I attest to the accuracy and
    integrity of this document



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here