Md. Zamil Akhtar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 April, 2026

    0
    38
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Md. Zamil Akhtar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 April, 2026

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10144 of 2026
                            Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2018 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria
                     ======================================================
                     Md. Zamil Akhtar S/O Nijamudin R/O Village - Belwa Tengarmari, Police
                     Station - Jokihat, District - Araria
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                     The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap, Adv.
                     For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    3   22-04-2026

    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

    learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

    SPONSORED

    2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

    connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 265 of 2018 registered

    for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341,

    323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 379, 427, 279, 337, 504 of the Indian

    Penal Code .

    3. The petitioner is the owner of the Swift Desire

    which suffered an accident. The allegation is that large number

    of people gathered and the police was attacked.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

    petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

    case. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

    5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

    the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

    6. That there is no specific allegation against the
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10144 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026
    2/2

    petitioner, the incident seems to have happened in the aftermath

    of the accident. The petitioner is having clean antecedent. Thus,

    this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

    7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

    his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a

    period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

    released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

    Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

    satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

    Araria/concerned Court in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case

    No. 265 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under

    Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section

    482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

    8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

    prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

    adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

    shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

    and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

    manner.

    (Ansul, J)
    abhishekkr/-

    U      T
     



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here