Patna High Court – Orders
Md. Sonu vs The State Of Bihar on 29 April, 2026
Author: Rajesh Kumar Verma
Bench: Rajesh Kumar Verma
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78274 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- GALGALIYA District- Kishanganj
======================================================
Md. Sonu S/O Md. Junaid R/O Village- Lakrideepo, Bhatgaon, P.S.- Galgalia,
Dist.- Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83009 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- GALGALIYA District- Kishanganj
======================================================
Md. Ikbal S/O Md. Junaid R/O Village- Lakrideepo, Bhatgaon, P.S.- Galgalia,
Dist.- Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 78274 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
: Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83009 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
: Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
5 29-04-2026
Heard Mr. N.K.Agrawal, learned senior counsel for
the petitioners, Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, the learned A.P.P.
for the State (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 78274 of
2025) and Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, the learned A.P.P. for the
State (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 83009 of 2025).
2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78274 of 2025(5) dt.29-04-2026
2/4
26.06.2025 in connection with Galgaliya P.S. Case No. 52 of
2025, F.I.R. dated 25.06.2025 registered for the offence
punishable under Sections 8(c),21(c),29 of N.D.P.S. Act.
3. Recovery is of 260 Gms of brown sugar.
4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits
that petitioner, namely, Md. Sonu has clean antecedent and
petitioner, namely, Md. Ikbal carries one more case other than
the present one of similar nature and he is on bail in the said
case. They have falsely been implicated in the present case.
Further submits that it appears from the FIR that altogether 260
Gms of Brown Sugar was recovered from the house of the
petitioners, apart from the aforesaid, it appears from the FIR
itself that both the petitioners are own brothers which suggests
that the petitioners are involved in the present crime in question.
Further submits that there is non-compliance of the mandatory
provisions of the NDPS Act.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed
the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that it appears
from the FIR that altogether 260 Gms of Brown Sugar was
recovered from the house of the petitioners and there is
compliance of the mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, apart
from the aforesaid, the FSL report also confirms that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78274 of 2025(5) dt.29-04-2026
3/4
recovered contraband is Heroin.
Result of Examination
“Heroin, a diacetyl derivative morphine
was detected in the contents of the paper pudiya
marked A, B,C,D & E as described above in the
FSL Report.
Heroin is an addictive, intoxicating and
narcotics drug.”
6. Learned APP for the State further submits that the
recovered contraband is more than the commercial quantity so
there is embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act to enlarge
the petitioners on bail, apart from aforesaid, 42,190/- of Indian
Currency, 52,740/- of Nepali Currency and other articles were
also recovered from the house of the petitioners.
7. The grant of bail in NDPS cases where the recovery
of commercial quantity of narcotic is alleged is circumscribed
under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985,
Section 37 which says that before grant of bail, the Court must
have reason to believe that the petitioners have not committed
the offence and in the event of release they would not commit
similar offence.
8. The issue was considered by the Hon’ble Supreme
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78274 of 2025(5) dt.29-04-2026
4/4
Court in the case of State of Kerala and Ors Vs. Rajesh &
Ors, reported in 2020(12) SCC 122 as well as in the case of
Narcotic Control Bureau Vs.Mohit Aggarwal reported in
AIR 2022 SC 3444 and recently decided the judgment in the
case of Union of India Vs. Ajay Kumar Singh @ Pappu,
reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 346.
9. The recovery of huge quantity of Brown Sugar
from possession of the petitioners would not justify that the
petitioners had no knowledge of the narcotic nor there is any
material to substantiate that the petitioners would not commit
such offence in the event of release.
10. Hence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners
on bail in connection with Galgaliya P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025,
pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special
Judge(NDPS Act), Kishanganj.
11. Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T