M/S Unique Security & Another vs Maan Singh Gautam & Others on 20 July, 2026

    0
    2
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

    SPONSORED

    Petitioner is the employer. An application
    was filed against her by her workmen under Payment
    of Wages Act, alleging that they have not been paid
    wages for certain period. Notices were sent to
    petitioner on their application, however, when despite
    repeated notices, no one appeared on behalf of
    employer, the Prescribed Authority passed an order
    on 28.11.2017 for proceedings ex parte in the
    matter. Ultimately, the application filed by the
    workmen (respondents herein) was allowed by the
    Prescribed Authority, vide order dated 15.6.2018, and
    petitioner was asked to pay the arrears of wages
    amounting to ₹85,000 and compensation amounting
    to ₹21,250, total ₹1,06,250. Petitioner thereafter
    moved an application for restoration on 21.7.2018,
    which was rejected by the Prescribed Authority, vide
    order dated 28.11.2018. Petitioner thereafter appears
    to have filed another application seeking restoration
    on 22.11.2024, which has been rejected by the
    Prescribed Authority/Deputy Labour Commission, vide

    UKHC010125182026

    2026:UHC:6051
    order dated 20.6.2026. In this writ petition, petitioner
    has challenged the order dated 20.6.2026, passed on
    second restoration application of petitioner. Petitioner
    has also challenged the original order passed by the
    Prescribed Authority on 15.6.2018 and also the order
    dated 28.11.2017, whereby the Prescribed Authority
    had directed to proceed ex parte.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here