M/S Ramdev Construction vs Union Of India on 29 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    The present application has been filed by the applicant under Section
    11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as
    ‘the Act of 1996’ for the sake of brevity) for appointment of an arbitrator to
    resolve the dispute arose between the parties pursuant to the Contract dated
    03.06.2019.

    2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant entered into a works

    SPONSORED

    contract with the respondent-Union of India, which is governed by the Bid
    Document and the General Conditions of Contract (GCC), containing an
    arbitration clause under Clause 27(2) of the Bid Document read with Clause
    70 of the GCC. Disputes arose between the parties regarding execution of the
    contract and the respondent illegally terminated the agreement. Despite
    repeated requests, the respondents failed to constitute the Dispute Resolution

    NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:57674

    2 AC-34-2026
    Board or initiate the agreed dispute resolution mechanism. Applicant
    invoked the arbitration clause and, by communications dated 12.04.2025 and
    legal notice dated 23.12.2025, requested the respondents to appoint an
    arbitrator and nominated Former Judge of the High Court of Madhya
    Pradesh, as its nominee arbitrator. However, the respondents failed to
    respond or appoint an arbitrator within the stipulated period. In view of the
    respondents’ failure to act in accordance with the arbitration agreement, the
    applicant has invoked the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here