Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Laxman Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 August, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:36471]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10185/2026
CNR: RJHC010740552026 | URN: CRLMB / 22314U / 2026
Laxman Singh S/o Nahar Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Vani,
Police Station Gogunda, District Udaipur (Lodged In Central Jail,
Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9752/2026
CNR: RJHC010715812026 | URN: CRLMB / 21291U / 2026
Virendra Alias Vijju S/o Pansingh, Aged About 22 Years, Resident
Of Khandavali Ghotach, Thana Khamnor, District Rajsamand.
(Presently Lodged At Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rawal
Mr. JVS Deora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP
Mr. Abhishek Charan for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL
Order
04/08/2026
1. These applications for bail have been filed by the petitioners
under Section 483 of BNSS (old Section 439 of Cr.P.C.). The
requisite details of the matters are tabulated herein below:
S.No. Particulars of the Case
(Uploaded on 04/08/2026 at 06:01:21 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/08/2026 at 08:43:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:36471] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10185/2026]
1. FIR Number 129/2026
2. Date of lodging FIR 03.04.2026
3. Concerned Police Station Gogunda
4. District Udaipur
5. Offences alleged in the FIR Sections 109(1), 309(6),
126(2) and 3(5) of BNS and
Sections 4 and 25 of Arms
Act.
6. Offences added, if any Sections 115(2), 61(2),
118(2) of BNS.
2. First bail application of the petitioner-Laxman Singh was
dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file after filing of the
chargesheet.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and false
allegations have been levelled against them. As a matter of fact,
the petitioners were not at all involved in the crime in question.
The injured-Shankar Lal was subjected to Test Identification
Parade wherein he was not able to identify the accused Manish,
Tikam and Virendra. Even otherwise, the principal allegation of
causing life threatening injury is upon co-accused Manish. The
allegation against the present petitioners is with regard to the
conspiracy and not of committing actual crime. Since the injured
has failed to identify the principal accused who committed crime,
therefore, involvement of the petitioners is prima facie not
established. Co-accused-Tikam has already been enlarged on bail
by the trial court. The petitioners-Laxman Singh and Virendra are
in judicial custody since 05.06.2026 and 14.04.2026 respectively,
and the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, they
deserve to be enlarged on bail.
(Uploaded on 04/08/2026 at 06:01:21 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/08/2026 at 08:43:55 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:36471] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10185/2026]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor so also learned counsel for the
complainant vehemently oppose these bail applications.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of this case and after perusing the challan papers
so also considering the facts that the injured-Shankar Lal has not
been able to identify the accused-Manish, Tikam and Virendra;
investigation has been concluded and challan has been filed; the
allegation against the petitioners is of conspiracy and not of actual
commission of crime; the petitioners-Laxman Singh and Virendra
are in judicial custody since 05.06.2026 and 14.04.2026
respectively; and that the prosecution has not expressed any
apprehension qua the petitioners fleeing away from justice, in
case they are enlarged on bail, in the considered opinion of this
Court, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the
petitioners behind the bars for an indefinite period as the trial will
take sufficiently long time. Thus, without expressing any opinion
on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that
these bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be
accepted.
7. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 of
BNSS are allowed. It is ordered that petitioners- Laxman Singh
S/o Nahar Singh and Virendra Alias Vijju S/o Pansingh,
shall be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR;
provided they execute personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to
(Uploaded on 04/08/2026 at 06:01:21 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/08/2026 at 08:43:56 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:36471] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10185/2026]
the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before
that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called
upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(SUNIL BENIWAL),J
76/Ajay Singh
(Uploaded on 04/08/2026 at 06:01:21 PM)
(Downloaded on 04/08/2026 at 08:43:56 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
