Khoisnam Ibohal Singh vs State Of Manipur on 25 March, 2026

    0
    34
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Manipur High Court

    Khoisnam Ibohal Singh vs State Of Manipur on 25 March, 2026

    Author: A. Guneshwar Sharma

    Bench: A. Guneshwar Sharma

    OINAM Digitally                                                         Item no. 113
           signed by
    
    THOIB OINAM
           THOIBA MEITEI   IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
    A      Date:
           2026.03.26                AT IMPHAL
           14:13:33
    MEITEI +05'30'
                               MC(Crl. A.) No. 42 of 2025
    
    Khoisnam Ibohal Singh
                                                                          ... Applicant
                                          - Versus -
    
    State of Manipur
                                                                       ... Respondent
    
                                  B E F O R E
                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
    
                                          ORDER
    

    25.03.2026

    [1] Heard Mr. I. Denning, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.
    H. Samarjit, learned PP assisted by Mr. Y. Robert, learned Dy. GA for the State
    respondent.

    SPONSORED

    [2] The present application has been filed by the applicant who has
    been convicted Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 by judgment & order dated
    08.07.2025 passed by Ld. Judge, FTSC No. 2, Manipur, in Special Trial (POCSO)
    Case No. 16/22/19/20/02 of 2025 and vide order on sentence dated 10.07.2025,
    the applicant was directed to undergo 2(two) years rigorous imprisonment with
    a fine of Rs. 40,000/-(Rupees forty thousand) only and in default of payment of
    fine another simple imprisonment of 3(three) months. It is submitted that there
    is a delay of 18 days in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal against the order
    of conviction & sentence. It is also submitted that the delay is not intentional and
    non-deliberate and the 18 days delay has occurred in taking related documents
    and engaging new counsel.

    [3] Mr. H. Samarjit, learned PP submits that considering the days of
    delay, this Court may pass appropriate order.
    [4] This Court has perused the materials on record and it seems that
    the delay of 18 days is not deliberate and due to the reasons as stated in para
    nos. 4, 5 & 6 of the application.

    [5] Accordingly, MC(Crl.A.) No. 42 of 2025 is allowed and delay of 18
    days in filing the accompanying Criminal Appeal against the order of conviction
    and sentence is condoned.

    [6] Registry is directed to register the accompanying Criminal Appeal,
    if the same is in order and list in due course.

    JUDGE

    Thoiba



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here