― Advertisement ―

OPSC Civil Judge Recruitment 2026 Notification Released: Key Details Here

The Odisha Public Service Commission has officially released Advertisement No. 02 of 2026–27 inviting online applications for recruitment to the post of Civil...
HomeJagat Ram And Others vs P. Mukherjee And Others on 20 April,...

Jagat Ram And Others vs P. Mukherjee And Others on 20 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Jammu & Kashmir High Court

Jagat Ram And Others vs P. Mukherjee And Others on 20 April, 2026

                                                                   Sr. Nos. 6, 7 & 8

     HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                     AT JAMMU

                                                 CM No. 2130/2026 In
                                                 CM No. 2131/2026
                                                 CM No. 2132/2026
                                                 CPOWP No. 48/2009


Jagat Ram and others                                            .....Petitioner(s)

                      Through: Mr. R. K. S. Thakur, Advocate

                 Vs

P. Mukherjee and others                              ..... Respondent(s)
                    Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with
                             Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD. YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE

                                     ORDER

20.04.2026

1. Mr. Vishal Sharma, learned DSGI, appears and accepts notice in all the

SPONSORED

matters for the respondents.

2. Through the medium of the instant miscellaneous applications bearing

CM Nos. 2130/2026 and CM No. 2132/2026, the applicants namely, 1)

Tilak Raj aged 82 years S/o Late Sh. Ram Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P

H. No. 131, Panjtirthi, Jammu, 2) Smt. Krishan Devi aged 86 years W/o

Late Sh. Om Parkash R/o village Gordhi A/P H. No. 131, Panjtirthi,

Jammu, 3) Sh. Nikhilesh Sharma aged 32 years S/o Late Sh. Sunil Sharma

R/o Village Gordhi A/P H. No. 132, Panjtirthi, Jammu, 4) Smt. Surju Devi

aged 75 years W/o Late Sh. Dewan Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P

Kashirah Tehsil & District Udhampur, 5) Sh. Sathish Kumar aged 52

years W/o Late Sh. Dewan Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P Kashirah Tehsil
2 CM No. 2130/2026
[

& District Udhampur, 6) Sh. Ranjeet Kumar aged 47 years S/O late Sh.

Late Sh. Dewan Chand R/o Village Gordhi A/P Kashirah Tehsil & District

Udhampur, seek the release of the compensation amounts to the extent of

their respective shares as per the apportionment/acquaintance rolls which

stands already deposited by the respondents with the Registry of this Court

as mentioned in the order dated 20.04.2012, passed by this Court while

disposing of contempt application No. 48/2009 arising out of the main

petition OWP No. 543/2007. The said deposited amount is supposed to be

lying with the Registry of this Court under fixed deposit as per the

aforesaid order dated 20.04.2012.

3. The grievance of the applicants/petitioners in the main petition bearing

OWP No. 543/2007 titled “Jagat Ram & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors.

who include the present applicants or their predecessors was that a big

chunk of land measuring 1780 kanals and 9 marlas situated at Village

Priyan Gordi Sunthan & Thill of Tehsil and District Udhampur was

initially requisitioned under Defence of India Act, 1962 and subsequently

deemed to be requisitioned under the Provisions of J&K RAIP, Act, 1968

and rules 1969. That requisitional land was required for permanent use of

defence purposes for which necessary demand was placed by the indenting

department (Defence Estates) before the Deputy Commissioner Udhampur

for obtaining necessary “No Objection” from the State Government for

acquisition of the land. That the then State Government gave “No

Objection” to the acquisition of the requisitioned land in the year 1988.

That further action for completing the other requirements under the

provisions of the aforesaid Act and Rule was to be taken by the Defence
3 CM No. 2130/2026
[

Estates Department as well as by the Deputy Commissioner Udhampur.

However, acquisition proceedings could not take up immediately which

prompted the petitioners in the said petition to approach this Court for

redressal of their grievance. The said petition OWP No.543/2007 came to

be disposed of on the consensus of the learned counsel for the parties with

the direction to the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 to proceed in the matter without

any further delay and issue notification for acquisition of the land. The

exercise was directed to be done within a period of four weeks’, with the

direction to the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to take necessary steps for release

of the amount of compensation due to the petitioners under the provisions

of the law within a further period of two months.

4. The acquisition proceedings are reported to be still under dispute through

the medium of a separate petition before the High Court.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the present applicants/petitioners

that this Court vide order dated 20.04.2012 passed in the CPOWP

No. 48/2009 has given the liberty to the land owners to move motions for

the release of the compensation amount to the extent of their respective

shares that stands deposited in this Court as the agreed amount by the

Union of India.

6. It is submitted by the learned counsel that most of the land owners have

already approached this Court with motions for release of the compensation

amounts to the extent of their respective shares which have been released.

7. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India submitted that the

appropriate orders may be passed in the matter.

4 CM No. 2130/2026

[

8. Through the medium of the application bearing CM No.2131/2026, the

applicants who happen to be the legal heirs of the deceased/ land owner/

Sh. Krishan Chand seek the correction in the acquaintance

roll/apportionment statement to the effect of assessing their respective

shares out of the compensation that stands deposited as the share of Late.

Sh. Krishan Chand.

9. Perused all the three applications which are supported with affidavits. Also

perused the record of the disposed of contempt petition bearing No.

48/2009 as well as of earlier disposed of petition bearing OWP No.

543/2007.

10. Applications are allowed and the learned Registrar Judicial is directed to

release the compensation amount in favour of the applicants in CM Nos.

2130/2026 and 2132/2026 after proper verification to the extent of their

shares as per the acquaintance roll/apportionment statement. In case any

applicants/petitioners claim the compensation as the legal heirs of the

deceased land owners his/their respective shares should be got verified by

getting the acquaintance roll corrected from the office of the Deputy

Commissioner, Udhampur. The compensation amount is directed to be

released under rules and against proper acknowledgment, along with the

proportionate share of interest.

11. The applications are disposed of.

(Mohd. Yousuf Wani)
Judge
Jammu
20.04.2026
Mahavir



Source link