E. Srinivas Murthy @ Sri Nivas Murthy @ E. … vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 24 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    (hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned order’) passed

    in Complaint Case No. 4938(C) of 2017 by the learned

    SPONSORED

    A.C.J.M.-cum-Subordinate Judge-XVI, Patna, (hereinafter

    referred to as ‘Magistrate’) whereby cognizance has been taken

    for the offences punishable under Sections 384 and 504 of the

    Indian Penal Code, 1860 against the present petitioners and

    two other accused persons and summons have been directed

    to be issued against them.

    3. The prosecution case, in brief, as stated in

    complaint, is that O.P. No.2 (Complainant) had established a

    company in the name and style as ‘Otel Telecommunication

    Pvt. Ltd.’ at New Delhi in January, 2016 and the petitioners

    along with the co-accused had entered into a business

    arrangement with the company. It is alleged that even before

    commencement of the business, the accused persons started

    demanding return of their investment along with profit and,

    thereafter, began threatening O.P. No.2 and other directors. It

    is further alleged that on 15.11.2017, O.P. No.2 received a

    telephone call from the accused persons demanding Rs.50

    lakhs as rangdari and threatening to kill him in case of non-

    payment. It is also alleged that when O.P. No.2 approached
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20332 of 2018 dt.24-07-2026

    the local police station, the police refused to register the case,

    thereafter he filled complaint case bearing Complaint Case

    No. 4938(C) of 2017 before the learned Magistrate.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here