Deepak Alias Deepu vs State Of Uttarakhand on 2 April, 2026

    0
    28
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    Deepak Alias Deepu vs State Of Uttarakhand on 2 April, 2026

    Author: Ravindra Maithani

    Bench: Ravindra Maithani

     HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
               Fourth Bail Application No. 02 of 2026
    
     Deepak alias Deepu                             ........Applicant
    
                                  Versus
    
     State of Uttarakhand                          ........Respondent
    
     Present:-
           Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate for the applicant.
           Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.
           Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate for the informant,
     through video conferencing.
    
     Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
    

    Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial

    No.99 of 2020, State Vs. Deepak @ Deepu and others,

    SPONSORED

    arising out of FIR No.521 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148,

    149, 452, 307, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Laksar,

    District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

    2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and

    perused.

    3. This is the fourth bail application. The first bail

    application, being BA1 No.831 of 2021, was allowed on

    06.04.2021, but it was subsequently cancelled on

    29.04.2022. The second bail application, being BA2 No.184

    of 2022, was rejected on 03.03.2023. The third bail

    application, being BA3 No.53 of 2024, was also rejected on

    25.02.2025.

    2

    4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant

    that post rejection of the earlier bail applications, co-

    accused Nitin has already been granted bail by this Court on

    13.03.2026; in fact, earlier, the applicant was granted bail,

    but his bail was cancelled on the ground that subsequently,

    an FIR was lodged against him, but it is submitted that now

    the trial based on the subsequent FIR has ended in acquittal

    of the appellant. On this ground alone, co-accused has

    already been granted bail.

    5. These facts are not disputed by learned State

    Counsel.

    6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that

    it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be

    enlarged on bail.

    7. The bail application is allowed.

    8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his

    executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable

    sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the

    court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

    i) The applicant shall not approach the victim

    or any of the witnesses of the case either
    3

    personally or through any other person or

    electronically.

    ii) He shall not extend any kind of threats to

    the witnesses.

    iii) He shall not seek any adjournment in the

    trial, especially on the date when witnesses

    are present.

    (Ravindra Maithani, J)
    02.04.2026
    Ravi Bisht



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here