Bittu Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 17 March, 2026

    0
    32
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Leave granted.

    SPONSORED

    2. The appellant has been arraigned as the sole accused for

    the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376-E and 506

    of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, the ‘IPC’) read

    with Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act, 2000

    (for short, the ‘IT Act’). Respondent No.2 – prosecutrix,

    who has been issued notice, has chosen not to appear

    before this Court.

    3. The case of the prosecution against the appellant is that

    he had repeatedly committed the offence of rape upon the

    respondent No.2 – prosecutrix. Apart from committing the

    offence of rape, he also extended threats to the

    prosecutrix. The incidental charge is that he threatened

    to release the obscene video of committing the offence of

    rape as aforestated.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here