Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Complainant Sa vs The State Of Rajasathan … on 22 April, 2026
Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2026:RJ-JD:19010]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 677/2025
Complainant SA, Resident Of Basni Tamboliya,jodhpur, District,
Jodhpur (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasathan, Through Pp
2. Vi Alias Me S/o Omprakash, Aged About 11 Years, R/o
Ramdeo Nagar, Basni Tamboliya, Police Station, Mata Ka
Than, Jodhpur, Through, Thier Natural Guardian Father
Omprakash
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, AGA
Mr. Nishant Motsara
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
22/04/2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through
the order under assail passed by the learned Special Judge,
POCSO Court, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur whereby the order of
the learned Juvenile Justice Board has been set aside.
2. What is emanating from the material that the respondent
No.2 – juvenile below the age of 18 years committed an offence
under the penal provisions of POCSO Act. He was produced before
the Juvenile Justice Board and upon moving an application on his
behest for releasing the delinquent on bail, the same was
dismissed by the learned Board. Aggrieved of which, the guardian
of the juvenile moved an appeal. After hearing the parties, the
(Uploaded on 25/04/2026 at 10:43:58 AM)
(Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 08:45:37 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:19010] (2 of 2) [CRLR-677/2025]
learned Appellate Court acceded the prayer made in the appeal by
granting bail to the juvenile. Hence, this revision petition.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and feels
that indeed no error has been committed by the learned Appellate
Court in releasing the delinquent on bail. As per Section 12 of the
Juvenile Act, grant of bail is the rule and its denial is an exception,
which is confined to the circumstances enumerated in Section 12
itself and not beyond. Thus, the case appears to be devoid of
merits and the same deserves to be dismissed.
4. Accordingly, the instant revision petition, being devoid of
merit, stands dismissed.
5. Stay petition stands disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J
34-divya/-
(Uploaded on 25/04/2026 at 10:43:58 AM)
(Downloaded on 28/04/2026 at 08:45:37 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
