C528/241/2026 on 9 March, 2026

    0
    49
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Uttarakhand High Court

    C528/241/2026 on 9 March, 2026

                  Office Notes,
                 reports, orders
                 or proceedings
    SL.
          Date    or directions               COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
    No.
                 and Registrar's
                   order with
                   Signatures
                                   C528 No.241 of 2026
                                   Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
    

    Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the
    applicant.

    2. According to the applicant, the
    respondent instituted an application
    under Sections 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21
    and 22 of the Protection of Women from
    Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against the
    applicant and his family members before
    the Court of IIIrd Additional Chief Judicial
    Magistrate, Dehradun. The said
    application was partly allowed vide order
    dated 20.07.2024, whereby, apart from
    granting a protection order, the applicant
    was directed to pay a sum of ₹4,000/-
    per month towards maintenance to the
    respondent. It was further directed that
    in the event the respondent resides in
    rented accommodation, the expenditure
    towards rent shall be borne by the
    applicant. Subsequently, the respondent
    filed an execution application. The
    Executing Court, vide order dated
    03.06.2025, directed the applicant to pay
    a sum of ₹53,000/- to the respondent.
    Aggrieved by the said order dated
    03.06.2025, the applicant preferred a
    Criminal Appeal before the learned
    Sessions Judge, Dehradun. The learned
    Sessions Judge, Dehradun, vide
    judgment dated 31.01.2026, dismissed
    the said appeal. Hence, the present
    Criminal Miscellaneous Application.

    SPONSORED

    3. Learned counsel for the applicant
    submits that a bare perusal of the rent
    agreement would reveal that the stamp
    paper on which the said rent agreement
    has been executed was issued on
    09.10.2025, whereas the rent agreement
    itself is shown to have been executed on
    01.06.2025. On the basis of the
    aforesaid discrepancy, it is contended
    that the rent agreement is a forged and
    fabricated document and that the
    respondent is, in fact, residing with her
    parents and not in any rented
    accommodation. Learned counsel for the
    applicant further undertakes, on behalf
    of his client, that the applicant shall pay
    the maintenance amount of ₹4,000/- per
    month along with the arrears within a
    period of fifteen days from today.

    4. Issue notice to the respondent,
    returnable at an early date.

    5. List the matter after receipt of the
    service report.

    6. In the meanwhile, if the applicant
    pays the monthly maintenance of
    ₹4,000/- along with the arrears within
    fifteen days from today, the effect and
    operation of the impugned orders dated
    03.06.2025 and 31.01.2026, shall
    remain stayed, till the next date of
    listing.

    (Alok Mahra, J.)
    09.03.2026
    Arpan



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here