Ajay Paul vs The State Of Assam on 7 July, 2026

    0
    12
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gauhati High Court

    Ajay Paul vs The State Of Assam on 7 July, 2026

                                                                            Page No.# 1/2
    
    GAHC010132122026
    
    
    
    
                                                                      2026:GAU-AS:9463
    
                                THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
       (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
    
                                     Case No. : AB/1493/2026
    
                 AJAY PAUL
                 S/O- LATE CHITTA RANJAN PAUL, R/O- MANKACHAR BAZAR, P.S.
                 MANKACHAR, DIST SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM PIN-783131.
    
    
    
                 VERSUS
    
                 THE STATE OF ASSAM
                 REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM,
    
    
    
    Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MS. S. CHANDA,MS. U NANDA,MS. J
    GHOSH,MS A DAS,MS. R DEVI,MR. P S BISWAS,MS. K L R YANTHAN
    
    Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
    
    
    
    
                                         :: BEFORE ::
                     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
    
    
                                          O R D E R
    

    07.07.2026

    Heard the learned counsel Mr. S.C. Biswas appearing for the petitioner. Also
    Page No.# 2/2

    SPONSORED

    heard Mr. K. Baishya, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.

    2. This application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the
    petitioner, namely- Ajay Paul, who is apprehending arrest in connection with PR Case
    No.369/2025 (corresponding to Sukchar P.S. Case No.84/2023, under Sections
    120B
    /406/379 of the Indian Penal Code) pending before the court of learned Chief
    Judicial Magistrate, South Salmara, Mankachar.

    3. The gist of accusations in this case is that on 04.03.2023 one Prasad Ch. Ray had
    lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-Charge of Sukchar Police Station, inter alia,
    alleging that during an inquiry by the informant, it was found many cattle are missing
    from Go-Shala and pound and therefore, it was suspected that the cattle were stolen
    or disposed of otherwise.

    4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in this case, charge
    sheet has already been laid and the petitioner has received summons from the trial
    court and on 03.06.2026. The petitioner filed an application before the trial court
    seeking adjournment. He submits that the next date of the case is on 31.07.2026.

    5. On consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
    petitioner, this Court sees no apprehension of the petitioner getting arrested as the
    trial court only issued summons to him and the trial court is competent enough to
    consider the prayer for bail if such application is filed before the said court.

    6. Hence, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of with an observation that if
    so advised, the petitioner may move an application for bail before the trial court on
    the next date fixed on 31.07.2026. On his appearance before the trial court, same
    shall be considered as per law by the trial court.

    JUDGE

    Comparing Assistant



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here