― Advertisement ―

Narbada Prasad vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 April, 2026

Chattisgarh High Court Narbada Prasad vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 April, 2026 Author: Ramesh Sinha Bench: Ramesh Sinha ...
HomeMd. Zamil Akhtar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 April, 2026

Md. Zamil Akhtar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Patna High Court – Orders

Md. Zamil Akhtar vs The State Of Bihar on 22 April, 2026

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10144 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2018 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Zamil Akhtar S/O Nijamudin R/O Village - Belwa Tengarmari, Police
                 Station - Jokihat, District - Araria
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sarvesh Kashyap, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Matloob Rab, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   22-04-2026

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

SPONSORED

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 265 of 2018 registered

for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341,

323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 379, 427, 279, 337, 504 of the Indian

Penal Code .

3. The petitioner is the owner of the Swift Desire

which suffered an accident. The allegation is that large number

of people gathered and the police was attacked.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

case. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. That there is no specific allegation against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10144 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026
2/2

petitioner, the incident seems to have happened in the aftermath

of the accident. The petitioner is having clean antecedent. Thus,

this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a

period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Araria/concerned Court in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case

No. 265 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section

482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

manner.

(Ansul, J)
abhishekkr/-

U      T
 



Source link