23.03.2026 vs State Bank Of India on 23 March, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Himachal Pradesh High Court

    Date Of Decision : 23.03.2026 vs State Bank Of India on 23 March, 2026

    1 ( 2026:HHC:9112 )

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

    SPONSORED

    CMPMO No.52 of 2026
    Date of Decision : 23.03.2026

    M/s Kapoor Enterprises …Petitioner

    .

    
                                      Versus
    
        State Bank of India                                           ...Respondent
    
    
    
    
    
        Coram:
    

    The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma. Judge.

    of
    Whether approved for reporting?1

    For the petitioner : Mr. Hitender K. Thakur, Advocate.

                        rt
        For the respondents :           -
    
        Romesh Verma, Judge(oral)
    
    

    The present petition has arisen out of the

    order as passed by the learned Civil Judge, Karsog,District

    Mandi, dated 29.11.2025, whereby the application filed by the

    petitioner, under Section 148 of C.P.C to condone the delay in

    filing the written statement has been rejected.

    2. The facts of the case are that the

    plaintiff/respondent has filed a suit before the learned trial

    Court against the present petitioner. As per the paper book, it

    reveals that on 05.01.2024 notice issued to the defendant was

    received unserved and the plaintiff was directed to take fresh

    steps for the service of the defendant. On 05.01.2024, time was
    1
    Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

    ::: Downloaded on – 26/03/2026 20:31:05 :::CIS

    2 ( 2026:HHC:9112 )

    sought on behalf of the learned counsel for the defendant for

    filing written statement and the same was allowed and

    thereafter the matter was fixed on 03.05.2024.

    .

    On 03.05.2024, the counsel for the plaintiff

    submitted before the Court that there is possibility of

    compromise between the parties, therefore, on his request, the

    matter was adjourned for 11.05.2024. Thereafter, the parties

    of
    apprised the Court that compromise could not be effected and

    on 16.10.2024, time was granted to the defendant to file written
    rt
    statement subject to last opportunity and the matter was listed

    on 02.12.2024. Again on 07.04.2025, the parties informed the

    Court that there are chances of compromise between the parties

    and the learned Civil Judge, Karsog, District Mandi, posted the

    matter for effecting compromise before the National Lok

    Adalat.

    When the matter was listed before the National Lok

    Adalat on 10.05.2025, no compromise could be effected between

    the parties and consequently, the defendant filed an application

    under Section 148 of C.P.C for extension of time for filing

    written statement. The learned Civil Judge, Karsog, Mandi, vide

    its order dated 29.11.2025, dismissed the application with cost

    of Rs. 1000/-. and came to the conclusion that various

    ::: Downloaded on – 26/03/2026 20:31:05 :::CIS
    3 ( 2026:HHC:9112 )

    opportunities have been granted to the defendant for filing

    written statement, however, the needful has not been done.

    3. Feeling dissatisfied against impugned order, the

    .

    petitioner has approached this Court for setting-aside order

    dated 29.11.2025. The perusal of the record reveals that though

    various opportunities were granted to the defendant to file

    written statement. The fact remains that the parties apprised

    of
    the Court that there is possibility of compromise and for that

    purpose case was also listed before the National Lok Adalat,
    rt
    Karsog, Mandi. However, the same could not be effected.

    4. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case

    and as a matter of indulgence, time is extended for placing on

    record the written statement and the same is taken on record.

    However, the same shall be subject to the payment of cost of Rs.

    15,000/- to the plaintiff. Therefore, the impugned order is

    quashed and set-aside and the learned Civil Judge, Karsog

    Mandi is directed to take on record the written statement filed

    by the present petitioner/defendant. It is made clear that in

    case cost of Rs.15000/- is not paid by the defendant,in that

    event the impugned order shall revive. Learned Civil Judge,

    Karsog, Mandi is directed to take the matter on 07.04.2026 and

    ::: Downloaded on – 26/03/2026 20:31:05 :::CIS
    4 ( 2026:HHC:9112 )

    thereafter issues notices to both the parties and to proceed in

    the matter.

    5. In view of above, present petition stands disposed

    .

    off. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

    (Romesh Verma),

    Judge
    23.03.2026 (veena)

    of
    rt

    ::: Downloaded on – 26/03/2026 20:31:05 :::CIS



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here