Yaya Khan @ Mohammad vs State Of Odisha … Opposite Party on 23 March, 2026

    0
    33
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Orissa High Court

    Yaya Khan @ Mohammad vs State Of Odisha … Opposite Party on 23 March, 2026

    Author: G. Satapathy

    Bench: G. Satapathy

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                   BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    
       (In the matter of application under Section 483 of the
       BNSS, 2023).
    
       Yaya Khan @ Mohammad ...                      Petitioner
       Yousuf
                        -versus-
       State of Odisha             ...        Opposite Party
    
       For Petitioner          :   Mr. J.S. Samal, Advocate
    
       For Opposite Party      :   Mr. C. Mohanty, Addl. PP
    
                 CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
    
    DATE OF HEARING & DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23.03.2026 (ORAL)
    
    
    G. Satapathy, J.
    

    1. This is the bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS

    by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with

    SPONSORED

    Airport P.S. Case No.192 of 2025 corresponding to C.T.

    Case No.1043 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned

    JMFC (Cog. Taking-V), Bhubaneswar, for commission of

    offence punishable U/Ss.338/339/340/336(2) of BNS

    r/w.Sec.12/14/14-A of Foreigners Act.

    2. As per the allegation, the petitioner, who was

    detained at the Bhubaneswar, Airport after his arrival

    from Dubai in Flight No.6E-1448, was found upon

    Page 1 of 6
    BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    immigration verification to be an Afgan National having

    Afgan passport No. 0247655 and his original name to be

    Mohammad Yusuf, however, the passport/document

    shown by him discloses him to be Yaya Khan, S/o- Moti

    Khan, DOB- 20.05.1971, PP No. U1380251 with address

    Peyton Sahi, Buxibazar, Cuttack-753001, Odisha which

    is found to be false and he had allegedly been staying in

    India with forged and fabricated documents since

    25.10.2018. On this fact, FIR was lodged and the

    petitioner was taken into custody landing him before this

    Court in this bail application.

    3. Heard Mr. Jeet Swarup Samal, learned counsel

    for the petitioner and Mr. C. Mohanty, learned Addl. PP

    in the matter and perused the record.

    4. After having considered the rival submissions

    upon perusal of record, there appears allegation against

    the petitioner that he is an Afgan National and he by

    deliberate concealment of his original identity as

    Mohammad Yousaf is un-authorizedly staying in India by

    describing himself as Yaya Khan, a resident of Peyton

    Sahi, Cuttack with allegedly fake and forged passport.

    Page 2 of 6
    BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    Besides, it is stated in the FIR that the petitioner was

    allegedly found with Aadhaar Card, PAN Card, Driving

    License and certificate of Registration of Motor Cycle No.

    OD-05-AV-3286 at the time of his detention at Airport

    and all these documents are in the name of Yaya Khan.

    5. In the circumstance, the allegations raised

    against the petitioner are not only limited to a mere

    technical violation of immigration norms, but also

    indicate a case of deliberate concealment of identity and

    creating forged documents to obtain benefit of Indian

    citizenship to stay in India, however, the law makes a

    clear distinction between the lawful citizens and illegal

    migrants, but persons falling in the category of illegal

    migrants are prohibited to stay/reside in India without

    valid passport and visa. There is in fact allegation

    against a person like the petitioner in this case for

    forging passport, which is evident from the reply from

    Foreigners Regional Registration Office, Bureau of

    Immigration, Hyderabad vide its office letter dated

    18.09.2025 that the passport No.U1380251 and

    passport No.02457655 belongs to same person i.e. Yaya

    Page 3 of 6
    BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    Khan @ Mohammad Yousaf and both Yaya Khan @

    Mohammad Yousaf are single individual and the accused

    petitioner had arrived to Delhi, India through Afghan

    passport No.02457655 on 25.10.2018. It is not out of

    place to mention here that Section 9 of Foreigners Act,

    1946 provides that if there appears credible evidence

    before the Court raising a reasonable suspicion that the

    person is not an Indian citizen, the burden of proof shifts

    to that person to establish that he is not a foreigner and

    in this case, it is alleged that the petitioner being an

    Afghan National is un-authorizedly staying in India by

    forging Indian passport. This Court at this stage of

    consideration of bail does not decide the probative value

    of the documents, but the petitioner has been alleged to

    be possessing an Afghan passport as well as Indian

    passport, which was claimed to be forged, but the

    petitioner was also found with some Indian documents

    like Aadhaar Card, PAN Card and Driving License etc. in

    the name of Yaya Khan and the said documents cannot

    be ignored at this stage only to grant benefit of bail to

    the petitioner. Since it is alleged that the petitioner is

    Page 4 of 6
    BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    having forged passport, this Court has reasonable

    apprehension that the petitioner may abscond once he is

    released on bail.

    6. On the other hand, the petitioner although is

    said to have been issued with Indian documents, but it

    could not be established by him that he is an Indian

    citizen, however, merely because the petitioner is having

    some Indian documents such as Aadhaar Card, PAN

    Card and Driving License, the same cannot be treated as

    sufficient proof of his lawful citizenship at this stage,

    especially when he is allegedly found in possession of

    fake passport and the presumption as available under

    Section 9 of Foreigners Act, 1946. In view of the

    aforesaid facts and circumstances and taking into

    account the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged

    against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusation sought to

    be brought against him and regard being had to the

    materials placed on record and the petitioner being

    allegedly found with forged Indian passport and he being

    allegedly an Afghan National staying in India without any

    Page 5 of 6
    BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    valid passport and visa, this Court does not consider it

    prudent to grant bail to the petitioner.

    7. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner

    stands rejected. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed

    of. A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to

    the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

    (G. Satapathy)
    Judge

    Orissa High Court, Cuttack,
    Dated the 23rd day of March, 2026/S.Sasmal

    Signature Not Verified
    Digitally Signed
    Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL
    Designation: Jr. Stenographer
    Page 6 of 6
    Reason: Authentication
    Location: High Court of Orissa
    BLAPL No.11077 of 2025
    Date: 25-Mar-2026 13:58:28



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here