Xyz (Minor Victim) Thro Premjibhai … vs State Of Gujarat on 20 March, 2026

    0
    37
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Gujarat High Court

    Xyz (Minor Victim) Thro Premjibhai … vs State Of Gujarat on 20 March, 2026

                                                                                                                       NEUTRAL CITATION
    
    
    
    
                               R/SCR.A/3832/2026                                        ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026
    
                                                                                                                       undefined
    
    
    
    
                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
    
                              R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 3832 of 2026
    
                         ==========================================================
                                  XYZ (MINOR VICTIM) THRO PREMJIBHAI RAMAMBHAI ZALA
                                                         Versus
                                               STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                         ==========================================================
                         Appearance:
                         MS POONAM M MAHETA(11265) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                         MS JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                         ==========================================================
    
                            CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
    
                                                             Date : 20/03/2026
    
                                                               ORAL ORDER

    1. The present application has been preferred by the
    applicant-victim under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
    along with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
    Sanhita, 2023 as well as under the provisions of the Medical
    Termination of the Pregnancy Act, 1971
    , in connection with the
    FIR being No.11211035260088 of 2026 dated 13.03.2026
    registered with the Muli Police Station, Surendranagar for the
    offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(i), 65(1) of the
    Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(a), 4, 5(j)(ii), 6
    and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,
    for a direction to the respondent authority to terminate the
    pregnancy of the applicant-victim who is aged about 14 years 11
    months and 17 days, at the earliest, which is in the best interest
    of the victim considering her physical health and incident of rape
    causing grave injury to her mental health.

    2. On 17.03.2026, this Court passed the following order :-

    SPONSORED

    Page 1 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026

    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    “1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits
    that the petitioner is a victim of rape, aged about 14 years
    and 11 months. Due to this offence, she has attained
    pregnancy of 25 weeks and she does not wish to continue
    with the pregnancy and desires to have it terminated
    medically.

    2. Having regard to these aspects, let the prosecutrix be
    examined by a team of experts consisting of the Head of the
    Gynecology Department at C. U. Shah Medical College and
    Government Hospital, Surendranagar along with other team
    of experts appointed by the Head of Department Gynecology.

    3. The examination of the victim shall take place on
    18.03.2026. The committee shall submit its report as
    regards the risk factors involved in the medical termination
    of pregnancy to this Court on 20.03.2026.

    Direct service today is permitted.”

    4. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated
    17.03.2026, the learned APP received a report from the C. U.
    Shah Medical College, Surendranagar (Medical Board for
    Pregnancy Termination) dated 18.03.2026. On perusing the
    report, it appears that after examining the applicant-victim, the
    doctors from different branches/ departments found the
    applicant-victim in good health and carrying a single live
    intrauterine fetus with gestational age of 26 weeks 02 days.
    Therefore, they have opined that since the applicant-victim is
    carrying a live fetus of 26 weeks and 02 days, medical
    termination of pregnancy can be performed as per the guidelines
    of the MTP Amendment Act, 2021.

    5. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties and

    Page 2 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    considered the opinion/report submitted by the C. U. Shah
    Medical College, Surendranagar (Medical Board for Pregnancy
    Termination) dated 18.03.2026, as well as the written
    submission by the respondent no.1 – State.

    7. On hearing both the sides, this Court has noticed that the
    applicant-victim is alleged to have been raped by the accused
    named in the FIR being No.11211035260088 of 2026 dated
    13.03.2026 registered with the Muli Police Station,
    Surendranagar for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)

    (i), 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(a),
    4, 5(j)(ii), 6 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
    Offences Act.

    8. A panel of doctors have opined that the applicant-victim is
    already carrying about 26 weeks of pregnancy with a specific
    report/opinion of the empaneled doctors that medical
    termination of pregnancy can be performed as per the guidelines
    of the MTP Amendment Act, 2021.

    9. Learned APP has urged before this Court that the Court
    may, in a given set of circumstances, issue a direction for
    termination of pregnancy. However, the tissues from the fetus
    may be directed to be handed over for the purpose of DNA
    sampling in a scientific manner to the Investigating Officer.

    10. In the case of X vs. Union of India and Another
    (Miscellaneous Application No.2157 of 2023 in Writ Petition

    Page 3 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    (Civil) No.1137 of 2023), the Hon’ble Supreme Court has
    summarised the law regarding the medical termination of
    pregnancies. In paragraph-13, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has
    observed thus :

    “Medical termination of pregnancies

    13. The termination of pregnancies is governed by the MTP
    Act
    and the rules framed under it. The MTP Act is a
    progressive legislation which regulates the manner in which
    pregnancies may be terminated. Section 3 spells out certain
    conditions which must be satisfied before a pregnancy can
    be terminated. The conditions depend upon the length of the
    pregnancy. Where the length of the pregnancy does not
    exceed twenty weeks, one Registered Medical Practitioner
    must be of the opinion, formed in good faith, that:

    a. The continuance of the pregnancy would involve a risk
    to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury to her
    physical or mental health. The anguish caused by a
    pregnancy which occurs due to the failure of a contraceptive
    method is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the
    mental health of the woman; or

    b. There is a substantial risk that if the child were born,
    it would suffer from any serious physical or mental
    abnormality.

    Where any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to
    have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the
    pregnancy is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the
    mental health of the woman. The presumption adverted to in

    (a) above makes it evident that the MTP Act recognizes the
    autonomy of the pregnant woman and respects her right to
    choose the course of her life.

    14. Where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twenty
    weeks but does not exceed twenty-four weeks, two RMPs
    must be of the opinion discussed in the preceding
    paragraph. The categories of women where a pregnancy

    Page 4 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    beyond 20 weeks and up to 24 weeks may be terminated
    are permitted to be prescribed by rules made by the delegate
    of the legislature. Rule 3B of the MTP Rules (as amended in
    2021) provides grounds for the termination of a pregnancy
    up to twenty-four weeks. The termination may be allowed in
    the following cases or for the following persons:

    a. Survivors of sexual assault or rape or incest;

                                  b.      Minors;
    
                                  c.      Change of marital status during the ongoing
                                          pregnancy (widowhood and divorce);
                                  d.      Women with physical disabilities with a major
    

    disability in terms of the criteria laid down under the
    Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016;
    e. Mentally ill women including mental retardation;
    f. Foetal malformation that has a substantial risk of
    being incompatible with life or where in the event of
    birth, the child may suffer from physical or mental
    abnormalities and be seriously handicapped; and
    g. Women with pregnancy in humanitarian settings or
    disaster or emergency situations as may be declared
    by the Government.

    In X v. Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family
    Welfare, GNCTD
    , this Court held that the benefits of Rule
    3B(c) extend equally to both single and married women and
    that the benefits of Rule 3B extend to all women who
    undergo a change in their material circumstances.

    15. Significantly, if in the opinion of an RMP, the
    termination of a pregnancy is immediately necessary to save
    the life of a pregnant woman, the provisions of Section 3
    which relate to the length of the pregnancy and the opinion
    of two RMPs shall not apply. Section 4 (which concerns the
    place at which a pregnancy may be terminated) shall not
    apply to such cases as well. The design of the statute makes
    it evident that saving the life of the pregnant woman is of
    paramount importance, notwithstanding the length of the
    pregnancy.

    16. Further, the provisions of Section 3(2) relating to the

    Page 5 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    length of the pregnancy shall not apply to the termination of
    a pregnancy by an RMP, where such termination is
    necessitated by the diagnosis of any of the substantial
    foetal abnormalities diagnosed by a Medical Board. The
    Medical Board has the power to allow or deny the
    termination of a pregnancy the length of which is beyond
    twenty-four weeks. It may do so only after ensuring that the
    procedure would be safe for the woman at that gestation
    age and after considering whether the foetal malformation
    leads to a substantial risk of the foetus being incompatible
    with life, or where the child (if it is born) may suffer from
    such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously
    handicapped. Therefore, the outer temporal limit within
    which a pregnancy may be terminated is lifted in some
    cases.”

    11. The learned advocate appearing for the applicant-victim,
    relying upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
    case of XYZ vs. The State of Gujarat & Ors (SLP (Cri) Dy.
    No.33790 of 2023, decided on 21.08.2023), has submitted that
    the Supreme Court, in paragraphs-10, 12 & 14, held as under :

    “10. We find that in the absence of even noticing the
    aforesaid portion of the report, the High Court was not right
    in simply holding that “the age of the foetus is almost 27
    weeks as on 17.08.2023 and considering the statements
    made by the learned advocate for the petitioner-victim and
    the averments made in the application the petition for
    medical termination of pregnancy stands rejected”, which, in
    our view is ex facie contradictory. Being aggrieved by the
    said order the appellant has knocked the doors of this Court
    seeking expeditious relief.

    12. Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 19.08.2023
    as extracted hereinabove, the report of the Medical
    Superintendent, Dr.Kiran C.Patel Medical College &
    Research Institute, Bharuch and Chief District Medical
    officer-cum-Civil surgeon General Hospital, Bharuch, Gujarat
    has been placed on record, which states that the petitioner’s

    Page 6 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    pregnancy is of 27 weeks 2 days +/- 2 weeks duration and
    the live intrauterine foetus weights around 1088 grams as
    per the ultra sonography done on 19.08.2023. Paragraphs 3
    to 6 of the report reads as under :-

    “3. There is no indication for termination of
    pregnancy as per Maternal Physical Health but as per
    history given by survivor this pregnancy is due to
    sexual assault with her, continuation of this pregnancy
    can affect her mental health and in addition survivor
    want to terminate pregnancy; Medical Termination of
    Pregnancy (MTP) at this stage of pregnancy can be
    done in this hospital if Honourable Court Permits.

    4. In that case the Medical Termination of
    Pregnancy would be done first by induction of Labour
    and if indicated then by Hysterotomy procedure after
    taking consent of survivor & explaining due risks to
    maternal health and fetal outcome.

    5. At present the survivor is clinically fit for above
    mentioned procedure.

    6. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy would not
    adversely affect child bearing capacity and General
    Health of the survivor in future.”

    14. In Suchita Srivastava vs. State (UT of Chandigarh)
    (2009) 9 SCC 1, this Court expressed that the right of a
    woman to have reproductive choice is an insegregable part
    of her personal liberty, as envisaged under Article 21 of the
    Constitution. She has a sacrosanct right to her bodily
    integrity.

    Page 7 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026

    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    12. In the case of Minor R through Mother H vs. State of
    NCT of Delhi and Another
    (W.P. (Cri) No.221 of 2023,
    decided on 25.01.2023), the Delhi High Court held as under :

    “12. In the case of sexual assault, denying a women right
    to say no to medical termination of pregnancy and fasten
    her with responsibility of motherhood would amount to
    denying her human right to live with dignity as she has a
    right in relation to her body which includes saying Yes or No
    to being a mother. Section 3(2) of the MTP Act reiterates that
    right of a woman. To force the victim to give birth to child of
    a man who sexually assaulted would result in
    unexplainable miseries.

    One will shudder to think what a victim who is carrying
    such fetus in her womb must be going through each day,
    being reminded constantly of the sexual assault that she
    has undergone. Cases where sexual assault results into
    pregnancy of the victim are even more traumatic as the
    shadow of such tragic moment lingers on each day with the
    victim. It is this mental agony which has been taken into
    account by the MTP Act which lays emphasis on not only
    grave physical injury but also mental health of a pregnant
    woman. It therefore provides under Section 3(2)(i) that if the
    continuance of pregnancy would involve grave injury to the
    mental health of a pregnant woman, she can legitimately
    seek to terminate the same. In furtherance of the same
    intent, Section 3(2) Explanation 2 of the MTP Act provides
    that –

    “Explanation 2.- Where any pregnancy occurs as a
    result of failure of any device or method used by any
    married woman or her husband for the purpose of
    limiting the number of children, the anguish caused by
    such unwanted pregnancy may be presumed to
    constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the
    pregnant woman.”

    The present case stands covered under this explanation.

    Page 8 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026

    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    14. This Court takes note of the fact that Article 21 of the
    Constitution of India dealing with right to life invariably
    includes a life lived with dignity. The child herein is a victim
    of rape. Termination of pregnancy in cases, like present one,
    cannot be reduced merely to be defined as right of a woman
    sexually assaulted, but also to be recognized as a human
    right, as it affects dignified existence of a victim if the same
    is not permitted. It is not the privacy of the rape victim which
    is invaded by sexual assault, but her body is wounded and
    her soul is scared. It would not be appropriate to expect the
    minor victim who is a rape victim to take the burden of giving
    birth and raising a child, especially in a situation where she
    herself is passing through the age of adolescent. Doing so,
    will amount to asking a child to give birth and raise another
    child. Given the social, financial, and other factors that are
    immediately associated with the pregnancy, an unwanted
    pregnancy would surely have an impact on victim’s mental
    health.”

    13. At this stage, it would be profitable to refer to the decision
    of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, wherein ‘the best interest’ theory
    for the victim is settled. Moreover, considering the medical
    opinion given by the Medical Board as well as considering the
    trauma, mental agony and possible social ostracism which the
    applicant-victim has to undergo, this Court is inclined to allow
    the prayer for medical termination of the pregnancy.

    14. Since the pregnancy of the applicant-victim exceeds 26
    weeks as of now, the Court directs three senior most
    Gynecologists of the C. U. Shah Medical College, Surendranagar
    (Medical Board for Pregnancy Termination), to examine the
    applicant-victim and also by a Psychologist attached to the Civil
    Hospital, Surendranagar. The said team of doctors shall examine
    the applicant-victim, and after having interaction with her,
    undertake the procedure of surgery on urgent basis along with

    Page 9 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    other required expert doctors like Physician, Anesthetic etc., if
    otherwise, there is unanimity amongst the doctors to the effect
    that such termination would be carried out safely.

    15. Considering the fact that each day’s delay will add to the
    victim’s agony, the following directions are issued :

    (i) The victim is permitted to get the pregnancy
    terminated at the Civil Hospital, Surendranagar. The
    termination of pregnancy be carried out with all the
    necessary medical facilities available at the disposal of the
    Hospital and on ensuring proper care in pre-termination
    and post termination periods.

    (ii) On production of this order, the Superintendent of
    the Civil Hospital, Surendranagar, shall take immediate
    measures for constituting a medical team for conducting
    the procedure.

    (iii) the victim shall file an appropriate undertaking,
    authorizing to conduct the surgery at her risk.

    (iv) If the baby is alive at birth, the hospital shall ensure
    that the baby is offered the best medical treatment
    available, so that it develops into a healthy child.

    (v) If the victim is not willing to assume the
    responsibility of the baby, the State and its agencies shall

    Page 10 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026
    NEUTRAL CITATION

    R/SCR.A/3832/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

    undefined

    assume full responsibility and offer medical support and
    facilities to the child, keeping in mind the best interests of
    the child and the statutory provisions in the Juvenile
    Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2005
    .

    (vi) The doctors shall take the necessary tissue samples
    from the DNA identification by following the scientific
    practice for DNA identification and such samples shall be
    handed over to the Investigating Officer concerned.

    16. The learned APP shall communicate about this order to the
    Civil Hospital, Surendranagar, forthwith. A copy of this order
    shall also be sent by the Registry to the Chief District Medical
    Officer-cum-Civil Surgeon, General Hospital, Surendranagar.

    17. With above directions, the present petition stands disposed
    of. Direct service today is permitted.

    (M. R. MENGDEY,J)
    AHS

    Page 11 of 11

    Uploaded by MR.AMIT HEMANTKUMAR SONAGARA(HCD0079) on Fri Mar 20 2026 Downloaded on : Sat Mar 21 00:40:27 IST 2026



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here