X. Y. Z. vs Maasaheb Meentai Thakre Hospital Nerul … on 21 March, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Bombay High Court

    X. Y. Z. vs Maasaheb Meentai Thakre Hospital Nerul … on 21 March, 2026

    Author: Bharati Dangre

    Bench: Bharati Dangre

    2026:BHC-AS:13557-DB
    
    
    
                                                                                          1-WP-3611-2026.odt
    
    
                    rajshree
    
             Digitally
             signed by
             RAJSHREE
                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
    RAJSHREE KISHOR
    KISHOR   MORE
    MORE     Date:
             2026.03.21
             13:42:47
                                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
             +0530
    
    
                                                        WRIT PETITION NO.3611 OF 2026
    
    
                                X.Y.Z. Through her father                           ....Petitioner
                                                 V/S
                                Maasaheb Meenatai Thakre
                                Hospital Nerul & Ors.                               ....Respondents

    Mr.Sarvesh Deshpande a/w Ms.Mansi Dande for the Petitioner.
    Mrs.M.P. Thakur, AGP for the State.

    Ms.Anjali Helekar a/w Mr.Advait Helekar for Respondent No.2.

    SPONSORED

    CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE &
    MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ

    DATE : 21st MARCH 2026
    (IN CHAMBER)

    Oral Judgment (Per Bharati Dangre J) :

    1 Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

    2 In furtherance of our order dated 18/03/2026, Mrs. M.P.
    Thakur, the learned Government Advocate has produced before
    us the report of examination of the minor girl, represented
    through her father.

    The report under the signature of Civil Surgeon, Civil
    Hospital thane dated 20/03/2026 inform that in terms of the
    directions of this Court, the District Medical Board was

    1/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 21/03/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 21/03/2026 20:30:16 :::
    1-WP-3611-2026.odt

    constituted under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act,
    1971
    , under the Chairmanship of Civil Surgeon , with two
    Gynecologists as well as Radiologist, Pediatrician and
    Psychologist being its members.

    It is informed that the girl was examined on 19/03/2026
    and after due examination and and consideration of all medical
    findings, the District Medical Board has prepared its report.

    3 The Report forwarded to the Court dated 20/03/2026 is
    taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.

    It is accompanied with Form D, which is the report about
    the medical termination beyond 24 weeks. The Gynecology
    Department has specifically expressed its opinion as below :

    “Patient is unmarried 14 years old with single viable fetus in
    cephalic presentation.

    As Ultrasound on 19.03.2026 suggestive of gravid uterus with live
    single viable fetus in cephalic presentation, 28 weeks, with foetal
    weight 1159 gm + 173 gm.

    If terminated at this stage baby may born alive and need NICU
    care.”

    Similar is the opinion expressed by the Pediatric
    Department.

    The Radiology Department has specifically indicated that
    the Ultrasonography of gravid shows a single viable fetus in in
    cephalic presentation with average gestational age of 28 weeks.

    4 The opinion of the Medical Board for termination of
    pregnancy is in the positive and the justification is to the
    following effect :-

    2/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 21/03/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 21/03/2026 20:30:16 :::

    1-WP-3611-2026.odt

    “6) Opinion by Medical Board for termination of pregnancy – Allowed.

    After taking detailed history and conducting thorough clinical
    examination, and review of reports by the Gynaecologist, Radiologist,
    Paediatrician, and Psychiatrist, the District Medical Board, Thane has
    formed the following opinion:

    As per ultrasonography dated 19/03/2026 & 20/03/2026, there is a single
    live intrauterine fetus of gestational age 28 weeks, with estimated fetal
    weight of 1159 gm ± 173 gm, in cephalic presentation with no gross fetal
    anomaly.

    Continuation of pregnancy may lead to pregnancy related complications
    like Anaemia, pregnancy induced Hypertensions as well as complication
    during labour. It is also going to have Psychological impact on pregnant
    mother (minor) with uncertain future.

    Pregnant mother (minor) and her mother have expressed desire to
    terminate the pregnancy and are made aware of the dangers of
    continuation of pregnancy as well as termination of pregnancy. Surgical
    intervention might required. After termination of pregnancy at this stage
    baby may delivered alive and baby may require NICU Care. And this
    situation explained to her relatives.

    Since the pregnancy has advanced to 28 weeks, well beyond legal limits of
    termination of pregnancy i.e. 24 weeks. The termination can only be done
    with Hon’ble Court permission.

    7) Physical fitness of the woman for the termination of pregnancy – Yes.”

    5 The Petitioner’s father is present before us and we again
    inquired with him about the termination of pregnancy and in no
    uncertain terms he made it clear that the pregnancy be
    terminated as his daughter is minor and the pregnancy is
    unwarranted. We are also informed that the girl is already
    hospitalized in Civil Hospital, Thane.

    6 In the wake of aforesaid, since the minor girl through her
    father had made a clear choice of terminating the unwarranted
    pregnancy by exercising her right not to give birth to the child,

    3/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 21/03/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 21/03/2026 20:30:16 :::
    1-WP-3611-2026.odt

    and the District Medical Board is in favour of termination of the
    pregnancy, as it is indicated that continuation of the pregnancy
    may lead to pregnancy related complications like anemia
    alongwith hyper-tension as well as complications during labor
    plus it will also have psychological impact upon the mother with
    uncertain future.

    Since the minor girl alongwith her father has expressed
    desire to terminate the pregnancy, they were made aware about
    the dangers of continuation of pregnancy as well as termination
    and it was also indicated that surgical intervention might be
    required. However, since the consensus is expressed to undergo
    the procedure, we permit the pregnancy of 28 weeks to be
    terminated and we direct the Civil Hospital, Thane to start the
    procedure forthwith, as we are informed that the minor girl is
    admitted in the hospital.

    We also make it clear that if the baby is born alive and need
    NICU care, the hospital shall arrange for the same with no
    liability being fastened upon the family of the minor girl. The
    child is permitted to be then dealt with, in accordance with law.

    With the abovesaid directions, Writ Petition is allowed.

    [MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.] [BHARATI DANGRE, J.]

    4/4

    ::: Uploaded on – 21/03/2026 ::: Downloaded on – 21/03/2026 20:30:16 :::



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here