― Advertisement ―

HomeVivek Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 2026

Vivek Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 2026

Patna High Court

Vivek Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 10 March, 2026

Author: Alok Kumar Sinha

Bench: Alok Kumar Sinha

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2684 of 2026
     ======================================================
     Vivek Kumar S/O Shree Lal Babu Singh, R/o Village- Chak Singar Barari
     P.S.- Jurawanpur, Block- Raghopur, District- Vaishali.

                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                      Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Development Department,
     Patna.
2.   The Commissioner, MGNREGA, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.
4.   The Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali at Hajipur.
5.   The District Program Officer, (MGNREGA), Vaishali at Hajipur.
6.   The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali.
7.   The Block Development Officer, Block- Raghopur, Vaishali.
8.   The Block Program Officer, (MGNREGA), Block- Raghopur, Vaishali.
9.   The Technical Assistant, (MGNREGA), Block- Raghopur, Vaishali.
10. The Junior Engineer, Department (MGNREGA) Block- Raghopur, Vaishali.
11. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Chak Singar, Block- Raghopur, Vaishali.
12. The Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj Chak Singar, Block- Raghopur,
    Vaishali.
13. The Panchayat Rojgar Sevak, Gram Panchayat Raj Chak Singar, Block-
    Raghopur, Vaishali.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Adv
     For the State          :       Mr. P.K. Verma, Addl. Advocate General (03)
                                    Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG 3
     For Res. No. 11        :       Mr. Ranjeet Choubey, Adv
                                    Mr. Jainandra Kumar, Adv
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

Date : 10-03-2026
The petitioner, Vivek Kumar has filed this writ petition

in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, seeking for following

reliefs:

Patna High Court CWJC No.2684 of 2026 dt.10-03-2026
2/5

(i) For issuance of a writ in the
nature of mandamus commanding the
Respondents forthwith to court-monitored
independent enquiry into large-scale
irregularities, defalcation, embezzlement and
misappropriation of public funds under the
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act, 2005
(MGNREGA) in the
Gram Panchayat Raj Chak Singar, Block-

Raghopur, District- Vaishali, committed by the
sitting Mukhiya in connivance with the public
officials, thereby defeating the very object of
the welfare legislation.

(ii) For issuance of any other
appropriate writ/order/direction to the concern
respondent for recovery of misappropriated
public money from the Mukhiya and erring
officials.

(iii) For issuance of any other
appropriate writ/order/direction for lodging of
F.I.Rs. under provision of Bhartiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 and Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988
against all responsible persons.

(iv) For issuance of any other
appropriate writ/order/direction for a special
social audit of all MGNREGA works of the last
five years of Panchayat Raj- Chaksingar,
Raghopur Block, District- Vaishali.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2684 of 2026 dt.10-03-2026
3/5

(v) For issuance of any other
appropriate writ/order/direction to the concern
respondent to stay further release of funds
under MGNREGA of Panchayat Raj-

Chaksingar, Raghopur- Block, District-
Vaishali and preservation of all records, job
cards, muster rolls and bank details.

(vi) For issuance of any other
appropriate writ/order/direction for which
petitioner shall entitled under the facts and
circumstances of the case.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the

attention of this Court to various paragraphs of the writ petition to

demonstrate how the MGNREGA job cards have allegedly been

generated in the names of deceased persons and amounts have

been illegally credited to and withdrawn from their respective

bank accounts, thereby prima facie, indicating fabrication of

records and misappropriation of public funds. The learned counsel

further submits that several representations were submitted before

the concerned authority, however, no action has been taken thereon

till date.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the State, on the

other hand, pointed out that the petitioner is in the habit of filing

such representation and the latest representation has been brought
Patna High Court CWJC No.2684 of 2026 dt.10-03-2026
4/5

on record under Annexure-P/17 which is addressed to the

MGNREGA Commissioner, Rural Development Department,

Government of Bihar, dated 25.12.2025.

4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that subsequent to the submission of the aforesaid

application before the Commissioner, MGNREGA Bihar, Patna, an

enquiry report dated 04.01.2026 was received by him, wherein

the complaint was closed by holding that the complainant has

described various irregularities under MGNREGA only in general

terms without specifying any particular scheme or beneficiary, and

therefore, no action could be taken on the said complaint.

5. The Court has perused the representation filed by the

petitioner and finds that the detailed manner in which the

averments have been taken giving the instances, has not been

highlighted in the representation. In view of the aforesaid

circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of giving

liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the

concerned authority, clearly highlighting the specific instances and

documentary proof in support of the same which would be

considered by the authority in accordance with law. Upon receipt

of such representation, the authorities are at liberty to give

personal hearing to the petitioner, if the same is necessary. Learned
Patna High Court CWJC No.2684 of 2026 dt.10-03-2026
5/5

counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation shall be

filed within a period of two weeks from today with a copy of the

order passed today. If any such representation with the copy of the

order is received by the Authority, the same shall be disposed of

preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt

of such representation.

6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

Pending Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall also stand

disposed of.

(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)

( Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                 N/A
Uploading Date           11.03.2026
Transmission Date        N/A
 



Source link