Malkiat Singh Alias Mittu vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 10 March, 2026

    0
    21
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of regular bail by the Special Judge, NIA, Punjab vide
    order dated 03.10.2024, the appellant had come up before this Court by filing the present
    appeal under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.

    SPONSORED

    1 of 22

    CRA-D-1600-2024 (O&M)

    2. In paragraph 14 of the appeal, the appellant declares that he has no criminal
    antecedents.

    3. The appellant’s counsel submits that the appellant would have no objection
    whatsoever to any stringent conditions that this Court may impose, including that if the
    appellant repeats the offense or commits any non-bailable offense which provides for a
    sentence of imprisonment for more than seven years, the State may file an application to
    revoke this bail before the concerned Court having jurisdiction over this FIR, which shall
    have the authority to cancel this bail, and to which the appellant shall have no objection.
    Counsel for the appellant further submits that he shall not use his right of speech and
    expression beyond what is permitted under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here