Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Vinod Singh S/O Shri Umrao Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 July, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:28698]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8532/2026
CNR: RJHC020523262026 | URN: CRLMB / 15519U / 2026
Vinod Singh S/o Shri Umrao Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Village Khaarpa Khurd, Ps Pidawa, District Jhalawar (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order
24/07/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.135/2019
registered at Police Station-Pirawa, District-Jhalawar for the
offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323 and 302 of IPC,
the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under
Section 482 BNSS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned
Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits
that in the present matter, charge-sheet has already been filed, in
which the petitioner was not arrayed as an accused. However, on
the application filed by the complainant-Gopal Singh, the learned
trial Court, by exercising powers under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C.,
has taken cognizance against the petitioner vide order dated
(Uploaded on 27/07/2026 at 02:27:05 PM)
(Downloaded on 28/07/2026 at 12:06:14 AM)
[2026:RJ-JP:28698] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8532/2026]
24.01.2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner has
preferred a revision petition against the said order before the
competent Court, which is still pending for consideration. Despite
the pendency of the revision petition, the petitioner has been
summoned through an arrest warrant. It is further contended that
the petitioner is ready to face the trial and mere judicial custody
of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Therefore, it
is prayed that the anticipatory bail application filed by the
petitioner may kindly be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
application.
5. Considering the contentions advanced by learned counsel for
the petitioner and especially the fact that during the course of
investigation and even after filing a charge-sheet petitioner was
not found involved in commission of the offence thereafter,
cognizance has been taken against him on the application filed
under Section 319 Cr.P.C., but without expressing any opinion on
the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and
proper to dispose of this anticipatory bail application with direction
to the petitioner that he shall appear before the concerned Court
on or before 12.08.2026 and submit his bail bonds to the
satisfaction of the said Court. Concerned Court is directed to
accept the bail bonds of the petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. bail
application is disposed of.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J
52/Arun
(Uploaded on 27/07/2026 at 02:27:05 PM)
(Downloaded on 28/07/2026 at 12:06:14 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
