Bombay High Court
Vikas Kanhaiyalal Yadav vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 25 May, 2026
1
8-aba-850-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.850 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1651 OF 2026
Vikas Kanhaiyalal Yadav ...Applicant
Versus
VISHAL
SUBHASH The State of Maharashtra and Another ..Respondents
PAREKAR
Digitally signed by
VISHAL SUBHASH
PAREKAR
******
Date: 2026.05.26
11:02:19 +0530 Mr. I.K. Tripathi a/w. Bindvasini Yadav, for the Applicant in ABA.
Mr. Aditya Sharma i/b. Ms. Khushboo Jain, for the Applicant in
Interim Application.
Mr. Ajay Dubey a/w. Ms. Yogita Kanojiya, for the Intervener.
Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.
******
CORAM : SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.
DATE : 25th MAY, 2026
(VACATION COURT)
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. During the hearing of the application, it was pointed out by the
learned APP that there are several antecedents against the present
Applicant. Learned APP has placed on record the report filed by the
P.S.I., EOW, Palghar wherein it has been mentioned that there are six
antecedents against the present Applicant which the learned counsel
for the Applicant has failed to disclose in his application.
Vishal Parekar ....1 ::: Uploaded on - 26/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 26/05/2026 20:42:26 ::: 2 8-aba-850-2026.doc
3. As per the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of
Zeba Khan vs. State of U.P. and Ors. 1 the Applicant seeking bail at any
stage of the proceedings, is under obligation to disclose all material
particulars, including criminal antecedents.
4. Stand over to 1st June, 2026.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)
1 2026 Live Law (SC) 139.
Vishal Parekar ....2
::: Uploaded on - 26/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 26/05/2026 20:42:26 :::
