Advertisement
Advertisement

― Advertisement ―

HomeVeerabathini Amaladasu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 10 April, 2026

Veerabathini Amaladasu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 10 April, 2026

ADVERTISEMENT

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Veerabathini Amaladasu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 10 April, 2026

APHC010195912026
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                 AT AMARAVATI                   [3521]
                          (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL
                   TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

                               PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

                      WRIT PETITION NO: 9854/2026

Between:

  1.VEERABATHINI AMALADASU, S/O.BALA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45
    YEARS, OCC DAILY LABOUR,         R/O.SRIRAM GOLDNEST
    APPARTMENT, VEPAKUNTA ROAD,      GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA
    DISTRICT

                                                        ...PETITIONER

                                 AND

  1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, . REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
    SECRETARY - HOME,       SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI AT
    VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238

  2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
    DISTRICT-521001.

  3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM,
    KRISHNA DISTRICT-521101.

  4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANNAVARAM POLICE STATION,
    GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521101.

                                                    ...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

  1.B V ANJANEYULU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):
                                                2
                                                                                         Dr.YLR, J
                                                                              W.P.No.9854 of 2026
                                                                                 Dated 10.04.2026

     1.GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following:
ORDER:

The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India seeking the following relief:-

SPONSORED

“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or
direction, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not considering my
application seeking for permission for conducting peaceful march on
14.04.2026 in between 10.30 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. from SVR
Kalyanamandapam, Davaji Gudem to the Statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar i.e.,
Pedda Gandhi Bomma Center, Gannavaram on the occasion of the
birthday of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar though the petitioner made an application
through Mee-Seva dated 06.04.2026 vide application
No.PEB012600365809 as illegal, arbitrary and violation Art 14, 19 and 21
of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to
consider the application of the petitioner grant of peaceful march and pass
such order(s).”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Home.

3. Sri B.V. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the

writ petition is filed seeking permission from Respondent No. 3 to conduct a

peaceful march on 14.04.2026 between 10:30 A.M. and 2:00 P.M., from SVR

Kalyanamandapam, Davaji Gudem to the statue of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, i.e.,

Pedda Gandhi Bomma Center, Gannavaram, on the occasion of the birth

anniversary of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Constitution of

India.

4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home,

submits that Respondent No. 3 intends to grant appropriate permission to the
3
Dr.YLR, J
W.P.No.9854 of 2026
Dated 10.04.2026

Petitioner for conducting the peaceful march, subject to compliance with

certain conditions.

5. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing

Respondent No. 3 to grant necessary permission to the Petitioner for

conducting a peaceful march on the occasion of the birth anniversary of Dr.

B.R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner

shall scrupulously follow the conditions to be imposed by Respondent No. 3.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed.

_________________________
DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 10.04.2026
KMS
4
Dr.YLR, J
W.P.No.9854 of 2026
Dated 10.04.2026

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

Writ PETITION No.9854 of 2026

Date: 10.04.2026

KMS



Source link