Telangana High Court
V Hemavathi vs The State Of Telangana on 7 August, 2026
Author: B. Vijaysen Reddy
Bench: B. Vijaysen Reddy
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITON No.24042 OF 2026
DATE: 07-08-2026
Between:
Mrs. V. Hemavathi
... Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana
Rep. By its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others.
... Respondents
ORDER :
(ORAL)
Heard Mr. M. Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel for
Municipalities, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. Learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 placed
on record written instructions and submitted that respondent No.4
voluntary agreed to surrender portion of his property bearing
H.No.4-47, Wanaparthy Road, Pebbair Village and Mandal,
Wanaparthy District, which is being affected in the road widening
2
BVR,J
W.P. No.24042 of 2026
and requested the Municipality to demolish a part of his building
which is coming within eighty (80) feet wide road.
3. Learned standing counsel submitted that it was decided to
widen the road from Pebbair leading to Wanaparthy to 100′ feet for
public purpose by Municipal Council resolution No.602 dated
05.11.2022. However, at present width of the road has been
approved to widen to only eighty (80) feet. The property of
respondent No.4 which is being affected in the proposed road
widening will be demolished within one (1) week.
4. Recording the aforesaid submissions of learned standing
counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. This Court by order dated 24.07.2026 issued notice to
respondent No.4 and permitted the petitioner to take out personal
notice to respondent No.4. However, notice has not been served on
him. As this order is passed without going into the merits, notice to
respondent No.4 is dispensed with. If respondent No.4 is in any way
3
BVR,J
W.P. No.24042 of 2026
aggrieved by this order, he is at liberty to approach this Court
seeking modification of this order. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,
pending in the writ petition stand closed.
______________________
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J
August 07, 2026
Note: Issue CC today (BO) MS
