Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 19 March, 2026

    0
    42
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Patna High Court – Orders

    Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 19 March, 2026

    Author: Satyavrat Verma

    Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38088 of 2024
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2023 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad
                     ======================================================
               1.     Upendra Sharma @ Upendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Baijnath Sharma
                      Resident of Village and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S- Daudnagar , District-
                      Aurangabad
               2.    Ravi Ranjan Sharma @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Sharma @ Bablu Son of Sri
                     Chitlesh Sharma Resident of Village and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S-
                     Daudnagar , District-Aurangabad
               3.    Chitlesh Sharma @ Chitlesh Kumar Son of Late Baijnath Sharma Resident
                     of Village and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S- Daudnagar , District-Aurangabad
               4.     Rajeev Ranjan @ Raju Sharma Son of Chitlesh Sharma Resident of Village
                      and Post- Shamsher Nagar, P.S- Daudnagar , District-Aurangabad
                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                     The State of Bihar
                                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Roona, Advocate
                     For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                           ORAL ORDER
    
    3   19-03-2026

    1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

    A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of

    SPONSORED

    the informant.

    2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

    registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,

    149, 341, 323, 307, 354(B) and 386 of the Indian Penal Code as

    well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

    3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

    petitioners no. 1, 3 and 4 are persons with clean antecedent and

    petitioner no. 2 has antecedent of one case and the informant
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
    2/5

    alleges that on 28.04.2023 she had gone to see the levelling of

    the road near PACS godown carried out by the labourers without

    her husband when petitioners along with five unknown accused

    came variously armed and started abusing the labourers and the

    driver of the tractor. It is next alleged that the accused persons,

    from the date when the purchase of the land was made, were

    demanding ransom and were denying the passage. Since the

    petitioners were abusing the labourers and the driver of the

    tractor, as such, the informant informed her husband’s elder

    brother. It is further alleged that Ravi Ranjan torn the saree and

    the blouse of the informant thereafter Upendra Sharma and

    Manoranjan Sharma assaulted Nanku Pandey and Krishna

    Pandey by iron rod and Ravi Ranjan along with unknown

    accused made indiscriminate firing upon Nanku Pandey who

    was trying to flee.

    4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

    petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by

    the informant on account of dispute relating to land. It is further

    submitted that the date of occurrence is 28.04.2023 and the FIR

    came to be instituted on 08.05.2023 i.e. after a delay of more

    than ten days of the occurrence without any plausible

    explanation. It is next submitted that from the side of the
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
    3/5

    petitioners Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 249 of 2023 has been

    instituted against the informant and her side, as such, the instant

    FIR is a counterblast. It is also submitted that a dispute had

    arisen and from the side of the informant firing was resorted to

    which led to the death of the son of Upendra Sharma and even

    Upendra Sharma received firearm injury in his leg. It is further

    submitted that the police raided the house of the side of the

    informant and recovered arms. It is next submitted that in order

    to coerce the petitioners into submission so that they do not

    pursue with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023, the instant

    false case came to be instituted ten days after the occurrence

    based on a written application of the informant. It is, thus,

    submitted that if the instant FIR has been instituted based on the

    written application of the informant, the same could have been

    instituted promptly even but then was not done which also casts

    an aspersion on the allegation as alleged in the FIR when in the

    FIR instituted from the side of the petitioners, it is specifically

    alleged that side of the informant resorted to firing causing

    death of the son of Upendra Sharma on the spot.

    5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel

    appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer for

    anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
    4/5

    6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

    informant submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged

    in the FIR, it would manifest that Upendra Sharma, Manoranjan

    Sharma and others assualted Nanku Pandey and Krishna Pandey

    leading to grievous injury on which learned counsel appearing

    on behalf of the petitioners submits that what is not in disptue is

    that son of Upendra Sharma was killed by the side of the

    informant for which the aforesaid FIR was instituted. It is

    reiterated and submitted that even Upendra Sharma received

    firearm injury on his leg, as such, it does not appear probable

    that after receiving firearm injury Upendra Sharma would have

    resorted to assaulting the side of the informant. It is, thus,

    submitted that the said allegation has been alleged by way of

    afterthought only to coerce Upendra Sharma into submission so

    that he does not pursue with the killing of his son made by the

    side of the informant.

    7. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, let

    the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or

    surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released

    on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

    (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like

    amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where
    Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38088 of 2024(3) dt.19-03-2026
    5/5

    the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with

    Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023, subject to the conditions

    as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the

    B.N.S.S.

    (Satyavrat Verma, J)

    Kundan/-

    U     T
     

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here