Uttarakhand High Court
Unknown vs State Of Uttarakhand on 24 April, 2026
2026:UHC:3112
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
First Bail Application No. 2391 of 2025
24th April 2026
Jagsir Singh ...Applicant.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent.
Counsel for the applicant : Mr. Prem Kaushal and Mr.
Mahesh Chandra, counsel
Counsel for the State/ respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assistant
Government Advocate for the State of
Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT:
(per Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, J.)
Applicant Jagsir Singh, who is in judicial
custody in FIR No. 0031 of 2024, under Sections 419,
420, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120-B of IPC and 66-D of IT
Act, P.S. Cyber Crime, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh
Nagar has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. As per prosecution story, Shubhender Mondal
(complainant) lodged a FIR stating that the
complainant had been frauded of Rs.1,99,76,000/-(One
Crore Ninety-Nine Lakh and Seventy-Six Thousand
Rupees) by the unknown people, who had sent the
share trading link and in order to make profit in the
2
shares marketing, the complainant kept on investing
different amount.
4. That over the period of two months i.e.
11.06.2024 to 19.08.2024, the complainant sent
different amount of money to over 15 different bank
accounts on the instructions of the unknown people in
the name of investment in shares trading.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that out of the total frauded amount Rs.1,99,76,000/-
an amount of Rs.36,00,000/-(Rupees Thirty Six Lakh) is
alleged to have been transferred in the bank account of
company named Ultra Wings Nutrition Pvt. Ltd. and the
owner of the said company is co-accused Abhijeet
Singh.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant further
submits that the applicant was not named in the FIR but
he was arrested on the basis of the disclosure of the co-
accused Abhijeet Singh who had stated that on the
instructions of the applicant he had frauded the Aadhar
card and Pan card used in the commission of offence.
7. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that apart from the present case there were three other
FIRs registered against the applicant which are based
on same and identical facts though the complainants
3
are different. The multiple FIRs were registered against
the applicant at different places for the alleged used of
one bank account Ultra Wings Nutrition Pvt. Ltd.
8. The applicant was granted bail by three
different courts on the same set of allegations and the
applicant was arrested on 20.08.2024 and is
languishing in judicial custody since then.
9. At the time of the registration of the present
FIR on 24.10.2024, the applicant was in judicial custody
in Bhondsi Jail , Gurgram, Haryana in another FIR
No.170/2024 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime,
Gurgram. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that in the said case also the applicant was granted bail.
10. He submits that in the other two cases also
where similar set of allegations were levelled against
the applicant he was granted bail by different courts.He
refers to the bail order enclosed as Annexure-2 to 4 to
the bail application.
11. Thus in sum and substance, the contention of
the applicant is that he was not named in the FIR as
such he is entitled for bail and co-accused Abhijeet
Singh who was employee of the applicant is the
beneficiary in the bank account in which the money was
transferred and he was one who was instrumental in
4
using Pan card of the applicant’s deceased uncle. He
submits that applicant is neither the beneficiary nor has
received any amount in his account.
12. Per contra, learned counsel for the
respondent-State submits that the applicant along with
co-accused was instrumental in defrauding people of the
huge amount and the said fact was considered by the
learned First Additional Sessions Judge while rejecting
the bail of the applicant, however, he does not dispute
the fact that the applicant has been released on bail by
three different courts.
13. He is further not in a position to dispute the
findings recorded in the bail order dated 28.10.2024
passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram and
to the fact that no amount was credited into the account
of the applicant or he was the beneficiary of the amount
credited in the aforesaid account Ultra Wings Nutrition
Pvt. Ltd.
14. The applicant is in judicial custody since
20.08.2024 and the fact that he was not named in the
FIR and is not a beneficiary of the amount received
have also been considered by the different courts while
granting bail in the similar set of circumstances.
5
15. In view of the above, without commenting on
the merits of the case, the applicant is enlarged on
regular bail, subject to following conditions:
a) The applicant shall furnish a personal
bond of Rs.50,000/- with two reliable
sureties in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the Trial Court.
b) The applicant shall not leave the country
without prior permission of the Trial
Court.
c) The applicant shall regularly appear
before the Trial court.
d) The applicant shall not tamper with the
evidence, influence witnesses.
e) In case of violation of the above
conditions, the State may apply for
cancellation of bail.
16. The bail application stands disposed of
accordingly.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.)
24.04.2026
SS
Digitally signed by SUKHBANT SINGH
DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF
SUKHBANT SINGH
UTTARAKHAND,
2.5.4.20=71978f9c61bfde0ba69967c787b1764ea7bc7dd129a8a6380d49b1885
e628615, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND,
serialNumber=2D8B71B8D8E345F6B7F95B1DD4FB4BEBD2B7D72C42261361A
ED33172F152148D, cn=SUKHBANT SINGH
Date: 2026.04.27 10:31:22 +05’30’
