Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir Th vs Mahad Lone And Others on 10 March, 2026

    0
    39
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jammu & Kashmir High Court – Srinagar Bench

    Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir Th vs Mahad Lone And Others on 10 March, 2026

    Author: Rahul Bharti

    Bench: Rahul Bharti

                                                                             95
                                                                             Suppl-I
    
    
    
    
                   HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
                                   AT SRINAGAR
                                    CrlM(246/2026) in CrlA(AS) 7/2026
                                            CrlM(247/2026).
    
    
               Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Th
               Station House Officer, Police Station Kupwara.
                                                                   ...Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
                     Through:      Mr. Faheem Nisar Shah, Government Advocate.
    
                                                   VERSUS
    
               Mahad Lone And Others.
                                                                             ...Respondent(s)
                     Through:      None.
    
          CORAM:
                     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
                                             ORDER
    

    10.03.2026

    01. There is an inherent lacuna in very Government Order No. 487- JK (LD)

    SPONSORED

    of 2026 dated 16.01.2026 purportedly sanctioning the filing of a

    criminal acquittal appeal against judgment dated 01.08.2025 passed by

    the Court of Principal Sessions Judge, Kupwara.

    02. The Government Order refers to sanction for filing an appeal by

    reference to FIR No. 191/2005 of Police Station Kupwara for offences

    under section 379 IPC and section 6 of the Forest Act.

    03. The trial of accused persons before the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1 st

    Class, Kupwara had taken place by reference to charges under section

    379 RPC and section 6 of the Jammu and Kashmir Forest Act.

    04. Ranbir Penal Code and Indian Penal Code cannot be placed as

    interchangeable on the same page when it comes to the matter of coming

    up with the criminal conviction/acquittal appeal before this Court. The

    Government cannot expect the High Court Of Jammu and Kashmir and

    Ladakh as being the highest Court of appeal to switch over the
    expressions mentioned in Government order No. 487- JK (LD) of 2026

    dated 16.01.2026 by reference to Indian Penal Code (IPC) to be read as

    Ranbir Penal Code (RPC).

    05. As such, on the basis of the Government order in reference, the sanction

    is held not to be valid leaving it free for the Government to rectify its own

    mistake and then come up with the course correction in maintaining the

    acquittal appeal as is desired to be maintained against the order of

    acquittal in appeal passed by the Court of Principal Session Judge,

    Kupwara.

    06. Dismissed, as such.

    (RAHUL BHARTI)
    JUDGE

    SRINAGAR
    10.03.2026
    Bisma Jan.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here