U.Kalpana vs The State Of Andhra Pradesha on 15 July, 2026

    0
    9
    ADVERTISEMENT

    This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent

    No.3 in not considering the claim of Petitioner for promotion to the

    SPONSORED

    post of HWO Grade-I on account of „punishment of minor censure‟

    as illegal and arbitrary.

    2. Petitioner was initially appointed as HWO Grade-II on

    23.08.2006 and posted to Orvakal and she has been working at

    Orvakal from 14 years. While so, a charge memo vide Proceedings

    Rc.No.A1/123/2019-1, dated 20.08.2019 was issued. Petitioner

    submitted her explanation on 05.09.2019 denying all the charges.

    The Project Director, Mission for Elimination of Poverty in Municipal

    Areas, who was appointed as Enquiry Officer, after due enquiry,

    submitted a report dated 12.01.2022 holding that the charges as „not

    proved‟. Despite the report of the Enquiry Officer, vide impugned

    proceedings dated 13.08.2025 imposed a punishment of „censure‟.

    Now Petitioner is due for promotion to the post of HWO Grade-I. A

    final seniority list of Grade-II HWOs is communicated by Respondent

    No.3 on 28.09.2023 and the Petitioner was placed at Sl.No.14.

    Petitioner made a representation dated 05.07.2026 to Respondent

    No.4 to consider her candidature for promotion. Despite the same,

    one of her juniors Sri M.Vijay Babu at Sl.No.16 in the seniority list

    dated 28.09.2023 was considered for promotion and issued orders

    on 07.07.2026.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here