The Kur Syiemiong, Langrin vs . Khasi Hills Autonomous on 10 April, 2026

    0
    50
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Meghalaya High Court

    The Kur Syiemiong, Langrin vs . Khasi Hills Autonomous on 10 April, 2026

    Author: H. S. Thangkhiew

    Bench: H. S. Thangkhiew

     Serial No. 01
     Supplementary List-I
                            HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                  AT SHILLONG
    
    WP(C) No. 158 of 2026
                                                   Date of Order: 10.04.2026
    
    The Kur Syiemiong, Langrin       Vs.      Khasi Hills Autonomous
    Shiemship                                 District Council & Ors.
    
    Coram:
                 Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge
    
    
    Appearance:
    For the Petitioner(s)       :    Mr. S. Marpan, Adv.
    
    For the Respondent(s)       :    Ms. P.S. Nongbri, Adv. (For R 1-3)

    Mr. G.J. Nongphud, Adv. (For R 4)

    Heard Mr. S. Marpan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
    Issue notice.

    SPONSORED

    Ms. P.S. Nongbri, learned counsel is present and accepts notice on
    behalf of the respondents Nos. 1, 2 & 3, and Mr. G.J. Nongphud, learned
    counsel is present on behalf of the respondent No. 4, so no further notice
    is called for.

    This matter is connected to WP(C) No. 159 of 2026, wherein the
    notification dated 08.04.2026, is under challenge. The petitioner in the
    instant writ petition is stated to be the Kur Syiemiong of Langrin
    Syiemship.

    Page 1 of 2

    Mr. S. Marpan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
    removal of the Acting Syiem of Hima Langrin is in violation of Section-9
    of The Khasi Hills Autonomous District (Nomination and Election of
    the Syiem, Deputy Syiem and Headman of Langrin Syiemship) Act,
    2007, as there is no recommendation from the Syiem clan who are the
    petitioners herein for appointment of the respondent No. 4, as Acting
    Syiem, and as such the same being illegal, the impugned notification is
    liable to be set aside.

    Ms. P.S. Nongbri, learned counsel for the respondents Nos. 1, 2
    & 3 has reiterated the submissions made in the connected writ petition and
    submits that the recommendation has been received, however the same
    could not be placed on record. She prays that she may be allowed to come
    up with complete instructions on the next date.

    Accordingly, as the interim order is operating in the connected writ
    petition, list this matter on 17.04.2026.

    JUDGE

    Meghalaya
    10.04.2026
    “V. Lyndem-PS”

    Page 2 of 2



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here