Tehsil Hiranagar vs Jammu on 20 July, 2026

    0
    10
    ADVERTISEMENT

    01. Petitioner, facing trial, as one of the accused, in a case titled ‘NCB V.

    Sukhjinder Singh & Ors.’ before the Court of learned Principal

    SPONSORED

    Sessions Judge, Samba, arising out of NCR Crime No.4/2023 dated

    13.06.2023 under Sections 8/21/29/60 NDPS Act, 1985, has

    challenged the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the Trial Court,

    whereby charges have been framed against him under Sections

    8/21/29/60 NDPS Act.

    02. The impugned order has been assailed on various grounds that no

    contraband had been recovered from him and he was merely shown as

    an intended receiver under a conspiracy, regarding which, no proof

    was placed on record, as conspiracy and abetment require independent

    corroboration; that the case had been based against the accused

    squarely on the statements of co-accused recorded under Section 67 of

    NDPS Act, which in view of Toofan Singh judgment of the Apex

    court are inadmissible in evidence; that there was no independent and

    corroborative evidence to link the petitioner to the commission of the

    crime; that the CDR details placed on record were not of the details of

    the petitioner’s mobile phone; and finally it was prayed to quash the

    order impugned whereby the petitioner had been charge sheeted.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here