Patna High Court
Sureshwar Prasad Narayan Shahi @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 5 May, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68658 of 2021
Arising out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2013 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
======================================================
Sureshwar Prasad Narayan Shahi @ Sureshwar Narayan Prasad Shahi @
Sureshwar Narayan, Son of Late R.P. Narayan Shahi, Resident of Village -
Madhaul, P.S. - Saraiya, Distt.- Muzaffarpur- 843127.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Anr.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Senior Advocate
: Ms. Shambhavi Singh, Advocate
: Mr. Avinash Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 05-05-2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance
dated 22.01.2021 passed by learned Special Judge, PESU Area,
Patna in Special Case No. 704 of 2013 (Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.
260 of 2013) by which he has taken cognizance against the
petitioner for the offences u/s 135 of the Electricity Act.
3. The allegation in the FIR is that on 22.07.2013 at 2:00
P.M. a raid was conducted in the house of the petitioner situated at
Bakarganj, Patna. Fifteen meters of wire was seized. The
allegation is that the petitioner was illegally getting electricity
from a pole by fixing a hook of the wire. After institution of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68658 of 2021 dt.05-05-2026
2/3
FIR, the police submitted final form on the ground that the
distance of the house of the petitioner from the alleged pole was
100 meters and only 15 meters wire was seized. Moreover, the
petitioner had paid the part of the bill till September, 2013. The
learned Sessions Judge passed the order taking cognizance of
22.01.2021 without considering the aforesaid facts.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
that the investigation by the police is a statutory function and same
cannot be brushed aside lightly. He also submits that in case once
the police has submitted final form and the Magistrate has to differ
with final form then he must assign reasons otherwise the same
would amount to complete non-consideration of the police report
which is statutory responsibility of the police.
5. Perusal of the impugned order would show that no
reasons have been assigned for differing with the final form
submitted by the police.
6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State
has vehemently opposed the quashing of the order of cognizance
dated 22.01.2021.
7. In such view of the matter, the order of cognizance
dated 22.01.2021 passed by learned Special Judge, PESU Area,
Patna in Special Case No. 704 of 2013 (Kadamkuan P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68658 of 2021 dt.05-05-2026
3/3
260 of 2013) by which he has taken cognizance against the
petitioner for the offences u/s 135 of the Electricity Act is quashed
so far as the petitioner is concerned.
8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed.
(Ansul, J)
Vikash/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date Transmission Date
