State vs Ishrat Jahan@ Pinki on 24 April, 2026

Delhi High Court – Orders

State vs Ishrat Jahan@ Pinki on 24 April, 2026

Author: Navin Chawla

Bench: Navin Chawla

                  $~7
                  *         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                  +         CRL.A. 296/2022 & CRL.M.A. 12747/2022, CRL.M.A.
                            14462/2022
                            STATE                                      .....Appellant
                                           Through: Mr.SV Raju, ASG with
                                                    Mr.Dhruv Pande, Adv. along
                                                    with Insp Sandeep
                                           versus
                            ISHRAT JAHAN@ PINKI
                                                                    .....Respondent
                                           Through: None.

                            CORAM:
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
                                            ORDER

% 24.04.2026

1. This appeal has been filed challenging the order dated
14.03.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in I.A.
No. 93/2021, directing the respondent herein to be released on bail in
FIR No. 59/2020 dated 06.03.2020, originally registered under
Sections 147, 148, 149 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in
short, “IPC“) at Police Station Crime Branch, Delhi. Thereafter,
offences under Sections 109, 114, 124A, 153A, 186, 201, 212, 295,
302, 307, 341, 353, 395, 419, 420, 427, 435, 436, 452, 454, 468, 471
and 34 of the IPC; Sections 13, 16, 17 and 18 of the Unlawful
Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967; Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention
of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984; and Sections 25 and 27 of
the Arms Act, 1959, were added to the subject FIR.

SPONSORED

2. Since a considerable period of more than four years has passed
since the Impugned Order, and there is no allegation that the

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 22:05:36
respondent has in any manner violated the terms of the bail, we are not
inclined to interfere with the Impugned Order in the present appeal.

3. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. We make it clear that we
have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the appeal.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
APRIL 24, 2026/rv/Yg

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 22:05:36