Calcutta High Court
Srmb Srijan Private Limited vs Paltan Majumder on 6 April, 2026
Author: Arindam Mukherjee
Bench: Arindam Mukherjee
OIP -5,6 & 7
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DIVISION
ORIGINAL SIDE
IA NO.GA-COM/1/2025
IN
IP-COM/16/2025
SRMB SRIJAN PRIVATE LIMITED
VS
PALTAN MAJUMDER
IA NO.GA-COM/3/2025
IN
IP-COM/16/2025
SRMB SRIJAN PRIVATE LIMITED
VS
PALTAN MAJUMDER
IA NO.GA-COM/5/2025
IN
IP-COM/16/2025
SRMB SRIJAN PRIVATE LIMITED
VS
PALTAN MAJUMDER
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
Date: 6th April, 2026.
APPEARANCE:
Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Saptarshi Datta, Adv.
M. Biswaroop Mukherjee, Adv.
Ms. Srinjita Ghosh, Adv.,
Mr. Pourush Kanti Pal, Adv.
Mr. Debdut Hore, Adv.
For petitioner
Mr. Rudraman Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv.
2
Mr. Sourajit Dasgupta, Adv.
Mr. Bhavesh Garodia, Adv.
Mr. Subhankar Chakraborty, Adv.
Mr. Saptarshi Bhattacharjee, Adv.
Ms. Sayani Gupta, Adv.
For respondent
THE COURT: After hearing the parties, I find that there are three
applications pending in the suit.
The first in order of time is the plaintiff’s application for injunction
wherein by an order dated 15th January, 2026 the Co-ordinate Bench has
recorded the submission made on behalf of the respondent that save and
except the existing stock supplied by the plaintiff to the defendant being its
dealer, the defendant is not interested in selling any of the products of the
plaintiff. The dealership agreement has been terminated and, as such, there is
no question of any fresh supply of stocks. The second application in order of
time is the defendant’s application for disclosure of additional documents. The
third application is the defendant’s application under Sections 5 and 8 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Since the three applications are required to be heard either
simultaneously or analogously, the matters are adjourned and shall appear in
the monthly list of May 2026.
(ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
Sb/