Gauhati High Court
Sri Paritosh Baishnab And 2 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 7 July, 2026
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010140032026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : AB/1525/2026
SRI PARITOSH BAISHNAB AND 2 ORS.
SON OF ANIL BAISHNAB, RESIDENT OF ASHRAM ROAD, CHIBITABICHIA
PART IX, DISTRICT CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-788807.
2: SRI AASHU BAISHNAB ALIAS PIJUSH BAISHNAB
SON OF ANIL BAISHNAB
RESIDENT OF GUMRA BAZAR
KHELMA PART III
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-788815.
3: SRI RATHAN BAISHNAB ALIAS BAPPAN BAISHNAB
SON OF NIKHIL CHANDRA BAISHNAB
RESIDENT OF GUMRA BAZAR
KHELMA PART III
DISTRICT CACHAR
ASSAM
PIN-78881
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR KRISHNANGSHU B, MS JUTISMITA DAS
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
Date : 07.07.2026
Heard Ms. J. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. S. Lahkar,
learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
2. This application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the
petitioners namely, Paritosh Baishnab, Aashu Baishnab @ Pijush Baishnab, Rathan
Baishnab @ Bappan Baishnab, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with
Silchar P.S. Case No. 333/2026 under Section 296/117(2)/76/3(5) of BNS, 2023. The
list of accusation in this case is that on 28.03.2026 one Sujit Baishnab had lodged an
FIR before the Officer-in-Charge of Tarapur Town Outpost under Silchar Police Station
inter-alia alleging that the present petitioners who are named as accused in the FIR
have on 26.03.2026 at about 6:30AM assaulted the informant and his wife causing
injuries on their persons.
3. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioners as well as the
informant are tenants staying in common premises and there used to be occasional
altercations amongst them. She further submits that on the alleged on the same date
i.e., on 26.03.2026 also there were some altercations between them. However, the
accusation of the assault and causing injury made in the FIR has been exaggerated by
the informant. She submits that the petitioners are ready to cooperate with the
investigation. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor prays for
calling of the Case Diary.
4. Let the Case Diary be called for.
5. Let this matter be listed on 27.07.2026.
6. In the meantime, the petitioners are directed to appear before the Investigating
Officer of Silchar P.S. Case No. 333/2026 and co-operate in the investigation. If they
Page No.# 3/3
do so within the stipulated period of time, in the event of their arrest in connection
with the aforesaid case, they shall be allowed to go on interim bail of Rs. 30,000/-
each with one surety of the like amount subject to the following conditions:-
(i) That the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation; and
(ii) the petitioner shall not directly of indirectly make any inducement,
threat or promise to any person who may be acquainted with the facts of
the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts of the
case before the Investigating Officer.
7. Let this matter be listed accordingly.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
