Sports Authority Of India & Ors vs Bal Mukund & Ors on 30 July, 2026

    0
    10
    ADVERTISEMENT

    1. This writ petition assails order dated 17 December 2025 passed
    by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 1717/2021.

    SPONSORED

    2. There were five applicants in the OA, who are all respondents
    in the present writ petition. The respondents claim that they have been
    appointed on compassionate grounds as Multi-Tasking Staff2 in the
    office of the Sports Authority of India3, albeit on contract basis, as
    they were legal heirs of erstwhile employees of the SAI who died in

    1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter
    2 “MTS”, hereinafter
    3 “SAI”, hereinafter

    W.P.(C) 10649/2026

    KUMAR
    Signing Date:06.08.2026
    15:34:25
    harness and were in financial distress. They contended that the
    appointment had been made in accordance with the instructions on
    compassionate appointment issued by the Department of Personnel
    and Training4 on 16 January 2013, which permitted 5% of the
    vacancies in any Group C post to be filled up by way of
    compassionate appointment. It was in fact contended by the
    respondents before the Tribunal that there was no reason to appoint
    them on contract and that they ought to have been appointed regularly
    at the very inception but that, as they were in financial distress, they
    had no option but to accept the offer of appointment as was extended
    to them.



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here