Karnataka High Court
Smt Prathima vs Chennamma on 9 March, 2026
-1-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1968/2024 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. PRATHIMA
D/O SADASHIVA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
3-243-2, ANUGRAHA HOUSE
KUBALA GUDDE, HALEANGADY
Digitally signed MANGALURU - 574146, D.K.
by RUPA V
Location: HIGH ...APPELLANT
COURT OF
KARNATAKA (BY SRI. RODDA VEERSHETTY, ADV., FOR
SRI. PATGAR NARENDRA HANUMANT, ADV.,)
AND:
CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI (SINCE DEAD)
D/O BALE ALIAS PONNAPPA
R/AT. BHANDARA HOUSE
BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004.
1. GIRIJA ALIAS SUGUNA
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
D/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. NEAR THIMMAPPA COMPOUND
FALNIR, MANGALORE - 575 001.
2. VASANTHI
D/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI
-2-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
R/AT. BEHIND URVA MARKET
MANGALORE - 575 006.
3. SHOBA RAVI
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
D/O VASANTHI
R/AT. SAVITHRI NIVAS
OLD KENT ROAD
PANDESHWARA
MANGALORE - 575 001.
4. KAUSHIK
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O SHOBA RAVI
D/O VASANTHI
R/AT SAVTHRI NIVAS
OLD KENT ROAD, PANDESHWARA
MANGALORE - 575 001.
5. ABHISHEK
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O VASANTHI
R/AT SAVTHRI NIVAS
OLD KENT ROAD, PANDESHWARA
MANGALORE - 575 001.
6. NALINAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O VASANTHI
R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET
MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K.
7. SURESH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O VASANTHI
R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET
MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K.
8. SUCHETHA ALIAS SULOCHANA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
-3-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
D/O VASANTHI
R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET
MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K.
9. NAYANA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O VASANTHI
R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET
MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K.
10. MAMATHA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O VASANTHI
R/AT BEHIND URVA MARKET
MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K.
11. RAVINDRA
S/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
R/AT N.I.G. 21
HOUSING BOARD COLONY
KAVOOR, MANGALORE - 575 006, D.K.
12. SHILAMANI
D/O LATE CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE
BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004 D.K.
13. SOWMYA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O SHILAMANI
R/AT. BHANDARA HOUSE
BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
14. PRASHANTHA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O SHILAMANI
R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE,
BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
-4-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
15. DAYANANDA
S/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE
BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
16. GANGADHARA
D/O CHENNAMMA ALIAS PARVATHI
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/AT BHANDARA HOUSE
BEJAI, MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
17. SUNDARI
AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS
D/O BALE ALIAS PONNAPPA
R/AT MAROLI HITLU
MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
18. HASKER
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
S/O BALE ALIAS PONNAPPA
R/AT MAROLI HITLU
MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
19. DHARMARAJ
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT MAROLI HITLU
MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
20. SURESH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT MAROLI HITLU
MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
21. LTHA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
D/O SUNDARI
R/AT MAROLI HITLU
MANGALORE - 575 004, D.K.
-5-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
22. YASHAVANTHI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
D/O SUNDARI
R/AT ANANDA SUVARNA HOUSE
NEAR BHAGINI SAMAJA
JEPPU MANGALORE - 575 002.
23. RASMI
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
D/O YASHAVANTHI
R/AT ANANDA SUVARNA HOUSE
NEAR BHAGINI SAMAJA
JEPPU MANGALORE - 575 002.
24. RAKSH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
D/O YASHAVANTHI
R/AT ANANDA SUVARNA HOUSE
NEAR BHAGINI SAMAJA
JEPPU MANGALORE - 575 002.
25. SHAMBAVI
AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS
D/O LATE VENKAMMA
R/AT KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE - 575 005.
26. INDIRA
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
D/O LATE VENKAMMA
R/AT KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE - 575 005.
SHEKRA (SINCE DEAD)
S/O LATE VENKAMMA.
MANORAMA (SINCE DEAD)
D/O LATE VENKAMMA.
27. SOMANATH
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
-6-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O LATE PUTHAMMA
R/AT KANTHAPPA MAISTRY COMPOUND
MUNIYAL, KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DIST-574108.
28. THILOTHAMA
AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS
S/O LATE PUTHAMMA
R/AT KANTHAPPA MAISTRY COMPOUND
MUNIYAL, KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DIST-574108.
29. INDUMATHI ALIAS KUSUMAVATHY
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
D/O LATE PUTHAMMA
R/AT KANTHAPPA MAISTRY COMPOUND
MUNIYAL, KARKALA TALUK
UDUPI DIST-574108.
30. HARINA
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
D/O LATE SHANTHI
R/AT GEETHA MANDIRA
GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD
NEAR ALKE BRIDGE
KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002.
31. VINUTHA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
D/O HARINA
R/AT GEETHA MANDIR
GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD
NEAR ALKE BRIDGE
KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002.
32. JYOTHSNA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O HARINA
R/AT GEETHA MANDIR
GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD
-7-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
NEAR ALKE BRIDGE
KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002.
33. SHWETHA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
D/O HARINA
R/AT GEETHA MANDIR
GOKARNANATHA TEMPLE ROAD
NEAR ALKE BRIDGE
KUDROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002.
34. SUGANDHI
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
D/O POOVAMMA
R/AT MAROLI PADE
KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
35. MADHUSUDAN
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O SUGANDHI
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
36. RAJESH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O SUGANDHI
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
37. CHANDAPPA ALIAS CHANDRAPPA
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
S/O POVAMMA
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
38. NAGESH AMIN
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O POOVAMMA
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
-8-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
39. SHAGUNA ALIAS SAGUNA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
D/O POOVAMMA
R/AT XAVIER LUIS COMPOUND
KANDETTU, BIKARNAKATTE
MANGALORE - 575 005, D.K.
40. UDAYA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O SHAGUNA ALIAS SAGUNA
R/AT XAVIER LUIS COMPOUND
KANDETTU, BIKARNAKATTE
MANGALORE - 575 005, D.K.
41. VIJAYA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O SHAGUNA ALIAS SAGUNA
R/AT XAVIER LUIS COMPOUND
KANDETTU, BIKARNAKATTE
MANGALORE - 575 005, D.K.
42. SHAMBAVI
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
D/O SIRIAMMAK
R/AT C/O M THIMMAPPA
DRIVER K.E.B.
B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K.
43. DAYAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O SHAMBAVI
R/AT C/O M. THIMMAPPA
DRIVER K.E.B.
B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K.
44. SUNITHA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
D/O SHAMBAVI
R/AT C/O M. THIMMAPPA
DRIVER K.E.B.
B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K.
-9-
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
45. PRAMILA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
D/O SHAMBAVI
R/AT C/O M THIMMAPPA
DRIVER K.E.B.
B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K.
46. PRASHANTHA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
S/O SHAMBAVI
R/AT C/O M THIMMAPPA
DRIVER K.E.B.
B.C.ROAD, BANTWAL - 574219, D.K.
47. CHANDRAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
D/O POOVAMMA
R/AT NEAR N.A.V.P. SCHOOL
PILIKUNJA, KASARGOD
MANGALORE - 575008.
48. PURUSHOTHAMA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
D/O SIRIAMMK
R/AT YEYYADI, BORBAIL
MANGALORE - 575008, D.K.
49. YADAVA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O SIRIAMMK
R/AT MAROLI PADE
KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575008.
50. KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O SIRIAMMK
R/AT MAROLI PADE
KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575008.
- 10 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
51. RUKMINI
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
D/O SIRIAMMK
R/AT. C/O. MONAPPA POOJARY
PALLEMAJALU, P.O. MODANAUP
B.C. ROAD, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K.-574211.
52. RAVI
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O RUKMINI
R/AT. C/O. MONAPPA POOJARY
PALLEMAJALU, P.O. MODANAUP
B.C. ROAD, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K.-574211.
53. PREMA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
D/O SIRIAMMK
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
54. RATHNAKARA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O PREMA
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
55. CHANDRAHASA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O PREMA
R/AT MAROLI PADE, KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
56. RAMA BAI
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
D/O YAMUNA
R/AT. SHIVA BAGH
MERCARA HILL, MAROLI
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
- 11 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
57. PRAFULLA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
D/O RAMA BAI
R/AT. BEHIND 'G' RODI
KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
58. YASHODA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O RAMA BAI
R/AT. SHIVA BAGH, MERCARA HILL
MAROLI, MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
59. KISHANCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O PRAFULLA
R/AT. BEHIND 'G' RODI
KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
60. SWATHI
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O PRAFULLA
R/AT. BEHIND 'G' RODI
KANKANADY
MANGALORE - 575 002, D.K.
61. ANANDA
AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS
S/O MUNDYAPPA
R/AT. SHIVA BAGH, MERCARA HILL
MAROLI, MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
62. MUTHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS
D/O ACHAPPU
R/AT. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE
BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K.-574211.
- 12 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
63. SUNANDA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
D/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
64. PADMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
D/O SUNANDA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
65. JANAMMA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
66. MOHINI
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
D/O SUNANDA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
67. PADMANABHA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
- 13 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
68. HARISCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
69. ASHOKA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT. C/O. VENKAPPA POOJARY
MALLAR, PONNEDADI
ULAIBETTU POST
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
70. KUNHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE
BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
71. PADMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE
BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
72. GIRIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE
BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
73. KORAGAPPA ALIAS KOGGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
S/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT. C/O. AITHAPPA SAJIPA VILLAGE
- 14 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
BOLLAI POST, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
74. SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
D/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
75. MAMATHA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
D/O SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
76. PRAVINA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
77. SAVITHA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O SULOCHANA ALIAS SULOCHANI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
78. GANGAYYA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O MUTHAMMA
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
- 15 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
79. KRISHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS
D/O ACHAPPU
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
80. REVATHI
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
D/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
81. ROHINI
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
D/O REVATHI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
82. VASANTHA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O REVATHI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
83. JAYALAXMI
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O REVATHI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
- 16 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
84. ASHALATHA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
D/O REVATHI
R/AT C/O. SRIDHARA POOJARY
KEMPU GUDDE, AMTADY VILLAGE
POST KINNIBETU, BANTWAL TALUK
D.K. - 574211.
85. NALINI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
86. MAHABALA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O NALINI
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
87. LATHA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
D/O NALINI
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
88. GEETHA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
D/O NALINI
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
89. NEETHA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
D/O NALINI
- 17 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
90. ASHWITHA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
D/O NALINI
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
91. NAMITHA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O NALINI
R/AT C/O. RAMA POOJARY, IRAJE
VAIL JOUSE, KALIGE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
92. SUNANDA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY
KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
93. LOLAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
D/O SUNANDA
R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY
KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
94. MOHANDAS
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY
KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
95. SUDHAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
- 18 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
D/O SUNANDA
R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY
KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
96. MURALIDHARA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY
KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
97. CHIDANANDA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O SUNANDA
R/AT C/O. GIRIYAPPA POOJARY
KARMAR HOUSE, BALILA VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
98. JARAPPA ALILAS DARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. GANAPA POOJARY
GANADA KOTYA HOUSE
THUMBE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
99. PREMA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. NARAYANA POOJARY
DOOR NO.209, NEAR D.C. BUNGALOW
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
100. SHARMILA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O PREMA
R/AT. C/O. NARAYANA POOJARY
DOOR NO.209, NEAR D.C. BUNGALOW
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
- 19 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
101. SHRATH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O PREMA
R/AT. C/O. NARAYANA POOJARY
DOOR NO.209, NEAR D.C. BUNGALOW
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
102. BABY
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. DARANDA BAGILU HOUSE
HOSAGUDDE, POST THOKKOTTU
MANGALORE, D.K.-574211.
103. YATHIN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O BABY
R/AT. DARANDA BAGILU HOUSE
HOSAGUDDE, POST THOKKOTTU
MANGALORE, D.K.-574211.
104. PRAFULL
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. GANAPA POOJARY
GANADA KOTYA HOUSE
THUMBE VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.-574211.
105. NAGAMMA
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
D/O ACHAPPU
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
106. PADMANBHA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
- 20 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
BANTWAL TALUK,
D.K.574211.
107. CHANDRAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
108. SUNDARA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
109. MONAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
110. KOMALA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
111. UMESHA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
112. JANARDHANA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
S/O NAGAMMA
- 21 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
113. SHAMBYYA OBAYYA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
S/O NAGAMMA
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
114. HARISHA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAVATHI
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
115. GIRISH
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAVATHI
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
116. SURESHA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAVATHI
R/AT C/O. KANYAPPA POOJARY
BALEMANE, CHELURU VILLAGE
BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.574211.
117. RATHNA RAJ
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
D/O LATE RUKKU
R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
118. VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O RATHANA BAI
R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY
- 22 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
119. JAGANNATHA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
S/O RATHANA BAI
R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
120. SUMITHRA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O RATHANA BAI
R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE
PUMPWELL, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
121. NAINA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
D/O RATHANA BAI
R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
122. BHAVANI
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O RATHANA BAI
R/AT AMIN NIVAS, VIHAR COLONY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
123. RAKSHITA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
D/O SUMITHRA
R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE
PUMPWELL, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
124. DHANALAXMI
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O SUMITHRA
R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE
PUMPWELL, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
- 23 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
125. KOGGAPPA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
S/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT NEAR L.F. BRIDGE
PUMPWELL, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
126. SUMATHI ALIAS SULOCHANA
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
D/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT NEAR R.B. BUNGLOW
KANKANADY, MANGALORE
D.K.-575002.
127. ROSHAN PRASAD
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT DWARAKA HOUSE
V BLOCK, KRISHNAPUR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575014.
128. POORNIMA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
D/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT DWARAKA HOUSE
V BLOCK, KRISHNAPUR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575014.
129. NISHUMATHI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT DWARAKA HOUSE
V BLOCK, KRISHNAPUR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575014.
130. JANARDHANA
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
S/O LATE LAXMI
R/AT RAMA NAIK COMPOUND
MULIHITHLU, BOLAR
- 24 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
MANGALORE, D.K-575001.
131. PUSHPAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
D/O LEELAVATHI
R/AT C/O. K. POOVAPPA
D.NO.183 (ROOM NO.9)
POLICE QUARTERS
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
132. BHAGAVANADAS
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O PUSHPAVATHI
R/AT C/O. K. POOVAPPA
D.NO.183 (ROOM NO.9)
POLICE QUARTERS
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
133. GOPIDAS
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O PUSHPAVATHI
R/AT C/O. K. POOVAPPA
D.NO.183 (ROOM NO.9)
POLICE QUARTERS
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
134. PRASAD KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
S/O LATE LEELAVATHI
R/AT BALAGURI, KAVOOR
PADAVU, P.O. KAVOOR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575006.
135. AJITH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
S/O LATE LEELAVATHI
R/AT SENIOR ASSISTANT
C/O. C.P.C. COMPANY
POST VITTAL, D.K.-574243
- 25 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
B. MAHALAXMI (SINCE DEAD)
D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA.
136. SATHYENDRA
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
S/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT PUNJALKATTE
POST PUNJALKATTE
MANGALORE, D.K - 575004.
137. BHARATHENDRA
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
S/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT VAS COMPOUND
BIKARNKATTE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
138. RAVIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
S/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT PUNJALKATTE
POST PUNJALKATTE
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
139. HARINAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
D/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN
MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL
ASHOKANAGARA
MANGALORE, D.K. - 575004.
140. NRIPARAJA
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
S/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN
MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL
ASHOKANAGARA
MANGALORE, D.K. - 575004.
- 26 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
141. RAJESHWARI
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
S/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI
ASHOKANAGARA
MANGALORE, D.K. - 575004.
142. MANOHARI
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
D/O B. MAHALAXMI
R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
143. ROOPAREKHA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
D/O HARINAKSHI
R/AT. CLEARK CUM TYPIST
CORPORATION BANK
PANDESHWAR, MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
144. CHITRALEKHA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O HARINAKSHI
R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN
MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
145. MANOHARA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O HARINAKSHI
R/AT C/O. U.L. ANCHAN
MANU NEAR GOKUL HALL
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
146. SANTHOSH
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O RAJESHWARI
R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI
- 27 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
147. BHAGAWAN
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O RAJESHWARI
R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
148. SUCHITRA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
D/O RAJESHWARI
R/AT NEAR DEVIGUDI
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K. 575004.
RAMACHANDRA (SINCE DEAD)
S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA.
SUSHEELA (SINCE DEAD)
D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA.
149. SHANTHI
AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS
D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. B. BABU, MAROLI
KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE, D.K. 575004.
SATISH (SINCE DEAD)
S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA.
150. CHANDRAPRABHA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. VISHWANATHA
NEAR BANDIKOTYA
MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN
ULLAL, D.K.-575020.
- 28 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
151. ARUNAKARA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. B. BABU MAROLI
KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
152. SUDHAKARA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. B. BABU MAROLI
KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
153. BHAVANISHAKER
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE KRISHNAMMA
R/AT. C/O. B. BABU MAROLI
KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
154. SHOBHAMANI
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
D/O LATE KRISHNAMMA
R/AT C/O. B. BABU MAROLI
KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE, D.K-575005.
155. YOGITHA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
D/O CHANDRAPRABHA
R/AT C/O. VISHWANATHA
NEAR BANDIKOTYA
MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN
ULLAL, D.K. 575020.
156. PURUSHOTHAMA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAPRABHA
R/AT C/O. VISHWANATHA
NEAR BANDIKOTYA
MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN
ULLAL, D.K.-575020.
- 29 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
157. GIRISHA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O CHANDRAPRABHA
R/AT C/O. VISHWANATHA
NEAR BANDIKOTYA
MALLARAYA, DEVASTHAN
ULLAL, D.K.-575020.
158. SOWMYA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
D/O SHANTHI
R/AT C/O. B. BABU MAROLI
KAIKAMBA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
159. ROHINI
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
D/O LATE GNGAMMA
R/AT NEAR MAROLLI
KAIKAMBA, BIKARNAKATTE
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
160. ANITHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O ROHINI
R/AT NEAR MAROLLI, KAIKAMBA
BIKARNAKATTE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
161. CHITTARANJAN
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O ROHINI
R/AT NEAR MAROLLI, KAIKAMBA
BIKARNAKATTE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE, D.K.- 575004.
162. PRABHAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
D/O LATE BHAVANI
- 30 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT LINGAPPA COMPOUND
GANAPATHY TEMPLE ROAD
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
163. YAMUNA
AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS
D/O LATE DASAMMA
R/AT NEAR MAROLLI, KAIKAMBA
BIKARNAKATTE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
164. PADMANABHA
AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENDRAMMA
R/AT C/O. SUMATHI ANCHAN
DEVIKRIPA NEAR PRABHA BHAVAN
SOMESHWAR, UCHIL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575023.
165. SUNDRI
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
D/O LATE CHENDRAMMA
R/AT A SHEENA, ALAPE
PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.575007.
166. SEETHA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
D/O LATE SHARADA
R/AT. KAVOOR POST
KAVOOR VILLAGE
MANGALORE, D.K.575006.
167. REVATHI
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
D/O LATE SHARADA
R/AT C/O. VISHVANTH
KANTHAPPA COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
- 31 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
168. JANAKI
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
D/O LATE SHARADA
R/AT C/O. VISHVANTH
KANTHAPPA COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
169. SUMATHI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
D/O LATE SHARADA
R/AT C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
170. MOHINI
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
D/O LATE SHARADA
R/AT C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
171. GANESHA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O SUNDRI
R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE
PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007.
172. DINESHA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O SUNDRI
R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE
PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007.
173. JAGADISH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O SUNDRI
R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE
PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007.
- 32 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
174. MALATHI
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O SUNDRI
R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE
PADIL, MANGALORE
D.K.-575007.
175. DAYAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O SUNDRI
R/AT. C/O. A. SHEENA, ALAPE
PADIL, MANGALORE, D.K.-575007.
176. JAYASHREE
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O SEETHA
R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST
KAVOOR VILLAGE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575006.
177. SHAILAJA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
D/O SEETHA
R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST
KAVOOR VILLAGE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575006.
178. SARITHA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
D/O SEETHA
R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST
KAVOOR VILLAGE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575006.
179. YATHISHA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
D/O SEETHA
R/AT. NEAR KAVOOR POST
KAVOOR VILLAGE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575006.
- 33 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
180. DHARESHA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
S/O SUMATHI
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
181. NARESH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O SUMATHI
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
182. LATHIS
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
S/O SUMATHI
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
183. PRAVEEN
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O JANAKI
R/AT. C/O. VISHVANTH
KANTHAPPA COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
184. PRAJNA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/AT. C/O. VISHVANTH
KANTHAPPA COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
- 34 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
185. LOHITHA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
S/O SUMATHI
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
NAGAMMA (SINCE DEAD )
D/O LATE KOCHU.
186. ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
AGED ABOUT 113 YEARS
S/O LATE KOCHU
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
187. SUBRAYA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 111 YEARS
S/O LATE KOCHU
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
188. GANGA
AGED ABOUT 103 YEARS
S/O LATE KOCHU
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
189. SUNDARI
AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS
S/O LATE KOCHU
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
- 35 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
190. KRISHNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS
D/O LATE KOCHU
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
191. PARVATHY
AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS
D/O LATE NAGAMMA
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
SARASWATHY
SINCE DEAD.
192. LEELA
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
D/O LATE NAGAMMA
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
193. JAYANTHI
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
D/O LATE NAGAMMA
R/AT. C/O. BHUJANGA
MARKADE HOUSE, KRISHNANAGAR
BONDEL POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
194. TARAVATHY
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
S/O LATE BHAVANI
R/AT. MARY HILL, KONCHADY POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
- 36 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
195. HEMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
D/O GANGA
R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY
KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
196. KORAGAPPA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O GANGA
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
197. KESHAVA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O GANGA
R/AT. C/O. RAMA, KIRODIAN
ASHOKANAGAR
MANGALORE, D.K.-575006.
198. SURENDRA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCONUT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
199. NAGESH AMIN
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT
GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.575002.
200. ROHITHASHWA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT
- 37 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.575002.
201. RAMADAS AMIN
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT
GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.575002.
202. UMESHA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O SUNDARI
R/AT. NEAR GOVT COCONUT
GARDEN, KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.575002.
203. LEELADHARA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
S/O PARVATHY
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.575003.
204. MANOJ
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O PARVATHY
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.575003.
205. YASHAVANTHI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O PARVATHY
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.575003.
206. NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHY
- 38 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
207. DEVARAJA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
208. SUSHEELA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
D/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
209. MANOHARA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
210. VASANTHA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
D/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
211. SARALA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
D/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. SHIVANANDA PANDIT SWAMY
- 39 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
PRASD HOUSE, THALAPADY
KINIGOLI, UDUPI-574150.
212. SURESH
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
213. HARISCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHY
R/AT. C/O. CHANDAYYA POOJARY
BOLEPUGUDDE HOUSE
KAVOOR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575004.
214. KRISHNAVENI
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
D/O LEELA
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
215. YADAVA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O LEELA
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
216. VINODA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O LEELA
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
- 40 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
217. SHIVANANDA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O LEELA
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
DEVADAS
SINCE DEAD
S/O TARAVATHY
218. SUREKHA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O TARAVATHY
R/AT. NEAR V.S.S.S. SANGHA
BANTWALA, D.K.-575211.
219. HARISHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O TARAVATHY
R/AT. MARY HILL
KONCHADY POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
220. LATHA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O TARAVATHY
R/AT. MARY HILL
KONCHADY POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
221. ASHA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
D/O TARAVATHY
R/AT. MARY HILL
KONCHADY POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
222. RENUKA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O HEMAVATHI
R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY
- 41 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
223. YASHAVANTHA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O HEMAVATHI
R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY
KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
224. JAYASHREE
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
D/O HEMAVATHI
R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY
KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
225. HARISHA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
S/O HEMAVATHI
R/AT. KARIYAPPA POOJARY
KOTI POOJARY COMPOUND
KULASHEKAR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
226. UMESHA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY
BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE
DANDEKARI, KONCHADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
227. KAMALAKSHA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY
BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE
- 42 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
DANDEKARI, KONCHADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
228. SADANANDA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY
BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE
DANDEKARI, KONCHADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
229. SUMAN
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY
BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE
DANDEKARI, KONCHADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
230. MOHAN
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. RAMA MAISTRY
BOLAPAGUTHU HOUSE
DANDEKARI, KONCHADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
231. LOHITH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O SARALA
R/AT. SHIVANANDA PANDI SWAMY
PRASD HOUSE, THALAPADY
KINIGOLI, UDUPI-574150.
232. SHARATH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O KRISHNAVENI
R/AT. NEAR SRI OIL MILLS
BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
- 43 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
233. NITHIN
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O SUREKHA
R/AT. NEAR V.S.S. SANGHA
BANTAWAL, D.K.-575211.
234. LOLAMMA
AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS
D/O POOVAPPA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
SUNDARI
SINCE DEAD
D/O LATE POOVAPPA.
235. PUTHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
D/O POOVAPPA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
236. JAYANTHA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
S/O LATE POOVAPPA
R/AT. SAI NILAYA
OPPOSITE BEJAI CHURCH
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
237. DEVAKE
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
D/O POOVAPPA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
- 44 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
238. LEELA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
D/O POOVAPPA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
239. RAMA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
D/O POOVAPPA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
240. JALAJAKSH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O PUTHAMMA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
241. HARIDASA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE MUTHU
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
242. MEENAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O LATE MUTHU
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
- 45 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
243. PURUSHOTHAMMA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
D/O LATE MUTHU
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
244. KEIAHNA VENI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O LATE MUTHU
R/AT. MAROLI DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
245. VIJAYA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O LATE MUTHU
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
246. DURGADAS
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O LATE MUTHU
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
247. SHEKARA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O PUTHAMMA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
248. KESHAVA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
- 46 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O PUTHAMMA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
249. JAYANTHI
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O PUTHAMMA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
250. PREMNATH
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O DEVAKE
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
251. RAMESH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
S/O DEVAKE
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
252. MAHALAXMI
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O DEVAKE
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
253. TRIVENI
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
D/O DEVAKE
- 47 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
254. DIVAKARA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
S/O DEVAKE
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
NALINAKSHI
SINCE DEAD
D/O DEVAKE.
255. SHEELAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
D/O DEVAKE
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
256. BALAKRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O DEVAKE
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
257. PRASHANTH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O LEELA
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
- 48 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
258. CHETAN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
S/O MEENAKSHI
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
259. MITHUN KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O MEENAKSHI
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
260. PADMASHREE
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
D/O MEENAKSHI
R/AT. DEVIKRIPA
PACHANADY VILLAGE
BONDEL POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575008.
261. SHARATH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O KEIAHNAVENI
R/AT. MAROLI DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
262. ANANDA
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
S/O KANAPAYA
R/AT. C/O. GEEHA BHAVAN
YEYYADI PADAV, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
263. SANJEEVA
AGED ABOUT 95 YEARS
S/O MANYAPPE ALIAS MANJAPPE
- 49 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. NEAR JEPPINAMOGARU SCHOOL
POST KANKANADY, MANGALORE
D.K.-575008.
264. KUMUDA
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
W/O SURENDRA AMIN
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCONUT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002
265. AKSHATHA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O SURENDRA AMIN
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
266. NEVEDITHA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
D/O SURENDRA AMIN
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
267. SHARATH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O SURENDRA AMIN
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
268. CHANDRAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
W/O ROHITHASHWA
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
269. PRETHISH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
- 50 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O ROHITHASHWA
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
270. PRIYA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O ROHITHASHWA
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
271. PRITHIKA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S/O ROHITHASHWA
R/AT. NEAR GOVT., COCOUNT
GARDEN KADRI, KANKANADY
MANGALORE, D.K.-575002.
272. JAYANTHI BELOOR
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
D/O NAGAMMA
R/AT. BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
273. PARVATHI
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O JAYANTHI
R/AT. BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
274. LEELA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O JAYANTHI
R/AT. BOLOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575003.
275. GIRIJA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
W/O KORAGAPPA AMIN
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
- 51 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
276. MANJULA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O GIRIJA
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
277. JAYAPRABHA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O GIRIJA
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
278. USHA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
W/O KESHAVA
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
279. SOWMYA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O KESHAVA
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
280. SAPNA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
D/O KESHAVA
R/AT. KONGOOR HOUSE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
281. GAYATHRI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
W/O DEVADAS
- 52 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. KANOOR, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
282. LAXMI
AGED ABOUT 99 YEARS
W/O SUNDARA
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
283. NAGESH ANCHAN
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
S/O SUNDARA
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
284. LALITHA
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
D/O SUNDARA
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
285. LAXMANA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O SUNDARA
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
286. ANANDA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O SUNDARA
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
287. CHANDRASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O SUNDARA
- 53 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
288. NAVEENCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O SUNDARA
R/AT. MAROLI, DODDAMANE
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
289. T. GIRIJA
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS
W/O LATE SHEKARA
R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
290. SANTHOSH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O LATE SHEKARA
R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
291. M. SHIVAPRASAD
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O LATE SHEKARA
R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
292. M. PUSHPA RAJ
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
S/O LATE SHEKARA
R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
293. SHARNYA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
- 54 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
D/O LATE SHEKARA
R/AT. KATTADAKODI HOUSE
MAROLI, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
294. YAMUNA
AGED ABOUT 111 YEARS
W/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
295. PREMALATHA
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
296. VEDAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
297. UMANATH
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS
S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
298. CHANDRAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS
S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
- 55 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
299. JAYAVEERA
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
300. SATHISHA
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
301. SHAMALA
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
302. NARENDRA
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
303. POORNIMA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
304. DINESHA
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
S/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
- 56 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
305. VISHALAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
D/O ACHUTHA AMIN ALIAS ACHU
R/AT. JAYASHREE GATE
BIKARNKATTA, MANGALORE
D.K.-575005.
306. CHANDRAKANTHA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
307. NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
308. DEVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
309. SUSHEELA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
D/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
310. MANOHR
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
311. VASANTHA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
D/O LATE SARASWATHI
- 57 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
312. SARALA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
D/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
313. SURESHA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
314. HARISCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O LATE SARASWATHI
R/AT. BALEPU GUDDE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575015.
315. SACHINDRA
AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS
S/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
316. BARATENDRA
AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS
S/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
317. RAVIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
S/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
318. HARINAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
- 58 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
319. NRAPARAJ
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS
S/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
320. RAJESHWARI
AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS
D/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
321. MANOHARI
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
D/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
322. VASUKUMARI
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
D/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. PUNJALKATTE POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-574233.
323. JAIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. KAIKAMBA
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
324. JEEVARATHANA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. KAIKAMBA
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
- 59 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
325. SUNDARI BAI
AGED ABOUT 108 YEARS
W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA
R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA
OLD KEN ROAD
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
326. SHASHIKANTH
AGED ABOUT 105 YEARS
S/O LATE SAVITHRI
R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA
OLD KEN ROAD
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
327. CHANDRAKALA
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA
R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA
OLD KEN ROAD
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
328. NAVEEN
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA
R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA
OLD KEN ROAD
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
329. PRADEEP
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA
R/AT. SAVITHRI NILAYA
OLD KEN ROAD
MANGALORE, D.K.-575001.
330. ROHINI
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
W/O LATE SATISH
R/AT. MAROLIKAIKAMBA
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
- 60 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
331. PRAJVITHA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S/O LATE SATISH
R/AT. MAROLIKAIKAMBA
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
332. AKSHTHA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O LATE SATISH
R/AT. MAROLIKAIKAMBA
KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE, D.K.-575005.
333. BHUJANGA
AGED ABOUT 101 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
334. GIRIJA
AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS
D/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
335. K. PADMANABHA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
336. VASANTHI
AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS
D/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
- 61 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
337. AMRUTHA
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
D/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
338. ASHOKA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. BHANDARA MANE, BEJAI
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
339. SUCHARITHA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
D/O LATE MANORAMA
R/AT MAROLI
DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE 575005.
340. ROSHAN
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O LATE MANORAMA
R/AT MAROLI
DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE 575005.
341. THARESH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE MANORAMA
R/AT MAROLI
DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE 575005.
342. VISHALA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
D/O LATE MANORAMA
R/AT MAROLI
- 62 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
DODDAMANE, KULASHEKAR POST
MANGALORE 575005.
343. SHEKARA
AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT. MONAPPA COMPOUND
MARNAMIKATTE
MANGALORE, D.K.-575004.
344. BHJANGA ALIAS SUNDARA
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT MUNDA COLONY
BLOCK NO 10, ROOM NO 6
POWY SQUARE, BOMBAY 400082.
345. RAMACHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT NO 355, 10TH CROSS
III STAGE, GOKULAM
MYSORE 570002.
346. PURUSHOTHAMA
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT SUPERVISOR, SOETS LTD.,
THANE, MAHARASHTRA-400066.
347. GOPALAKRISHNA
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT MANAGER VIJAYA BANK
NAGAPPA BLOCK
BANGALORE 560021.
- 63 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
348. AMRITH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT C/O GOVT., TOOL ROOM
AND TRAINING CENTRE
RAJAJI NAGAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE
BANGALORE-560044.
349. ASHOK KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
S/O LATE CHENNAMMA
ALIAS PARVATHI
R/AT 15A, GANESH LEELA
NEAR BHARGAVI TEMPLE
KELWA WEST, BOMBAY 400088.
350. YASHODA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
D/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA
BHARATHINAGAR
DHARWAD 580004.
351. SOMASUNDARA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
D/O LATE SEETHAMMA
R/AT. PRASHANTH KUTEERA
BHARATHINAGAR
DHARWAD 580004.
352. PRASHANTH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
D/O YASHODA
R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA
BHARATHINAGAR
DHARWAD 580004.
353. PAVITHRA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O YASHODA
- 64 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA
BHARATHINAGAR
DHARWAD 580004.
354. THRIVENI
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O YASHODA
R/AT PRASHANTH KUTEERA
BHARATHINAGAR
DHARWAD 580004.
355. VASANTHA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O INDIRA
R/AT C9-2, NITHIN BUILDING
GEETHANJALI NAGAR
S.V. ROAD, BORIVILE WEST
BOMBAY 400071.
356. SUCHARITHA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O MANORAMA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
357. ABHIJITH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
S/O SUCHARITHA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
358. NIHAL
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O SUCHARITHA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
- 65 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
359. TARESH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
S/O MANORAMA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
360. ROHAN
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
S/O MANORAMA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
361. VISHALA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O MANORAMA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
362. NONIP
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O VISHALA
R/AT J-543, 6TH FLOOR
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY 400071.
363. DIVAKARA
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
S/O LATE VENKAMMA
R/AT. #11, B.A.R.C. QUARTERS
BYCULLA, BOMBAY-400008.
364. JANARDHAN
AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS
D/O LATE PUTHAMMA
R/AT 7-2-2, TATA HOUSING
CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058.
- 66 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
365. ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS
D/O LATE PUTHAMMA
R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING
CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058.
366. PRATAP
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI
R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING
CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058.
367. PRASHANTH ALIAS PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI
R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING
CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058.
368. MALLIKA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI
R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING
CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058.
369. CHANDRAKANTHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O ROHINI ALIAS MOHINI
R/AT G-2, TATA HOUSING
CENTRE, LULLUBHAI PARK ROAD
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY 400058.
370. HEMALATHA KOTIAN
AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS
D/O LATE SHANTHI
R/AT 14-473, SUTASH NAGAR
CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071.
- 67 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
371. VEDAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
D/O LATE SHANTHI
R/AT ROOM NO.158,
JORHABAGA, ASSLFA
PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER
BOMBAY 400084.
372. VIDYULLATHA
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
D/O LATE SHANTHI
R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL SQUATRS
COLONY ROAD, MEGHWADI
JOGEHSWARI EAST, BOMBAY 400060.
373. DEVARAJ AMIN
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
S/O LATE SHANTHI
R/AT ROOM NO.2, AMARCHAND
CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY
OPP. MAHALAXMI COLONY
CEASERS ROAD, AMBOLI VILLAGE
ANDERI WEST, BOMBAY-400058.
374. PARAMESHA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN
R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR
CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071.
375. NANDISH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN
R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR
CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071.
376. JESHWANTHI ALIAS YASHAVANTHI
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN
R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR
CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071.
- 68 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
377. KUNAL
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O HEMALATHA KOTIAN
R/AT 14-473, SUTHASH NAGAR
CHEMBER, BOMBAY 400071.
378. MAHESH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O VEDAVATHI
R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGH
ASSLFA, PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER
BOMBAY-400084.
379. SHAILAJA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O VEDAVATHI
R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGH
ASSLFA, PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER
BOMBAY-400084.
380. NIRANJAN
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S/O VEDAVATHI
R/AT ROOM NO.158, JORHABAGH
ASSLFA, PIPE LINE, GHATKOPPER
BOMBAY-400084.
381. CHANDANI
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O VIDYULLATHA
R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL
SQUATRS, COLONY ROAD
MEGHWADI, JOGESHWARI EAST
BOMBAY-400060.
382. LAVANYA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
D/O VIDYULLATHA
R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL
SQUATRS, COLONY ROAD
- 69 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
MEGHWADI, JOGESHWARI EAST
BOMBAY-400060.
383. BHARATH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O VIDYULLATHA
R/AT. PRAMILA, PATEL CHAL
SQUATRS, COLONY ROAD
MEGHWADI, JOGESHWARI EAST
BOMBAY-400060.
384. YOGENDRA
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS
S/O YAMUNA
R/AT NO.585, 'A' TYPE
K.G.F. KOLAR-563113.
385. SHIVAPPA
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
S/O LATE JANAMMA
OCC:CARPENTER
R/AT. DOOR NO.137-2
MALANDEVAPET, COORG
MADIKERI-400060.
386. SHODANPRASAD
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O SUMATHI
R/AT C/O. GARDIAN, ROYAL
EXCHANGE INSURANCE
P.B.NO.5899, RUVI
MUSCANT-SULTANATE OF OMAN.
387. VENKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 100 YEARS
S/O LATE LAXMI
R/AT. BORICHAL HOUSE BAIWADI
VOKALA CHURCH (SOUTH)
BOMBAY-400060.
388. SOWMINI
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
- 70 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
D/O LATE LEELAVATHI
R/AT. DOOR NO.175
OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL
B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201.
389. GUNAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
D/O LATE LEELAVATHI
R/AT. DOOR NO.175
OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL
B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201.
390. ASHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O SOWMINI
R/AT. DOOR NO.175
OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL
B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201.
391. PRAVEN RAJ
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O SOWMINI
R/AT. DOOR NO.175
OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL
B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201.
392. VARADARAJ
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O SOWMINI
R/AT. DOOR NO.175
OPP. VAKKALIGA HOSTEL
B.M. ROAD, HASSAN-573201.
393. VASUKUMARI
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
D/O MAHALAXMI
R/AT. C/O. BHASKAR SANIL
DOOR NO.55(2), NEW HOUSE
NMC 5TH CROSS, OLD TOWN LEFT
BADRAVATHI-577303.
- 71 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
394. RENUKA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
D/O VASUKUMARI
R/AT. C/O. BHASKAR SANIL
DOOR NO.55(2), NEW HOUSE
NMC 5TH CROSS, OLD TOWN LEFT
BADRAVATHI-577303.
395. G.V. JAIRAJ
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. C/O. MAJOR, J.G. BALA
T-179-1, SHAHIBAG OFFICERS
ENCLAVE NEAR SHAHIBAG TALL NAKA
AHMEDBAD-380008.
396. JEEVARATHAN
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O SUSHEELA
R/AT. C/O. SYNDICATE BANK, JAL PALACE
T-179-1, SHAHIBAG OFFICERS
ENCLAVE NEAR SHAHIBAG TALL NAKA
AHMEDBAD-380008.
397. SAROJINI
AGED ABOUT 96 YEARS
D/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT. SHANTHI BUILDING
FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR
CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089.
398. SUMATHI
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
D/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD
DOMBIWILL WEST, THANE-421202.
399. SABITHA
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
D/O LATE RAMANI
- 72 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6
DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES
GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086.
400. HARINAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS
D/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT 8/225, SHASHTRI NAGAR
GOREGON WEST, BOMBAY-400062.
401. JAYANTHA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
D/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT. ARUNODAYA, FLAT NO.5
ODHAR NAGAR, BORIVILI (EAST)
BOMBAY-400066.
402. RAVIKALA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
D/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT FLAT NO.5, 2ND FLOOR
DARSHAN PARLE (C), KALYANINAGAR
YARWADA, POONA-411014.
403. MOHAN
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT SHANTHI BUILDING
FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR
CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089.
404. SATHISH
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT SHANTHI BUILDING
FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR
CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089.
405. ARAVINDA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMANI
- 73 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT SHANTHI BUILDING
FLAT NO.15, CHEDDA NAGAR
CHEMBUR, BOMBAY-400089.
406. ANUSHA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
D/O SHOBITHA
R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6
DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES
GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086.
407. BABY
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
D/O ANUSHA
R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6
DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES
GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086.
408. SUSHMA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
D/O SHOBITHA
R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6
DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES
GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086.
409. KEERTHI
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
D/O SHOBITHA
R/AT C/O. JAYANTHA & CO-6
DHANALAXMI REFLE RANGES
GHATKOPER, BOMBAY-400086.
410. LAVANYA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
D/O SUMATHI
R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD
DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202.
411. MARIDULA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
- 74 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O SUMATHI
R/AT 1/9TH , JUHU, VISAL
J.V.P.D., SCHEME, 5TH FLOOR
JUHU, BOMBAY-400049.
412. ANIL
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
S/O MARIDULA
R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD
DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202.
413. SUNIL
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
S/O MARIDULA
R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD
DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202.
414. PUNITH
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
S/O LAVANYA
R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD
DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202.
415. PRIYA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
S/O LAVANYA
R/AT. ASHWINI NIVAS, 1ST FLOOR
BLOCK NO.3, M-PHULA ROAD
DOMBIWILL-WEST, THANE-421202.
416. PRABHAKARA
AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMANI
R/AT A-20, ROOPE-POOJA CO-OP
HOUSING SOCIETY, 5TH FLOOR
BEHIND ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL
NAHUR, MULAND, BOMBAY-400080.
- 75 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
417. NEVADITA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O HARINAKSHI
R/AT 8/255, SHASHTRI NAGAR
GOREGON WEST
BOMBAY-400062.
418. ARCHANA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
D/O HARINAKSHI
R/AT 8/255, SHASHTRI NAGAR
GOREGON WEST
BOMBAY-400062.
419. THARUN
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
S/O RAVIKALA
R/AT. FLAT NO.5, II FLLOR
DARSHAN PARLE (C)
KALYANINAGAR, YARWADA
POONA-411014.
420. NIHIL
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O RAVIKALA
R/AT FLAT NO.5, II FLOOR
DARSHAN PARLE (C), KALYANINAGAR
YARWADA, POONA-411014.
421. NAGESH
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS
S/O GANGAMMA
R/AT. 106/8, DEFENCE CIVIL QUARTERS
KELINA, VIDYANAGAR
BOMBAY-400098.
422. VASANTHA
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
S/O GANGAMMA
R/AT 142/4250, KANNAMVARANAGAR
VIKROLI, BOMBAY-400083.
- 76 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
423. GEETHA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O ROHINI
R/AT NO.504, VRINDAVAN 2A
QUARRY ROAD, RAHIJA TOWNSHIP
MALAD (EAST), BOMBAY-400097.
424. RAJITHA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
D/O ROHINI
R/AT. C/O. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE
CORPORATION LTD., DHANRAJ MAHAL
CHATRAPATHI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ
MARG, BOMBAY-400039.
425. NAMITHA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
D/O ROHINI
R/AT #16 NAND SUKHSHANTHI M-FULE
ROAD, BOMBIVIL (WEST)
THANA-421202.
426. POORNIMA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O ROHINI
R/AT. C/O. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE
CORPORATION LTD., DHANRAJ MAHAL
CHATRAPATHI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ
MARG, BOMBAY-400039.
427. YATHIS
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
D/O ROHINI
R/AT NO.504, VRINDAVAN 2A
QUARRY ROAD RAHIJA TOWNSHIP
MALAD (EAST), BOMBAY-400097.
428. NATHASHA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
D/O RAJITHA
- 77 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. C/O. AGRICULTURAL FINANCE
CORPORATION LTD., DHANRAJ MAHAL
CHATRAPATHI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ
MARG, BOMBAY-400039.
429. AKSHAYA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
S/O NAMITHA
R/AT #16, NAND SUKHSHANTHI
M-FUEL ROAD, BOMBIVIL (WEST)
THANA - 421202.
430. SUNDARA
AGED ABOUT 106 YEARS
S/O BAGI
R/AT. B-9, FLAT NO.6, MEERA NAGAR
KORAGON PARK, POONA-411004.
431. K.V. AMIN ALIAS VISHWANTH
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS
S/O LATE BHAVANI
R/AT 35-1029, PANT NAGAR
GHATKOPR, BOMBAY-400025.
432. RAGHAVA AMIN
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
S/O LATE BHAVANI
R/AT C/O. P.B. NO.10263
EXPRESS PRINTING PRESS, SERVICE
DUBAI UNITED ARAB EMIRATES.
433. VASANTH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
D/O SUNDARI
R/AT. DOOR NO.401, 'B' SECTOR
II KUDUREMUKH-577142.
434. SUHASINI S. ANCHAN
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
D/O SUNDARI
R/AT 1-16, DIVISION NO.1
- 78 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
ANDERI (WEST), J.P. NAGAR
BOMBAY-400058.
435. PALLAVI
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
D/O SUHASINI S. ANCHAN
R/AT. 1-16, DIVISION NO.1
ANDERI (WEST), J.P. NAGAR
BOMBAY-400058.
436. SURAJ
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
D/O SUHASINI S. ANCHAN
R/AT 1-16, DIVISION NO.1 ANDERI (WEST)
J.P. NAGAR, BOMBAY-400058.
437. POOVAMMA
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
WIDOW, LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
438. PUSHPAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
D/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
439. UMESH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
- 79 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
440. MANOHARA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
441. CHANDRASHEKARA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
D/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
442. UMAVATHY
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
443. HARISH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
444. BHAVANISHANKARA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O LATE GOPAL
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
- 80 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
445. KOOSAMMA
AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS
WIDOW, LATE MADAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
446. JAGANATH
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
447. CHANDRAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
D/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
448. DEVAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
449. UPENDRA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
D/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
- 81 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
450. VIDYAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
451. VIJAYA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
452. BABITHAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
D/O LATE MADHAVA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-90, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
453. BHASHAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
D/O KOOSAMMA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-91, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
454. LOHITHAKSHI
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
D/O KOOSAMMA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-91, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
455. LAXMI
AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
- 82 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
WIDOW LATE SHIVAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
456. MOHAN
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
S/O LATE SHIVAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
457. SHALINI
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
D/O LATE SHIVAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
458. VANITHA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O LATE SHIVAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
459. SACHINDANAND
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE SHIVAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
460. MAMATHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
- 83 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O LATE SHIVAPPA
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
461. SABITHA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
D/O LAXMI
R/AT DOOR NO 2087, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
462. YAMUNA
AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS
WIDOW LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-87, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
463. RAVINDRA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-87, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
464. THILOTHAMA
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
S/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
465. RANJINI
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
- 84 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
466. HARINI
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
D/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
467. KESHAVA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
S/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
468. ROHITHAKSHA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
S/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
469. UDAYA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
S/O LATE SUNDARA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
470. JAYASHREE
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
- 85 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
S/O YAMUNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-81, MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
471. LAXMI
AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS
WIDOW LATE VENKANNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
472. BHARATHA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O LATE VENKANNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
473. BHANUMATHI
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O LATE VENKANNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
474. DEVADAS
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O LATE VENKANNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
475. SUREKHA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
- 86 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
D/O LATE VENKANNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
476. MALLIKA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
D/O LATE VENKANNA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(A), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
477. GOPALA
AGED ABOUT 104 YEARS
S/O LATE SANKAMMA
R/AT DOOR NO 2-88(1), MAROLI
DODDAMANE, MAROLI VILLAGE
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
478. RAMADAS
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
S/O PARVATHY
R/AT MAROLI
DODDAMANE, (ANCHANNA MANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE, POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 575005.
479. GIRIJA
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS
D/O JANAMMA
R/AT NAGAPPA COMPOUND, JEPPU
KANKANADY POST
MANGALORE-575002.
480. PARVATHI
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
D/O MANAPPA
- 87 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
R/AT. UMIKAN, SARIPALLA
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE-575005.
481. SHOBHA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
D/O PARVATHI
R/AT. UMIKAN, SARIPALLA
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE-575005.
482. SHASHIKALA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
D/O PARVATHI
R/AT. UMIKAN, SARIPALLA
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE-575005.
483. ARASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 107 YEARS
S/O SESU
R/AT DOOR NO.2-88(A)
MAROLI (ANCHANAMANE)
MAROLI VILLAGE
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE 57005.
484. ANANDA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O SHARADA
R/AT. NEAR B.M. TILE FACTORY
MAROLI KEMBR
MANGALORE-575005.
485. HARISCHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
S/O SHARADA ACHANNA
R/AT. DODDAMEN, MAROLI
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE-575005.
- 88 -
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
486. SHESHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 106 YEARS
S/O POOVAPPA
R/AT. ACHANNAMANE, MAROLI
POST KULASHEKAR
MANGALORE-575005.
...RESPONDENTS
---
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, PRAYING
TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S.NO.87/1991 ON THE FILE OF
THE II ADDL. C.J. (SR.DN.) & CJM MANGALORE D.K. SET
ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.07.2003 IN
O.S.NO.87/1991 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. C.J. (SR.DN.) &
CJM MANGALORE, D.K. & ETC.
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED ON
25.02.2026, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF
JUDGMENT, THIS DAY VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL J., DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
This appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and
decree dated 31.07.2003 passed in O.S.No.87/1991 by
the Court of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) and
CJM, Mangalore, D.K.District.
– 89 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
2. One Chennamma @ Parvathi and others have
filed a suit for partition of the suit schedule property by
metes and bounds and for delivery of their shares of the
suit schedule property. The said suit came to be decreed
with costs, plaintiff and defendant Nos.1 to 94 and
defendant Nos.135 to 144 were held entitled to the share
as mentioned in the judgment and the other defendants
were also held entitled to the share as mentioned. The
appellant claiming to be one of the legal heirs of
Smt.Kochu, has filed this appeal stating that she was not
arrayed as a party to the suit and she has a right and
interest over the suit schedule property. The appeal is
filed along with an application seeking condonation of
delay of 7039 days.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant reiterates
the grounds urged in the appeal and submits that the
appellant is the grand daughter of Smt.Kochu and without
making her as a party to the suit, the suit was decreed.
– 90 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
Hence, she is challenging the judgment and decree dated
31.07.2003 as she was not having knowledge about the
same. Hence, he seeks to condone the delay and consider
the appeal on merits.
4. We have heard the learned counsel for the
appellant and meticulously perused the affidavit
accompanying the application for condonation of delay and
the other material available on record.
5. The pleading in the appeal does not indicate as
to how the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and
decree under challenge. The appellant claims to be the
grand daughter of one Smt.Kochu. However, the
memorandum of appeal is silent with regard to Smt.Kochu
being a plaintiff or defendant in the suit. The statement of
facts or the grounds urged in the appeal do not indicate
the right of the appellant to file this appeal. Be that as it
may, the present appeal is filed with a delay of 7039 days
which is nearly 20 years from the date of judgment and
– 91 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
decree. The affidavit accompanying the application
seeking for condonation of delay indicates that the
appellant was not a party before the Trial Court in
O.S.No.87/1991, the appellant could not take steps to file
the above appeal due to the fact that she was minor and
not aware about the judgment and decree, had financial
difficulties, she could not approach the advocate to file an
appeal and only after mobilizing the funds, she preferred
an appeal and hence, the delay is unintentional and
beyond her control and she has a good case on merits.
The aforesaid cause shown in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the
affidavit cannot be termed as sufficient cause to condone
the delay of 7039 days in preferring the appeal.
6. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the following
cases has laid down the law with regard to consideration
of the application for condonation of delay. In the
judgment in BASAWARAJ AND ANOTHER Vs. SPECIAL
– 92 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER1, the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in paragraph Nos.11 to 15 has held as under:
“11. The expression “sufficient cause” should be
given a liberal interpretation to ensure that
substantial justice is done, but only so long as
negligence, inaction or lack of bona fides
cannot be imputed to the party concerned,
whether or not sufficient cause has been furnished,
can be decided on the facts of a particular case and
no straitjacket formula is possible. (Vide Madanlal v.
Shyamlal [(2002) 1 SCC 535 : AIR 2002 SC 100]
and Ram Nath Sao v. Gobardhan Sao [(2002) 3 SCC
195 : AIR 2002 SC 1201] .)
12. It is a settled legal proposition that law of
limitation may harshly affect a particular party
but it has to be applied with all its rigour when
the statute so prescribes. The court has no
power to extend the period of limitation on
equitable grounds. “A result flowing from a
statutory provision is never an evil. A court has no
power to ignore that provision to relieve what it
considers a distress resulting from its operation.” The
statutory provision may cause hardship or
inconvenience to a particular party but the court has1
(2013) 14 SCC 81
– 93 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
no choice but to enforce it giving full effect to the
same. The legal maxim dura lex sed lex which means
“the law is hard but it is the law”, stands attracted in
such a situation. It has consistently been held that,
“inconvenience is not” a decisive factor to be
considered while interpreting a statute.
13. The statute of limitation is founded on public
policy, its aim being to secure peace in the
community, to suppress fraud and perjury, to
quicken diligence and to prevent oppression. It seeks
to bury all acts of the past which have not been
agitated unexplainably and have from lapse of time
become stale. According to Halsbury’s Laws of
England, Vol. 28, p. 266:
“605. Policy of the Limitation Acts.–The courts
have expressed at least three differing reasons
supporting the existence of statutes of
limitations namely, (1) that long dormant
claims have more of cruelty than justice in
them, (2) that a defendant might have lost the
evidence to disprove a stale claim, and (3) that
persons with good causes of actions should
pursue them with reasonable diligence.”
An unlimited limitation would lead to a sense of
insecurity and uncertainty, and therefore,
limitation prevents disturbance or deprivation
of what may have been acquired in equity and
justice by long enjoyment or what may have
been lost by a party’s own inaction, negligence
or laches. (See Popat and Kotecha Property v.
SBI Staff Assn. [(2005) 7 SCC 510] , Rajender
Singh v. Santa Singh [(1973) 2 SCC 705 : AIR
1973 SC 2537] and Pundlik Jalam Patil v.
Jalgaon Medium Project [(2008) 17 SCC 448 :
(2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 907] .)
– 94 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
14. In P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka
[(2002) 4 SCC 578 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 830 : AIR 2002
SC 1856] this Court held that judicially engrafting
principles of limitation amounts to legislating and
would fly in the face of law laid down by the
Constitution Bench in Abdul Rehman Antulay v. R.S.
Nayak [(1992) 1 SCC 225 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 93 : AIR
1992 SC 1701] .
15. The law on the issue can be summarised to the
effect that where a case has been presented in the
court beyond limitation, the applicant has to explain
the court as to what was the “sufficient cause”
which means an adequate and enough reason
which prevented him to approach the court
within limitation. In case a party is found to be
negligent, or for want of bona fide on his part
in the facts and circumstances of the case, or
found to have not acted diligently or remained
inactive, there cannot be a justified ground to
condone the delay. No court could be justified in
condoning such an inordinate delay by imposing any
condition whatsoever. The application is to be
decided only within the parameters laid down by this
Court in regard to the condonation of delay. In case
there was no sufficient cause to prevent a litigant to
approach the court on time condoning the delay
– 95 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024HC-KAR
without any justification, putting any condition
whatsoever, amounts to passing an order in violation
of the statutory provisions and it tantamounts to
showing utter disregard to the legislature.”
(Emphasis supplied)
7. In the case of SHEO RAJ SINGH Vs. UNION
OF INDIA AND OTHERS2, the Hon’ble Supreme Court
has held in paragraph Nos.30 to 36 as under:
“30. Considering the aforementioned decisions,
there cannot be any quarrel that this Court has
stepped in to ensure that substantive rights of
private parties and the State are not defeated at the
threshold simply due to technical considerations of
delay. However, these decisions notwithstanding, we
reiterate that condonation of delay being a
discretionary power available to courts, exercise of
discretion must necessarily depend upon the
sufficiency of the cause shown and the degree of
acceptability of the explanation, the length of delay
being immaterial.
31. Sometimes, due to want of sufficient cause being
shown or an acceptable explanation being proffered,
delay of the shortest range may not be condoned
whereas, in certain other cases, delay of long periods
2
(2023) 10 SCC 531
– 96 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
can be condoned if the explanation is satisfactory
and acceptable. Of course, the courts must
distinguish between an “explanation” and an
“excuse”. An “explanation” is designed to give
someone all of the facts and lay out the cause for
something. It helps clarify the circumstances of a
particular event and allows the person to point out
that something that has happened is not his fault, if
it is really not his fault. Care must, however, be
taken to distinguish an “explanation” from an
“excuse”. Although people tend to see “explanation”
and “excuse” as the same thing and struggle to find
out the difference between the two, there is a
distinction which, though fine, is real.
32. An “excuse” is often offered by a person to deny
responsibility and consequences when under attack.
It is sort of a defensive action. Calling something as
just an “excuse” would imply that the explanation
proffered is believed not to be true. Thus said, there
is no formula that caters to all situations and,
therefore, each case for condonation of delay based
on existence or absence of sufficient cause has to be
decided on its own facts. At this stage, we cannot
but lament that it is only excuses, and not
explanations, that are more often accepted for
condonation of long delays to safeguard public
interest from those hidden forces whose sole agenda
– 97 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
is to ensure that a meritorious claim does not reach
the higher courts for adjudication.
33. Be that as it may, it is important to bear in mind
that we are not hearing an application for
condonation of delay but sitting in appeal over a
discretionary order of the High Court granting the
prayer for condonation of delay. In the case of the
former, whether to condone or not would be the only
question whereas in the latter, whether there has
been proper exercise of discretion in favour of grant
of the prayer for condonation would be the question.
Law is fairly well-settled that “a court of appeal
should not ordinarily interfere with the discretion
exercised by the courts below”. If any authority is
required, we can profitably refer to the decision in
Manjunath Anandappa v. Tammanasa [Manjunath
Anandappa v. Tammanasa, (2003) 10 SCC 390] ,
which in turn relied on the decision in Gujarat Steel
Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
[Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes
Mazdoor Sabha, (1980) 2 SCC 593 : 1980 SCC (L&S)
197] where it has been held that:
“an appellate power interferes not when the
order appealed is not right but only when it is
clearly wrong”.
34. The order under challenge in this appeal is dated
21-12-2011 [Union of India v. Sheo Raj, 2011 SCC
OnLine Del 5511] . It was rendered at a point of time
– 98 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
when the decisions in Katiji [Collector (LA) v. Katiji,
(1987) 2 SCC 107] , Ramegowda [G. Ramegowda v.
LAO, (1988) 2 SCC 142] , Chandra Mani [State of
Haryana v. Chandra Mani, (1996) 3 SCC 132] , K.V.
Ayisumma [Tehsildar (LA) v. K.V. Ayisumma, (1996)
10 SCC 634] and Lipok AO [State of Nagaland v.
Lipok Ao, (2005) 3 SCC 752 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 906]
were holding the field. It is not that the said
decisions do not hold the field now, having been
overruled by any subsequent decision. Although
there have been some decisions in the recent past
[State of M.P. v. Bherulal [State of M.P. v. Bherulal,
(2020) 10 SCC 654 : (2021) 1 SCC (Civ) 101 :
(2021) 1 SCC (Cri) 117 : (2021) 1 SCC (L&S) 84] is
one such decision apart from University of Delhi
[University of Delhi v. Union of India, (2020) 13 SCC
745] ] which have not accepted governmental
lethargy, tardiness and indolence in presenting
appeals within time as sufficient cause for
condonation of delay, yet, the exercise of discretion
by the High Court has to be tested on the anvil of the
liberal and justice oriented approach expounded in
the aforesaid decisions which have been referred to
above.
35. We find that the High Court in the present case
assigned the following reasons in support of its
order:
– 99 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024HC-KAR
35.1. The law of limitation was founded on public
policy, and that some lapse on the part of a litigant,
by itself, would not be sufficient to deny condonation
of delay as the same could cause miscarriage of
justice.
35.2. The expression “sufficient cause” is elastic
enough for courts to do substantial justice. Further,
when substantial justice and technical considerations
are pitted against one another, the former would
prevail.
35.3. It is upon the courts to consider the sufficiency
of cause shown for the delay, and the length of delay
is not always decisive while exercising discretion in
such matters if the delay is properly explained.
Further, the merits of a claim were also to be
considered when deciding such applications for
condonation of delay.
35.4. Further, a distinction should be drawn between
inordinate unexplained delay and explained delay,
where in the present case, the first respondent had
sufficiently explained the delay on account of
negligence on part of the government functionaries
and the government counsel on record before the
Reference Court.
– 100 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
35.5. The officer responsible for the negligence
would be liable to suffer and not public interest
through the State. The High Court felt inclined to
take a pragmatic view since the negligence therein
did not border on callousness.
36. Given these reasons, we do not consider
discretion to have been exercised by the High Court
in an arbitrary manner. The order under challenge
had to be a clearly wrong order so as to be liable for
interference, which it is not.”
(Emphasis supplied)
8. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, in the aforesaid
judgments has taken note of its earlier judgment in the
case of KATIJI referred to supra and held that the
approach of the Courts in condoning the delay should be
pragmatic when sufficient cause is shown. In the instant
case, the cause shown by the appellant is not sufficient to
condone the enormous delay of nearly 20 years.
9. It would also be useful to refer to the judgment
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PATHAPATI
SUBBA REDDY Vs. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR
– 101 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
(LA)3, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held in
paragraph Nos.15, 16, 17 and 26 as under:
“15. It is in the light of the public policy upon which
law of limitation is based, the object behind the law
of limitation and the mandatory and the directory
nature of Section 3 and Section 5 of the Limitation
Act that we have to examine and strike a balance
between Section 3 and Section 5 of the Limitation
Act in the matters of condoning the delay.
16. Generally, the courts have adopted a very
liberal approach in construing the phrase ‘sufficient
cause’ used in Section 5 of the Limitation Act in
order to condone the delay to enable the courts to
do substantial justice and to apply law in a
meaningful manner which subserves the ends of
justice. In Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v.
Katiji2, this Court in advocating the liberal approach
in condoning the delay for ‘sufficient cause’ held
that ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by
lodging an appeal late; it is not necessary to explain
every day’s delay in filing the appeal; and since
sometimes refusal to condone delay may result in
throwing out a meritorious matter, it is necessary in
the interest of justice that cause of substantial3
2024 SCCOnline SC 513
– 102 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024HC-KAR
justice should be allowed to prevail upon technical
considerations and if the delay is not deliberate, it
ought to be condoned. Notwithstanding the above,
howsoever, liberal approach is adopted in condoning
the delay, existence of ‘sufficient cause’ for not filing
the appeal in time, is a condition precedent for
exercising the discretionary power to condone the
delay. The phrases ‘liberal approach’, ‘justice-
oriented approach’ and cause for the advancement
of ‘substantial justice’ cannot be employed to defeat
the law of limitation so as to allow stale matters or
as a matter of fact dead matters to be revived and
re-opened by taking aid of Section 5 of the
Limitation Act.
17. It must always be borne in mind that while
construing ‘sufficient cause’ in deciding application
under Section 5 of the Act, that on the expiry of the
period of limitation prescribed for filing an appeal,
substantive right in favour of a decree-holder
accrues and this right ought not to be lightly
disturbed. The decree-holder treats the decree to be
binding with the lapse of time and may proceed on
such assumption creating new rights.
26. On a harmonious consideration of the provisions
of the law, as aforesaid, and the law laid down by
this Court, it is evident that:
– 103 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024HC-KAR
(i) Law of limitation is based upon
public policy that there should be an
end to litigation by forfeiting the
right to remedy rather than the right
itself;
(ii) A right or the remedy that has
not been exercised or availed of for a
long time must come to an end or
cease to exist after a fixed period of time;
(iii) The provisions of the Limitation Act
have to be construed differently, such as
Section 3 has to be construed in a strict
sense whereas Section 5 has to be
construed liberally;
(iv) In order to advance substantial
justice, though liberal approach,
justice-oriented approach or cause of
substantial justice may be kept in
mind but the same cannot be used to
defeat the substantial law of
limitation contained in Section 3 of
the Limitation Act;
(v) Courts are empowered to exercise
discretion to condone the delay if
sufficient cause had been explained, but
– 104 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
that exercise of power is
discretionary in nature and may not
be exercised even if sufficient cause
is established for various factors
such as, where there is inordinate
delay, negligence and want of due
diligence;
(vi) Merely some persons obtained
relief in similar matter, it does not
mean that others are also entitled to
the same benefit if the court is not
satisfied with the cause shown for
the delay in filing the appeal;
(vii) Merits of the case are not
required to be considered in
condoning the delay; and
(viii) Delay condonation application has
to be decided on the parameters laid
down for condoning the delay and
condoning the delay for the reason that
the conditions have been imposed,
tantamounts to disregarding the statutory
provision.”
(emphasis supplied)
– 105 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
10. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid
judgments has considered its earlier judgments in the case
of KATIJI and BASAWARAJ AND ANOTHER referred to
supra and held that the phrases ‘liberal approach’, ‘justice
oriented approach’ and ’cause for advancement of
substantial justice’ cannot be employed to defeat the law
of limitation so as to allow the stale matter to be revived
and reopened by taking shelter under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act. Further, it has been held that no Courts
would be justified in condoning such inordinate delay by
imposing any condition whatsoever.
11. Keeping in mind the enunciation of law laid
down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court referred to supra, we
are of the considered view that the appellant has failed to
show sufficient cause to condone the enormous delay of
7039 days. The averments made in the affidavit
accompanying the application for condonation of delay are
extremely vague and do not provide a satisfactory
explanation to condone such an enormous delay. The
– 106 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024
HC-KAR
condonation of enormous delay as sought by the appellant
is nothing but a revival of the dead right of the appellant.
Allowing the application would run contrary to the public
policy and cause great injustice to the respondents. The
Court is also required to keep in mind the finality of the lis
between the parties while condoning the delay. If Courts
start interpreting the word ‘sufficient cause’ in an unduly
liberal way even without there being any acceptable
explanation for condoning the enormous delay, it would
lead to unsettling the rights of the parties which were
settled by the Trial Court long ago. In the instant case,
the appellant has failed to show the sufficient cause to
condone the delay.
12. For the aforementioned reasons, we are of the
considered view that the appellant has failed to show the
sufficient cause to condone the delay of 7039 days in
preferring the appeal. Hence, we proceed to pass the
following:
– 107 –
NC: 2026:KHC:14002-DB
R.F.A. No.1968/2024HC-KAR
ORDER
I.A.No.1/2024 is dismissed. Consequently, the
appeal and other pending applications are dismissed.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN)
JUDGESd/-
(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
JUDGERV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
