Smt. P.N. Sudha vs Sri. Govindaraju on 16 March, 2026

    0
    38
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Karnataka High Court

    Smt. P.N. Sudha vs Sri. Govindaraju on 16 March, 2026

    Author: H.T. Narendra Prasad

    Bench: H.T. Narendra Prasad

                                                      -1-
                                                                   NC: 2026:KHC:15518
                                                                  WP No. 7697 of 2026
    
    
                          HC-KAR
    
    
    
    
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
    
                                   DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
    
                                                   BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 7697 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
                          BETWEEN:
    
                                SMT. P. N. SUDHA
                                WIFE OF D. N. PRASAD,
                                AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
                                RESIDING AT NO. 21,
                                6TH MAIN, KUVEMPUNAGAR,
                                DODDAKALLASANDRA,
                                BENGALURU - 560 062.
                                                                         ...PETITIONER
                          (BY SRI. ANIRUDH R. S., ADVOCATE FOR
                              SMT. SUSHMA NAGRAJ., ADVOCATE)
    
                          AND:
    
                          1.    SRI. GOVINDARAJU
                                S/O LATE LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA,
    Digitally signed by         AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
    DHANALAKSHMI
    MURTHY                      RESIDING AT NO. 45,
    Location: HIGH              CHINNAKURCHI VILLAGE,
    COURTOF                     K. GOLLAHALLI POST,
    KARNATAKA                   KENGERI HOBLI,
                                BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
                                BENGALURU - 560 060.
    
                          2.    SRI. MANOJ GOWDA M. L.
                                S/O VARALAKSHMI,
                                S/O LAXMI KUMAR,
                                AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
                                RESIDING AT MALATHALLI VILLAGE,
                                HAMLET OF BETHAMGERE,
                                GANAKAL POST, BIDADI HOBLI,
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2026:KHC:15518
                                           WP No. 7697 of 2026
    
    
    HC-KAR
    
    
    
    
        RAMANAGARA TALUK,
        BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-562 109.
                                             ...RESPONDENTS
    (BY SRI. B. N. SUNILKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
         THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
    AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
    ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER
    WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER, TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
    ORDER PRODUCED HEREWITH AT ANNEXURE-J FOR BASING
    RELIANCE ON UPLOADING ORDER ON ECOURTS/KIOSK AS
    EQUIVALENT TO SERVICE OR INTIMATION AS REQUIRED BY
    ORDER V OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
    
        THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
    ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
    CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
    
    
                           ORAL ORDER

    Learned counsel for the respondents has raised a

    preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this writ

    SPONSORED

    petition stating that against the order passed under Order

    39 Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner

    has a remedy of an appeal, hence, this writ petition is not

    maintainable.

    2. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed

    of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the

    appropriate legal forum.

    -3-

    NC: 2026:KHC:15518
    WP No. 7697 of 2026

    HC-KAR

    3. The interim order granted by this Court on

    06.03.2026 will be continued for a further period of two

    weeks.

    4. It is made clear that, if the petitioner approaches

    the I Appellate Court, the I Appellate Court is directed to

    consider the matter on merits.

    All the contentions of the parties are kept open.

    In view of disposal of the main matter, all pending

    applications stand disposed of.

    Sd/-

    (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD)
    JUDGE

    CM
    List No.: 1 Sl No.: 128

    [ad_1]

    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here