Telangana High Court
Smt.Koppaka Tulasi Usha Rani vs The State Of Telangana on 21 May, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.16786 of 2026
DATED: 21.05.2026
Between:
Smt. Koppaka Tulasi Usha Rani
W/o.Koppaka Srihari Babu ... Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration and
Urban Development Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ... Respondents
:: ORDER :
:
This writ petition is filed for the following relief:
“to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the
respondents 2 to 5 herein in demolishing/damaging the
construction material such as Iron Poles, ACC Shets and
other construction material, kept at the site bearing Plot
No.75-C, admeasuring 500 sq.yards, Jubilee Enclave
covered by Sy.No.66 and 67, Madhapur,
Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,
belonging to the petitioner, without following the
procedure contemplated in Greater Hyderabad
Municipal Corporation Act, as illegal, arbitrary and
consequently direct the respondents not to
demolish/damage the construction material lying on the
aforesaid premises i.e. Plot No.75-C, admeasuring 500
Sq.yards, Jubilee Enclave covered by Sy.No.66 and 67
Madhapur, SErilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy
District, belonging to the petitioner and pass…”
2. Heard Sri A.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for
respondent Nos.2 to 5.
2
3. The petitioner was granted building permission on 08.04.2026.
Thereafter, respondent No.5 has issued shortfall letter dated
28.04.2026 and the petitioner submitted explanation thereto and it is
yet to be considered. It is submitted that in the meantime
anticipating permission from the respondents, the petitioner has
purchased certain construction material such as Iron Poles, ACC
Sheets etc., and has placed the same in the said plot and
apprehending that the respondents are going to damage the said
property, he filed the present writ petition.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the
explanation, if any, submitted by the petitioner would be considered
by the respondents, in accordance with law.
5. The petitioner has granted provisional building permission on
08.04.2026 and until and unless the said permission is rejected or
cancelled, the respondent authorities cannot take any coercive steps.
6. In view of the above, the respondent authorities are directed not
to take any coercive steps against the construction material deposited
by the petitioner in the subject property till a decision is taken on the
material or documents, if any, submitted by the petitioner in reply to
the shortfall letter dated 28.04.2026.
7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There
shall be no order as to costs.
3
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition,
shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
Date: 21.05.2026
yvl/ns
[ad_1]
Source link
