Shubham Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. … on 10 July, 2026

    0
    5
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Jharkhand High Court

    Shubham Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. … on 10 July, 2026

    Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary

    Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary

                                        (2026:JHHC:20561)
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                 B. A. No. 6449 of 2026
    
       Shubham Yadav, aged about 26, son of Bajrangi Gope @ Rupesh Yadav,
       resident of village - Bada Bazar, Sardar Chowk, near Vishnu Mandir, PO
       - Sadar Hazaribag, PS - Sadar, District - Hazaribag. ... ...Petitioner
                                       Versus
       The State of Jharkhand.                        ... ... ...Opp. Party
                                       ------
    

    HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

    ——

    SPONSORED
     For the Petitioner        : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate
     For the State             : Mrs. Sushma Aind, Addl. P.P.
                                      ------
    
    Order No:- 02, Dated:- 10th July, 2026
          Heard the parties.
    

    The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in
    connection with Korrah P.S. Case No. 129 of 2021, registered for the
    offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 325, 341, 342 of
    the Indian Penal Code.

    The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation
    against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an
    unlawful assembly attempted to murder Utkarsh Kumar @ Goldi by
    assaulting him with rod. It is further submitted that the allegations
    against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal
    antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail
    application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody
    since 25.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 18 of the bail
    application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to
    cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will
    not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any
    manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the
    petitioner be admitted to bail.

    The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
    Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
    discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on
    bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on
    furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand)
    with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
    Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag, in connection with
    Korrah P.S. Case No. 129 of 2021, with the condition that the petitioner
    will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile
    number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the
    undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of
    the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the
    informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of
    the case.

    (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
    Dated – 10.07.2026
    Aditi



    Source link

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here